Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion.
Briefing Paper No. 1/2016 by Andrew Haylen
Page Content
The Commonwealth Government has run underlying structural deficits for 8 years
and the outlook remains rather pessimistic in terms of revenue growth. For the
State Governments, spending on health and education and other vital areas is
growing faster than GDP; while at the same time, revenues are threatened
because of reduced Commonwealth transfers.
The GST debate has consequently been brought forward, in part, to find
sustainable ways to address the current and potentially worsening structural
budget deficits. That being said, it is also part of a wider debate –
recently initiated by the Tax Discussion Paper – about ways to examine
the efficiency and sustainability of the tax base in Australia given a fixed
government revenue target. However, at this stage, a revenue target is yet to
be determined and remains a topic of conjecture, as emphasised recently by Paul
Keating.
The GST debate has divided political opinion. The NSW and South Australian
State Premiers Mike Baird and Jay Wetherill have been firmly in favour of a GST
increase; while the Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews put forward the proposal
of increasing the Medicare levy to cover additional health spending. The
Shorten Labor Opposition has come out in opposition to any changes to the GST,
suggesting that it would impact lower income households hardest.
On 8 February 2016, Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull identified “economic
growth and jobs” as key motivations behind any tax reform; suggesting
that he was yet to be convinced about suggested benefits from a direct GST and
income tax swap. From this, many concluded that the GST was “off the tax
reform table.”3 Other tax reform and revenue options remain to be decided
upon.
Bearing this in mind, this paper seeks to lay out the evidence for and against
increasing the rate and broadening the base of the GST in terms of the
GST’s relative efficiency, equity and revenue raising capacity. It also
lays out the potential spending options if additional revenues were raised from
a GST. As a prelude to that discussion this paper outlines the current
application of the GST in Australia, particularly in comparison to similarly
developed economies.
The final chapter of this paper will then compare the GST with other revenue
raising options to assess the possible viability of tax reform to address
projected structural budget deficits.