Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion.
Briefing Paper No. 08/2001 by Rachel Callinan
Page Content
On 29 March 2001, the Government introduced reforms to the New South Wales
workers’ compensation scheme, through the Workers Compensation
Legislation Amendment Bill 2001. The Bill was designed to amend the Workers
Compensation Act 1987 and its companion act, the Workplace Injury
Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, to make extensive reforms to
claims procedures, dispute resolution, commutation, lump sum compensation,
common law damages and other matters.
The Bill was strongly attacked by the union movement, the legal profession and
other stakeholders. The main concerns were: the proposed changes to the dispute
resolution procedures (particularly changes to the role of the Compensation
Court of New South Wales and the use of binding medical assessments); and
amendments to common law damages and statutory lump sum compensation.
After negotiations with stakeholders, the Government agreed, on 21 May, to make
alterations to the package of amendments and to refer the common law issues to
a judicial inquiry, to be undertaken by Justice Terry Sheahan. After a
breakdown in negotiations, the Government introduced a new amendment bill - the
Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill (No 2) - into the Legislative
Assembly on 19 June 2001. This paper examines the Government’s 2001
workers’ compensation reforms, particularly the contentious reforms.
PART A examines the common law and the statutory workers’
compensation scheme in New South Wales. In Section One, the development of the
common law remedy for workplace injuries caused by negligence is traced and the
current common law, as altered by statute, is set out. In Section Two, the
development of the statutory scheme is examined, followed by a review of the
scheme as it operates currently.
PART B examines the Government’s 2001 reforms. Section One looks
briefly at the perceived need for the reforms – WorkCover’s $2.18
billion deficit. Section Two provides an overview of the main aspects of Bill
No 2. In Section Three, an examination of the contentious reforms, including a
comparison between the original Bill and Bill No 2 is undertaken.
BACKGROUND
Over the years, New South Wales workers’ compensation legislation
has been amended on many occasions, in various attempts to fine-tune the
workers’ compensation scheme. It is currently facing a deficit of $2.8
billion. This year the Government intends to implement further reforms, some of
which have proved to be extremely controversial. The Workers Compensation
Legislation Amendment Bill 2001 was introduced into the Legislative Council on
29 March 2001. This Bill was designed to amend the Workers Compensation Act
1987 (‘the 1987 Act’) and its companion act, the
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998
(‘the 1998 Act’), to make extensive reforms to claims
procedures, dispute resolution, commutation, lump sum compensation, common law
damages and other matters.
The Bill met with intensive lobbying from trade unions, the legal profession
and other stakeholders. The main concerns were: proposed changes to the dispute
resolution procedures, particularly changes to the role of the Compensation
Court of New South Wales and the use of binding medical assessments; access to
common law; and the proposal to use American Medical Association guidelines to
assess permanent impairment of injured workers. Conversely, and not
surprisingly, most aspects of the original Bill were supported by employer
groups.1
After negotiations with stakeholders, the Government agreed, on 21 May 2001, to
make alterations to the package of amendments and to refer the common law
issues to a judicial inquiry, to be undertaken by Justice Terry Sheahan.2
The negotiations broke down and it became apparent that the Government
was intending to introduce a revised Bill into Parliament that the unions
claimed did not reflect the agreement they had with the Government. 19 June
2001 saw unprecedented union protests at the New South Wales Parliament that
were intended to prevent the legislation from being introduced into Parliament.
While the Legislative Assembly sat at the scheduled time of 2.15 pm the Speaker
left the chair. When the Assembly resumed three hours later, the Workers
Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill (No 2) (‘Bill No 2’) was
introduced and read the first and second time. It was passed the following
day.3
This paper examines the Governments’ 2001 workers’ compensation
reforms, particularly the contentious reforms. By way of background material,
Part A of the paper examines the common law and the statutory workers’
compensation scheme in New South Wales. In Section One, the development of the
common law remedy for workplace injuries caused by negligence is traced and the
current common law, as altered by statute, is set out. In Section Two, the
development of the statutory scheme is examined followed by a review of the
scheme as it operates currently.
Part B of the paper examines the Governments’ 2001 reforms. Section One
looks at the perceived need for the reforms – WorkCover’s $2.8
billion deficit. Section Two provides an overview of the main aspects of Bill
No 2. In Section Three, an examination of the contentious reforms, including a
comparison between the original Bill and Bill No 2 is undertaken.
A. WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN NEW SOUTH WALES
The New South Wales Parliamentary Library Research Service has published two
papers concerning workers’ compensation in New South Wales.4
These papers trace the development of the statutory scheme, from the
introduction of the first scheme in 1926, to legislative amendments to the
scheme in 1999. The papers also follow the development of the common law
remedies for workplace injury caused by negligence, and the statutory
modification of the common law in this area. The information contained in those
papers is summarised and updated in this Part.