In the lead up to the March 2011 State election, the NSW Liberals and
Nationals Fisheries Policy Statement, "Securing Sustainable, Viable and Healthy Fisheries", stated that their policy was "to ensure we
have a strong and viable commercial fishing industry". Following on from
this commitment, in March 2012 a review team, commissioned by the Minister for
Primary Industries, Katrina Hodgkinson, issued a major report: Independent
Review of NSW Commercial Fisheries Policy, Management and
Administration. This Briefing Paper seeks to set out the
background to the 2012 independent review and its key findings. The review
itself focuses on commercial, not recreational fishing. The same applies in
respect to the present paper.
Major commercial fishing activities: The commercial fishing
activities of NSW can be divided into the following fisheries, defined by a mix
of the type of fish caught and the capture methods employed. [2.1]
Types of fish caught and value: In 2009-10 a total of 13,422
tonnes of fish of "wild" (or non-aquaculture fish) were caught in
NSW, with a value of $80.5 million. [2.1]
Note on aquaculture: Aquaculture lies outside the scope of
this paper, the focus of which is on that part of the commercial fishing
industry considered in the 2012 Independent Review. It is enough to say that
oyster production is the oldest and most individually valuable NSW fishery. By
the early years of the twenty-first century, the value of production was $43
million. [2.1]
Imported seafood: As noted, in a Media
Release from 14 November 2012 the Minister for Primary
Industries said that 85% of seafood sold in NSW is imported. In 2008-09,
imports formed 71.6% of fish produce consumed in Australia. In 2009-10
Australia imported around $1.5 billion of fish products. [2.2]
1994 Fisheries Management Act: What was envisaged under
the Act was a consolidation of the industry. To achieve this, the 1994 Act
sought to establish "commercial share management fisheries", a
process that would involve deciding who should be eligible to take fish in that
fishery, and then issuing "shares" in the fishery to those who are
eligible. These "shares" could be "traded and borrowed
against". As the Minister explained: "This will allow fishermen to
enter and leave the industry freely and with dignity". [3]
Post-1994 reforms: The 1994 reform package was
introduced by degrees. [4]
Timeline
1996 |
Abalone and Lobster Fisheries Share Managed |
1997 |
OT/EG/OTL/OH/EPT Fisheries declared Restricted |
2000 |
OT/EG/OTL/OH/EPT Fisheries declared Category 2 Share Managed Fisheries |
2004 |
OT/EG/OTL/OH/EPT Fisheries declared Category 1 |
The reform strategy included buy-outs and cost recovery mechanisms.
Key features of the industry: : Since the 1980s the number of
commercial licences in the State has fallen by over 2,000, to a figure of 1,100
in 2011.
Many fishing businesses with shares in a fishery report a catch of less than
5% of the total catch in the fishery. In at least 4, out of the 5 fisheries,
over 60% of the fishers contribute less than 5% of the total catch. Share
management, at this stage, does not appear to have produced the consolidation
that was planned. [5]
Stevens report 2007: Commissioned by the Iemma government, in
October 2007 Richard Stevens (former Director of the federal government's
Fisheries Research and Development Corporation) published his Report on Structural Adjustment in Commercial
Fisheries in NSW. The report examined a range of options for
structural adjustment, including cancelling latent entitlements, issuing a
separate 'active' share and substantially increasing minimum shareholding
levels. However, the study concluded that the most feasible and cost effective
option for achieving the objectives of structural adjustment should incorporate
a three step approach, building on the adjustment model previously endorsed by
the Seafood Industry Advisory Council. [6]
2012 Independent Review Panel: Successive ALP State
governments sought to reform the commercial fishing industry in various ways,
including by enticing small-scale fishers out of the industry (through
buy-outs) or hastening their exit (through increased cost recovery charges).
However, by the time the O'Farrell government took office a substantial number
of small-scale operators remained; these were often only active when fish were
abundant and possessed the same number of shares as more viable fishers who
operated all year round. Conversely the access of more viable fishers to the
resource was diminished when small-scale fishers intermittently appeared on the
scene.
Providing viable fishers with security appeared to mean, in management
terms, that shares should equate to the degree of access to a fishery. As a
means to progress this, the O'Farrell government provided Richard Stevens a
second opportunity to examine NSW commercial fishing. [7.1]
Stevens and his colleagues divided their report around three main areas of
concern, presented in terms of problem and remedy: structural adjustment;
governance; and consultation. In November 2012 the O'Farrell government
released its response to the review's recommendations, substantially endorsing
the review team's advice. As noted, the Minister for Primary Industries
(Katrina Hodgkinson) declared in a media release that:
A lack of investment, ageing commercial fishing fleets, too many fishers
through poorly allocated fishing rights and excessive red tape have stifled the
industry. . .With 85 per cent of seafood sold in NSW being imported, these new
changes are needed to ensure that there is a continued availability of fresh,
local seafood. [7.2]
Stakeholder responses: There has been a mixed reaction to the
2012 independent review from the NSW commercial fishing industry.
[8.1]
On the other hand, responses from conservation groups have been supportive.
[8.2]