‘Domestic violence’ refers to one of a range of offences committed
against a person who is in a particular relationship to the perpetrator
(married, de facto or other intimate personal relationship, a relationship
involving dependency or a relative of the perpetrator). While the most obvious
manifestation of domestic violence is physical assault, verbal, emotional or
psychological abuse, financial and economic abuse and social abuse also
constitute domestic violence. The importance of defining domestic violence is
discussed in pages 2-5.
The level of non-reporting of incidents of domestic violence to police makes it
difficult to accurately quantify the incidence of domestic violence in the
community. One study has shown that only 15% of women who had experienced
sexual violence and 19% of women who had experienced physical violence reported
the incident to police in the previous 12 months. The main reasons for
non-reporting were that the woman dealt with the incident herself, that they
did not consider the incident a serious offence, or were embarrassed or
ashamed. A statistical picture of the incidence of domestic violence, compiled
from a number of sources is painted in pages 6 to 9. Characteristics of those
who apply for apprehended violence orders, and the nature and timing of their
breach are illustrated on pages 10 to 13.
Apprehended violence orders (AVOs) are the primary legal means by which victims
of domestic violence are offered protection in NSW. AVOs were first inserted
into the
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) in 1982 and since that time their use has
increased dramatically. For example 1,462 AVOs were issued in 1987, compared
with 25,556 in 1998. Since its commencement the law relating to AVOs has been
amended numerous times, most often to expand its scope and application. Most
recently, a major overhaul of the AVO system was implemented by the
Crimes
Amendment (Apprehended Violence) Act 1999 in which, among other things,
domestic and personal AVOs were distinguished and, for the first time, an
objects statement in relation to domestic AVOs was inserted into the
Crimes
Act. A history of AVO legislation can be found in pages 15 to 19. The
operation of the AVO scheme in NSW is examined in pages 19 to 21. Other forms
of regulation discussed in the paper include injunctions under the
Family
Law Act 1975 (Cth) and the
Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW)
(pages 25 to 27) and the
Bail Act 1978 (NSW) (pages 27 to 29).
Claims that AVOs are being abused are widespread. These claims usually fall
into two categories – that domestic AVOs are being used by women in
family court proceedings to gain some tactical advantage against an ex-partner
in an attempt to prevent him from having contact with their children, and that
trivial or ‘waste of time’ personal AVOs are being sought in
disputes between neighbours. These issues are discussed in pages 23 to 25.
While domestic violence is a concern for the whole community, it is the police
who in the majority of cases intervene at an early stage. Therefore the
response of the police to an initial call for assistance in a domestic violence
matter is crucial for the immediate protection of the victim and the overall
outcome of the matter. Police powers in relation to domestic violence and the
level of satisfaction with police response to the issues of domestic violence
are canvassed in pages 30 to 33.