Page Content
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The focus of this paper is specifically defined to relate to child pornography
law. The relevant statutory provisions are set out, with reference to NSW and
other Australian jurisdictions, and their operation and application analysed by
reference to the available statistical data and case law.
The Henson affair: Issues concerning child pornography have been
prominent in political and media debates in recent times. One focus of
controversy in recent months has been the exhibition of photographs by Bill
Henson at one of Sydney’s leading art galleries. The upshot to the Henson
controversy was that the exhibition opened, with entry by invitation only. No
sooner was the matter resolved than further controversy arose over the
publication in Arts Monthly Australia of pictures of a naked six-year
old girl, in an edition of the magazine that explored the Henson controversy.
It is reported that the Rudd Government will ask the Australia Council to
develop, in consultation with the arts sector and the general community, a set
of protocols to cover the representation of children in art. Going a step
further, the NSW Community Services Minister Kevin Greene has urged the
development of new classification standards in respect to children in art for
the purpose of achieving ‘greater clarity and consistency’. The NSW
Attorney General John Hatzistergos had also written to State and federal
Ministers calling for ‘the classification system to be
strengthened’. In response, the executive director of the National
Association for the Visual Arts, Tamara Winikoff, expressed concern, saying
‘The reaction has been excessive and ill-considered because there’s
already a huge amount of protection in place’. [2.1]
High profile cases: Media attention has been drawn to high profile cases
involving child pornography, including that of the former NSW deputy Crown
prosecutor Patrick Power and former NSW Aboriginal Affairs Minister, Milton
Orkopoulos. [2.2]
The Internet and police operations: Referring to the availability of
child pornography material on the Internet, AFP Commissioner, Mike Keelty, said
in 2004 that ‘Canadian estimates place the number of child pornographic
websites operating globally at over 100,000, generating around US$3 billion per
annum’. Responding to this challenge, specialist police units have been
formed in Australian States and federally to combat online child exploitation.
Internationally, in December 2003, the Virtual Global Taskforce was
established. Operation Auxin was an Australian police operation conducted in
September 2004. It followed the receipt in the previous March of a referral
from Operation Falcon, an FBI investigation into online child pornography.
Arrests occurred by jurisdiction as follows: Victoria 68; Queensland 57; NSW
28; Western Australia 24; Northern Territory seven; South Australia six; and
Tasmania one. In the wake of Operation Auxin, the law on child pornography was
amended across Australia, with the introduction of harsher penalties (among
other things). As a result of Operation Centurion in June 2008 the following
jurisdictional breakdown for arrests was reported: Queensland 40; NSW 23;
Victoria 17; South Australia four; ACT three; and one each in Tasmania and
Western Australia. [2.3]
Not a victimless crime: The accessibility of child pornography or child
abuse images on the Internet raises the question of the relationship between
the viewing of such images and actual child abuse off-line by the offender
concerned. It is agreed that the very act of accessing child pornography makes
the offender a party to child sexual abuse. As the UK Sentencing Panel
observed: ‘Possession of child pornography is not (as some have argued) a
victimless offence’. [2.5]
Definitional issues: Definitions of child pornography can vary
considerably, both in a legal context from one jurisdiction to another, and
between legal and non-legal approaches to the subject. One source of ambiguity
is that the legal definition of a ‘child’ varies between and within
jurisdictions for various purposes. In Australia, child pornography legislation
in some jurisdictions defines ‘child’ as a person under, or who
appears to be under 16 (NSW, Queensland, South Australia, and Western
Australia), in others as a person under, or who appears to be under 18 years of
age (Commonwealth, Tasmania, Victoria, the ACT and the Northern Territory).
[3.1.2]
A further complicating factor for any definition of child pornography is the
varieties of behaviour depicted. The narrowest definition would cover only
depictions of actual children engaged in explicit sexual activity. In
Australia, the various legal definitions of child pornography seek to
accommodate the broader view of child pornography. For NSW, the relevant
definition includes reference to depictions or descriptions of a child
‘engaged in sexual activity’ or ‘in a sexual context’.
The NSW definition of child pornography also makes reference to a third
category of prohibited material, relating to depictions or descriptions of a
child ‘as the victim of torture, cruelty or physical abuse (whether or
not in a sexual context)’. [3.1.8]
Typologies: In recognition of the wide range of images that might be
classified as child pornography, COPINE (Combating Paedophile Information
Networks in Europe) has developed a grading scheme for categories of child
pornography material. [4.2] The COPINE 10 level typology has become
influential in clinical and in legal circles. A revised typology was formulated
by the UK Sentencing Panel in 2002. [4.3] Subsequently, in the guideline
judgment of Oliver [2002] EWCA Crim 2766, the UK Court of Appeal
(Criminal Division) accepted, subject to one revision, the Panel's analysis of
increasing seriousness by reference to five different levels of activity: (1)
images depicting erotic posing with no sexual activity; (2) sexual activity
between children, or solo masturbation by a child; (3) non-penetrative sexual
activity between adults and children; (4) penetrative sexual activity between
children and adults; and (5) sadism or bestiality. [4.4] Judicial
reference has been made in NSW to the COPINE typology, as in R v Saddler
[2008] NSWDC 48. However, in the same case Berman SC DCJ rejected any
suggestion that the NSW courts should go one step further and take note of the
sentencing guidelines laid down by the UK Court of Appeal in Oliver,
saying that ‘sentencing is essentially a local matter’.
[4.5]
Legislative framework: There are a number of arms to the regulation of
child pornography, which traverses censorship, customs, crimes and broadcasting
legislation, some of which is at State or Territory level and some at the
federal level. Of these, it is the various crimes statutes and the Commonwealth
customs legislation that are the most important legislative instruments in the
fight against child pornography. Censorship and broadcasting legislation are
also relevant. [5.1 and 5.2] As set out in Table 1, federally
prosecutions are undertaken pursuant to s 233BAB of the Customs Act 1901
(Cth), which contains offences for the importation and exportation of, amongst
other things, child pornography and child abuse material in hard copy.
[5.4] Also at the Commonwealth level, the prosecution of online offences
is undertaken under the Criminal Code Act 1995. [5.5] Relevant
State and Territory offences, which are not confined to online offences, are
set out in Table 2. [5.6] Set out in Table 3 are the State and Territory
offences relating to the use of children for pornographic purposes.
[5.8]
Sentencing issues and child pornography case law: Sentencing issues are
raised in relation to child pornography offences, notably the adequacy of
penalties imposed on offenders. Maximum penalties are amongst the issues to be
considered in the NSW Sentencing Council’s current review of sexual
offences. The statistics indicate that those who commit child pornography
offences are overwhelmingly male and the majority of offenders plead guilty. A
significant number of child pornography offenders are sentenced in a Local
Court, in which case the maximum penalty is lower than if a matter is heard in
a District Court. Statistics indicate that the average length of
imprisonment for NSW child pornography offences is 12 months. The average
length of the sentences for Commonwealth child pornography offences in
2007-2008 is higher than the previous year, which may indicate a trend towards
harsher sentences for child pornography offences. [6.7]
Case law: The case law has also raised a number of issues about how
child pornography offenders are charged and sentenced when a large number of
items are found in their possession. In R v Saddler [2008] NSWDC 48,
after discussing the nature of child pornography offences, Judge Berman
commented on the inadequacy of the maximum penalty for the offence of
possession of child pornography under section 91H(3) Crimes Act 1900
(NSW). Saddler was charged with three counts of possessing child pornography,
each relating to a different location where the items of child pornography were
found. Judge Berman commented that the three charges covered ‘an enormous
number of separate items of child pornography’. [7.1]
Advances in technology such as the development of mobile phone cameras have
also meant that problems such as ‘up-skirting’, where the offender
takes a picture up the skirt of a female child, have been addressed by the
courts. In Drummond [2008] NSWLC 10 the surreptitious,
‘up-skirt’ filming of a 14 year old schoolgirl was found ‘in
all the circumstances’ to constitute child pornography. One question is
whether such behaviour should be prosecuted under a new and separate offence,
similar to the offence of intimate covert filming, which was introduced into
the New Zealand Crimes Act (s 216G) in 2006. [4.4 and 7.6]