Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion.
Briefing Paper No. 09/2005 by Talina Drabsch
Page Content
The practice of inducing an abortion has existed for many years and remains
controversial to this day. The debate on the availability and regulation of
abortion services can at times be extremely divisive, yet surveys have found
that the majority of Australians are fairly moderate in their view of how
accessible the procedure should be. Whilst this paper highlights some aspects
of the current debate, it is primarily concerned with the way abortion is
regulated in New South Wales, throughout the rest of Australia, and in some
overseas jurisdictions.
Section one (pp 1-12) of this paper defines some of the key terms used in the
context of abortion. It also provides a statistical overview of the number of
abortions in Australia and the characteristics of those who undergo the
procedure. Nevertheless, the limitations of abortion statistics are noted. This
section also outlines the position of those who are ‘pro-life’ and
‘pro-choice’ and examines the results of a survey of the attitudes
of Australians toward abortion. It discusses the competing rights and interests
that may be involved, namely those of the pregnant woman, foetus, biological
father and medical staff.
In section two (pp 13-18), a history of the development of the law on abortion
is included. It describes the various statutory provisions that have operated
in the United Kingdom, and their impact on the development of abortion law in
Australia.
Much of the law on abortion continues to be located in the various Crimes Acts
and Criminal Codes that apply in Australia. Section three (pp 19-25) examines
the law in New South Wales, noting the relevant provisions of the Crimes Act
1900 (NSW) and the judicial interpretation of these sections in the case
of R v Wald. The civil matter of CES v Superclinics (Australia) Pty
Limited is also considered. This section notes some of the parliamentary
attempts throughout the years to increase the restrictions on the provision of
abortion services in New South Wales.
Section four (pp 26-34) compares the regulation of abortion in the various
Australian jurisdictions. In Tasmania and Western Australia, the threatened
prosecution of medical practitioners who performed abortions after decades of
non-prosecution sparked recent reform of the law. The Australian Capital
Territory is the only jurisdiction to have completely decriminalised abortion.
The regulation of abortion in Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the
United States of America is discussed in section five (pp 35-49). This is
preceded by a brief overview of the different stances toward abortion
worldwide.
Finally, various aspects of the current debate on abortion are discussed in
section six (pp 50-59). Some of the weaknesses of the current law are noted,
and opinions on whether abortion is best characterised as a health or criminal
issue are analysed. This section examines some of the benefits and concerns
associated with the use of emergency contraception and the abortion pill, and
discusses the implications of late-term abortions. The use of
‘bubble-zone’ legislation to protect providers of abortion services
is also considered.