Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
On Thursday 3rd April 2025, 6:00pm to 7:00pm (AEST), this website will be undergoing maintenance and you may experience delays during that time.

Question and Answer Tracking Details

666 - ORICA TOXIC LEAK

Hornery, Sonia to the Minister for the Environment, and Minister for Heritage
  1. Why were the people in the "outer zone" of the residential area of Stockton not informed earlier that they could be affected by the Orica toxic leak?
  2. If there is nothing to worry about in terms of outfall, why have residents' houses been hosed down?
Answer -

I am advised as follows:

  1. The "outer zone" was identified by the Office of Environment and Heritage as a precautionary measure, to ensure that Orica could not avoid its responsibilities to clean up the contaminants it released.
    Modelling undertaken by the Office of Environment and Heritage, together with ground inspections, identified the area anticipated to be most affected by Orica's discharge. This area was described as the "inner zone" and the purpose of delineating it was to require Orica to focus its clean up efforts on that zone and start work immediately. The outer zone was included in the Clean Up Notice so that if additional properties were detected with deposits of the contaminant, Orica would be obliged to clean these as well.
  2. Orica had a duty to ensure the properties were cleaned, even if the deposited material presented no risk to human health.

Question asked on 23 August 2011 (session 55-1) and printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 34
Answer received on 13 September 2011 and printed in Questions & Answers Paper No. 43