Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion.
Briefing Paper No. 14/2000 by John Wilkinson
Page Content
* consumption tax, in Australia, has some of its origins in the introduction
and expansion of sales tax which has been described as a regressive tax
(pp.5-8)
* the business community has been one sector that has directly championed the
introduction of a goods and services tax (p.9)
* the federal parliament has the fundamental legislative control over the
recently introduced goods and services tax (pp.12-13)
* federal-state financial relations have been altered, to some degree, by the
abolition of financial assistance grants and revenue replacement grants –
and by the distribution of goods and services tax (GST) revenue amongst the
states and territories (pp.10-11)
* business activity in the individual states may, in fact, be assisted by the
accompanying abolition of a range of state taxes (pp.10-12)
* goods and services tax revenue should grow significantly in the years to
come, and should eventually benefit NSW (pp.15-17)
* the role of the Commonwealth Grants Commission in apportioning the shares of
GST revenue – amongst the various states and territories – may
over-advantage some jurisdictions and discriminate against others (pp.17-20)
* NSW’s concentration of wealth should insulate the state from any
initial disadvantages in shares of GST revenue (pp.14-15)