Member repeatedly called to order (1990 precedent for S.O.288 of 1994)

1. The Speaker ordered the removal of the Leader of the Opposition from the House after he failed to withdraw and apologise for referring to the Deputy Premier as a 'crook' as directed.
PD 15/11/1990, pp 9794 - 9795
Related Orders, Precedents and Rulings
Standing Order 288 of 1994 (Repealed)288. If a Member's conduct is such that it is necessary for the Speaker or Chairman of Committees to call the Member to order more than three times in any one sitting for any gross breach of the rules, the Speaker or Chairman may direct the removal of the Member from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms until the adjournment of that sitting.
2006 Precedent1. During questions without notice the Speaker ordered the Deputy Serjeant at Arms to remove a member who had been repeatedly called to order. PD 05/09/2006, p 1394; PD 06/09/2006, p 1549; PD 26/09/2006, p 2241; PD 19/10/2006, p 3084
2005 Precedent1. During questions without notice, the Speaker ordered the Deputy Serjeant at Arms to remove the member for Vaucluse after he had previously been placed on three calls to order. PD 07/06/2005, p 16441 VP 07/06/2005, p 1435 2. During the debate on a matter of public importance the Acting-Speaker ordered the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove the member for Coffs Harbour. PD 18/10/2005, p 18781
2004 Precedent1. During questions without notice, the Speaker directed the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove a member (Murrumbidgee) who was on three calls to order after he interjected during a Minister's response to a question. PD 17/02/2004, p 6169 VP 17/02/2004, p 577 2. During questions without notice, the Speaker directed the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove a member (Epping) who interjected by way of a point of order during the Premier's response to a question noting that the member had treated the House in a grossly disorderly way. PD 26/02/2004, p 6719 VP 26/02/2004, p 626 3. During the giving of a mini-budget speech by the Treasurer, the Speaker noted that he had given a member specific warnings about interjecting and that the member had defied those warnings so ordered the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove the member (Wakehurst) from the Chamber. Following the removal of the member a point of order was raised that the standing orders require the Serjeant-at-Arms to remove members and that the Serjeant was not present in the Chamber. The Speaker advsied the member to study the standing orders more thoroughly before wasting the time of the House with spurious points of order. PD 06/04/2004, pp 8089 - 8090 4. During questions without notice, the Speaker asked the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove a member (North Shore) noting that he had given her several warnings and had indicated to her that she was on three calls to order. PD 06/04/2004, p 8113 5. During questions without notice, the Speaker directed the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove a member (Coffs Harbour) who had interrupted the Premier's answer under the guise of a point of order. When the member refused to leave the Chamber he was subsequently named. PD 12/05/2004, p 8885 6. During questions without notice, the Speaker placed the Leader of the Opposition on three calls to order for interrupting the Premier's response to a question. When the Leader of the Opposition continued to interrupt the Speaker directed the Deputy Serjeant-at-Arms to remove him from
2003 Precedent1. The Acting Speaker ordered the Deputy Serjeant at Arms to remove the Member for Myall Lakes from the Chamber for the remainder of Question Time having called him to order three times. Another member rose on a point of order arguing that the Chair had double standards and should also remove the Deputy Premier who was flouting repeated rulings about the use of props in the Chamber. The Acting Speaker ordered that member to resume his seat and not to challenge the ruling of the Chair. PD 02/07/2003, 2643 2. Following repeated warnings about wasting the time of the House by raising points of order that have no substance, the Acting Speaker ordered the Deputy Serjeant at Arms to remove the member for Wakehurst. PD 03/07/2003, 2845 3. A member raised a matter of privilege regarding the removal of a member from the Chamber by the Deputy Serjeant at Arms arguing that standing order 288 requires the ejection to be carried out by the Serjeant at Arms, who was not in the Chamber at the time. The member claimed that he was seeking advice for the House, following changes to the position and responsibilities of the Deputy Serjeant at Arms and on the legality of the Deputy, rather than the Serjeant at Arms escorting members from the House. The Acting Speaker reminded members that the Serjeant-at-Arms is also the Clerk-Assistant (Procedure) who has duties at the Table. The Acting Speaker also informed the House that the Deputy Serjeant at Arms acts under the delegation of the Serjeant at Arms and that accordingly he had requested the Deputy to escort the member from the House. PD 03/07/2003, 2848 4. During questions without notice the Speaker made a number of comments about the performance of the Leader of the Opposition in the House in relation to making interjections. The Deputy Leader of the Opposition raised a point of order arguing that the Speaker is responsible for upholding the standing orders of the House and should not denigrate the Leader of the Opposition. The Speaker placed the Deputy Leader of the Opposition on
2002 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 19/9/02, 454 VP 24/9/02, 462 VP 24/9/02, 462 VP 14/11/02, 599 VP 14/11/02, 600 VP 19/11/02, 620 VP 20/11/02, 637
2001 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 28/2/01, 1062 VP 11/4/01, 1189 VP 29/5/01, 1215 VP 20/6/01, 1293 VP 26/6/01, 1339 VP 18/10/01, 1531 VP 24/10/01, 1554 VP 7/11/01, 1593 VP 8/11/01, 1603 PD 14/11/01, 18615 VP 27/11/01, 1655 VP 28/11/01, 1670 VP 28/11/01, 1670 VP 5/12/01, 1723 2. The Speaker ordered Members to remain silent and seated while the Chair was speaking and asked the Serjeant-at-Arms to request a Member to see him in his suite. VP 29/5/01, 1215 3. Following the removal of an Opposition Member from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms, another Member of the Opposition took a point of order that he was not aware that the Member had been called to order once, let alone three times. The Speaker advised he had placed every Member on three calls to order. PD 28/11/01, 19063.
2000 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 05/04/00, 357 VP 06/04/00, 373 VP 12/04/00, 391 VP 12/04/00, 407 VP 12/04/00, 407 VP 29/06/00, 669 VP 09/08/2000, 701 VP 12/10/2000, 799 VP 23/11/2000, 934 VP 30/11/2000, 985
1999 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 23/06/99, 161 VP 22/09/99, 107 VP 23/09/99, 118 VP 20/10/99, 142 VP 26/10/99, 160 VP 10/11/99, 218 VP 18/11/99, 265 VP 18/11/99, 274 (two members)
1998 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 31/03/98, 437 VP 02/04/98, 465 VP 28/04/98, 498 VP 29/04/98, 513 VP 07/05/98, 576 VP 19/05/98, 585 VP 21/05/98, 610 VP 28/05/98, 661 (two members) VP 16/06/98, 724 VP 23/06/98, 757 VP 08/09/98, 825 VP 23/09/98, 882 VP 13/10/98, 917 VP 14/10/98 933
1997 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 09/04/97, 754 (two members) VP 10/04/97, 766 VP 15/04/97, 772 VP 22/04/97, 806 VP 06/05/97, 288 VP 06/05/97, 831 VP 07/05/97, 842 VP 13/05/97, 865 VP 14/05/97, 879 VP 21/05/97, 917 (two members) VP 28/05/97, 962 VP 19/06/97, 1042 (three members) VP 17/09/97, 45 VP 23/9/97 VP 15/10/97, 132 VP 23/10/97, 200 VP 12/11/97, 231 VP 20/11/97, 293 VP 26/11/97, 320
1996 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 30/5/96, 212 (three members) VP 17/9/96, 381 2. Leave refused for member to move a motion to suspend standing orders to allow a suspended member to return to the House. PD 30/5/96, 1848
1995 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a Member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms VP 23/5/95, 38 PD 12/10/95, 1716 VP 26/10/95, 356 VP 6/12/95, 483
1993 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. Several points of order , both and against the suspension, were raised. The Speaker ruled that he had no desire to remove from the services of the House the person who was leader of Opposition business in the House. Nevetheless, the person who holds that office was not immune from action being taken against him for failing to uphold the dignity and discipline of the House. He proposed to adhere to his original direction. He was willing, as was the custom and practice, to receive before the end of questions an apology conveyed by another member of the member's party and he would then consider re-admitting the member. An apology on behalf of the member was subsequently conveyed to the Speaker in the Chair and the member was re-admitted. PD 19/11/93, 5859, 5863 VP 19/11/93, 594, 595-6
1992 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 20/3/92, 153
1991 Precedent1. By direction of the Speaker, a member was removed from the Chamber by the Serjeant-at-Arms. VP 23/10/91, 277
1990 Precedent1. The Speaker ordered the removal of the Leader of the Opposition from the House after he failed to withdraw and apologise for referring to the Deputy Premier as a 'crook' as directed. PD 15/11/1990, pp 9794 - 9795


« Return to Precedents index