523
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Wednesday 5 April 2000


399







PARLIAMENT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

1999-2000

SECOND SESSION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND PARLIAMENT

___________


QUESTIONS
AND
ANSWERS

no. 25

Wednesday 4 April 2000


___________




(The Questions and Answers Paper published for the first sitting day in each week will contain, by number and title, all unanswered questions, together with questions to which answers have been received on the previous sitting and any new questions. On subsequent days, new questions are printed, as are questions to which answers were received the previous day. Consequently the full text of any question will be printed only twice: when notice is given; and, when answered.)

PUBLICATION OF QUESTIONS	ANSWER TO BE LODGED BY
Q. & A. No. 19 (Including Question Nos 189 to 219)	14 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 20 (Including Question Nos 220 to 242)	15 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 21 (Including Question Nos 243 to 267)	16 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 22 (Including Question Nos 268 to 326)	21 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 23 (Including Question Nos 327 to 356)	22 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 24 (Including Question Nos 357 to 372)	23 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 24 (continued) (Including Question Nos 373 to 409)	30 December 1999
Q. & A. No. 25 (Including Question Nos 410 to 433)	9 May 2000

Notice of Question given on the date shown

9 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 19)

189 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT—WENTWORTHVILLE—Ms Allan to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) How many accidents have occurred at the intersection of O’Briens Road and James Ruse Drive at Wentworthville in 1998 and 1999?
(2) What plans, if any, has the RTA to improve traffic management at this location?

Answer—

(1) During 1998, there were four accidents resulting in one person being injured. There were no fatalities.
With regard to this year, provisional data available as at 9 November 1999 indicates that there have been four accidents with no fatalities or injuries.
(2) The Roads and Traffic Authority is currently investigating options to improve traffic flow on Windsor Road between Hammers Road and the site in question. Discussions with Parramatta City Council will be initiated following identification of available options.

190 SERVICEABLE TRAFFIC SIGNALS—WENTWORTHVILLE—Ms Allan to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

Will he instruct the RTA to ensure that the right-hand turn arrow from Darcy Road into the Cumberland Highway at Wentworthville becomes operational?

Answer—

At this stage, there are no proposals to introduce a right turn phase at the western approach of Darcy Road for eastbound traffic turning onto the Cumberland Highway.
The demand for this right turn manoeuvre is low in comparison to the other three right turns at this intersection. Furthermore, the installation of a right turn phase would have a major impact on traffic flow through the intersection and create traffic delays on the Cumberland Highway.
Nevertheless, the Roads and Traffic Authority will continue to closely monitor the intersection.

191 PROSPECT RESERVOIR—Ms Allan to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—

What are Sydney Water’s intentions for recreational use of Prospect Reservoir?

Answer—

On 2 July 1999, the ownership of Prospect Reservoir was transferred to the newly formed Sydney Catchment Authority. I am advised by the Minister for the Environment that recreational use of Prospect Reservoir in the longer term is currently under review by the Sydney Catchment Authority. The outcomes of the review will form the basis of the Sydney Catchment Authority’s policy on the matter.

192 STAFFING—MURRUMBIDGEE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) What strategy has he put in place to rectify staff shortages at the Murrumbidgee College of Agriculture?
(2) Can he indicate when the following full-time positions will be filled:
(a) Deputy Principal (vacant since August 1997)?
(b) Two essential lecturers (vacant since February and March 1999)?
(c) Manager of Continuing Education?

Answer—

(1) During 1999, NSW Agriculture Livestock Officers (Sheep and Wool) and Irrigation Officers have been lecturing at Murrumbidgee College of Agriculture to cover all of the relevant course requirements. I am confident that with these arrangements, students have had the best possible opportunity to meet the requirements for their certificates.
(2) (a) The position of Deputy Principal has been advertised and applications closed on 3 December 1999. It is anticipated that the position will be filled within the next month.
(b) The position of Lecturer in Sheep and Rangelands will be advertised in early January 1999. The lecturing requirements for irrigation will continue to be met during 2000 by Irrigation Officers located in the Riverina.
(c) The position of Manager, Continuing Education, will be filled during January 2000.

193 NOISE REDUCTION MEASURES—EAST HILLS RAILWAY LINE—Mr Ashton to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Can he advise of any plans to place sound barriers (buffers) or noise reduction measures in place along the East Hills railway line in the East Hills electorate?
(2) Will the department be planting Australian native plants as part of any sound reduction measures?

Answer—

I am advised by the Rail Access Corporation of the following:
(1) and (2) The East Hills line amplification works includes 6 kilometres of noise walls between Turrella and Beverly Hills at a cost of $6.5 million.
The noise wall design and colour has been developed with community and local council input. The final design will incorporate transparent panels specially designed so that residents along the rail corridor will not be affected by overshadowing.
A landscape strategy will determine what plants are used and will more than likely include Australian native plants.

194 LANDCOM—Mr Brogden to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

(1) How much did Landcom pay to the NSW Government in dividends for the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(2) How much is Landcom expected to pay the NSW Government in dividends for the financial years:
(a) 1999-2000?
(b) 2000-01?
(c) 2001-02?
(3) How much did Landcom pay to the NSW Government in tax equivalent payments for the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(4) How much is Landcom expected to pay the NSW Government in tax equivalents for the financial years:
(a) 1999-2000?
(b) 2000-01?
(c) 2001-02?
(5) What was the total value of the land released by Landcom in the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(6) What has been the average value (real and nominal) per hectare of land released by Landcom in the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(7) How many hectares of land were sold by Landcom via direct sale in the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(8) How many hectares of land were sold by Landcom via auction in the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(9) How much land, in hectares, did Landcom release for development in conjunction with a private developer in the financial years:
(a) 1994-95?
(b) 1995-96?
(c) 1996-97?
(d) 1997-98?
(e) 1998-99?
(10) How much land, in hectares, is Landcom expected to release for development in conjunction with a private developer in the financial years:
(a) 1999-2000?
(b) 2000-01?
(c) 2001-02?

Answer—

(1) This information can be obtained from the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning’s Annual Report for the relevant year.
(2) Dividends are calculated as 34 per cent of pre-tax profits.
(3) This information can be obtained from the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning’s Annual Report for the relevant year.
(4) Taxation equivalent payments are calculated as 36 per cent of profits.
(5) Landcom does not maintain records of the value of home sites released but does maintain details of the value of home sites sold. This information can be obtained from the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning’s Annual Report for the relevant year.
(6) Land released for retail sale is not recorded on a hectare basis.
(7) Landcom does not maintain retail sales details on a hectare basis.
(8) Landcom does not maintain retail auction sales details on a hectare basis.
(9) (a) and (b) A small range of integrated housing projects were undertaken across various residential estates.
(c) 4.7 ha.
(d) 4.2 ha.
(e) 28.4 ha.
(10) (a) 22.75 ha.
(b) 44.82 ha.
(c) 68.18 ha.

195 COUNCIL ON THE COST OF GOVERNMENT—CHAIRMAN’S RESIGNATION—Mr Debnam to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

In relation to the appointment of the former Chairman of the Council on the Cost of Government, Professor Bob Walker—
(1) On what date did the former chairman give verbal notice of his resignation?
(2) On what date did the former chairman give written notice of his resignation?
(3) On what date did the former chairman’s remuneration cease?
(4) On what date did the former chairman’s resignation take effect?
(5) On what date did the Government give written acknowledgment of the former chairman’s resignation?

Answer—

(1) to (5) The tendering of the resignation of the chairman occurred in the context of discussions regarding his new role from July 1999 as chairman of the Superannuation Administration Corporation. These discussions covered the demands of the leadership of both the council and the corporation together with the professor’s academic responsibilities. The chairman verbally advised the council of his resignation at the council’s meeting on 28 September 1999, with a new chairman to succeed him from 1 November 1999.

196 STAMP DUTIES—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to NSW Government stamp duties—
(1) Has NSW Treasury prepared briefing papers on the implications of charging stamp duty on an after-GST basis?
(2) If so, what are the revenue implications for the 2000-01 Budget and forward estimates?

Answer—

The Treasurer has advised:
(1) Yes.
(2) Preliminary estimates indicate the overall effect on State revenues could be positive. These estimates are subject to much uncertainty.
In particular, it is extremely difficult to estimate the timing of the impact of the GST on State revenues and therefore the impact in 2000-01 and each of the forward estimates years. This is because it is uncertain how much of the impact on prices may be absorbed through competition and how long it will take for prices to fully adjust. For example, it is unclear to what extent and when the decrease in new vehicle prices will translate to used vehicle prices. Even greater uncertainty surrounds the impact on asset values, particularly land, new and established houses and commercial buildings.
The Treasurer has stated that if there were a net gain to the States resulting from the imposition of stamp duties on GST inclusive values, there would be a case for the States to vary the current stamp duty rates to take that into account. However, more information would be required before such action could be taken as the current estimates do not provide a reliable basis for policy action.

197 MONTHLY BUDGET REPORTS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to the monthly budget reports—
(1) What is the detailed basis for the budgeted loss of $99 million on the sale of non-current assets in the operating statement of the July 1999 monthly budget report?
(2) What is the breakdown of the June, July and August 1999 operating statement reports utilising the format used in the May 1999 monthly budget report?
(3) Will the September 1999 and future monthly reports utilise the operating statement format used in the May 1999 monthly budget report?
(4) Will the statements in future be released to the media, parliamentary library and posted on the Office of Financial Management’s website on the same day?
(5) If so, when will he initiate this action?

Answer—

The Treasurer has advised:
(1) The latest projection as at 31 October 1999 shows a revised budgeted loss of $83 million, which relates to the sale of the former State Bank of New South Wales.
(2) Provided as follows:

	Year to date June 1999 $ million	Year to date July 1999 $ million	Year to date August 1999 $ million
State Revenues
Stamp Duties		3,942	394747
Payroll Tax		3,605	353685
Gaming and Betting		1,419	123176
Land Tax		948	2034
Other Taxes and Levies		4,223	369668
Commonwealth Grants		8,911	7011,518
Dividends		942	27139
Tax Equivalent Payments		502	813
Sale of Goods and Services		2,448	193383
Investment Income		420	3951
Grants and Contributions		485	2466
Other Revenue		1,629	75178
Total State Revenues		29,474	2,3264,658
Expenses
Operating Expenses:
Employee Related	12,391	1,046	2,171
Other Operating Expenses	5,590	487	863
Maintenance		1,249	60132
Depreciation and Amortisation		1,294	84136
Grants and Subsidies		4,863	305663
Finance Costs		1,397	144261
Other Expenses		767	3459
Total Expenses		27,551	2,1604,285
Gain/(Loss) on Sale on			.
Non-Current Assets		84	…5
Surplus/(Deficit)		2,007	166378

(3) The September 1999 and future Monthly Reports will be standardised to agree with the formats used in NSW Consolidated Financial Statements. The main changes are:
· Other Revenue—other and Other Revenue—fines, fees have now been combined to produce the line Fines, Regulatory Fees & Other; and
· Taxation is shown as one line.
The dissection of Taxation into the separate components of Payroll Tax, Stamp Duties, etc., is revealed in the cash GFS Statement. (It should be noted that there will be a minor difference between cash and accrual.)
You will also note that in the most recent Consolidated Financial Statements, other expenses have been consolidated with other operating expenses. Additionally, employee-related expenses are separately reported from other operating expenses. Consequently, from the period ended 30 November 1999, employee-related expenses will be reported separately from other operating expenses. There will be no change to current revenue formats.
(4) It may be feasible to update the parliamentary library and the Office of Financial Management website within 24 hours of the public release.
(5) For the period ended 30 November 1999.

200 JOB SECURITY—GOULBURN RAILWAY WORKSHOPS—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) What action is being taken to implement his assurances to the Legislative Assembly on 28 October 1999 that Rail Services Australia (RSA) will provide more secure work for the workers at Goulburn’s railway workshops?
(2) Given his assurance that any changes to staffing at Goulburn’s railway workshops will be “... done in line with the Government’s commitment to the principle of voluntary redundancies”, will he confirm that there will be no forced redundancies at Goulburn’s workshops?
(3) Will he give rail workers in Goulburn an assurance that any joint venture arrangement between RSA and private interests, for example affecting Chullora workshops, will not lead to any downgrading of Goulburn’s workshops?

Answer—

(1) RSA workshops has a comprehensive and aggressive sales and marketing strategy. It maintains contact with all rail operators. There has been no maintenance work on the eastern seaboard that Workshops has not been aware of and where appropriate, tendered for.
(2) The Government’s policy is that there will be no forced redundancies.
(3) The proposed RSA/Alstom joint venture at Chullora is a separate issue from other workshops.

201 RETAIL PRICE—LPG—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Fair Trading and Minister for Sport and Recreation—

(1) Is he aware that in late October at country centres, including Goulburn, the retail price of LPG for portable gas containers has risen from 46 cents to 56 cents per litre, virtually overnight?
(2) Does he consider a sudden price hike of this extent to be unacceptable?
(3) As this represents an increase of more than 20 per cent, what action will he take in relation to companies supplying this product?

Answer—

(1) I am aware that there has been a significant increase in the retail price for LPG gas in New South Wales in recent months.
(2) LPG is an internationally traded commodity and, as such, local prices are set on the basis of import parity. I understand that the Saudi Aramco Contract Price (CP) for propane, which is the international benchmark for LPG producer prices, has risen significantly in recent months. The CP increased from US $133 per tonne in May 1999 to US $270 per tonne in October 1999.
I am advised that the Australian LPG Association has claimed that factors contributing to a rise in international prices include oil production cutbacks by OPEC countries, which has also affected LPG production, continued strong demand in the USA, China and India and anticipated higher demand from Japan and Korea.
(3) While the regulation of the petrol industry is primarily a Commonwealth responsibility, New South Wales has done what it can, in the face of Commonwealth inaction, to promote greater competition and fair trading in the petrol industry. New South Wales initiatives include working with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) in gathering evidence of breaches of the Trade Practices Act which may contribute to high petrol prices.
If there is evidence that the LPG prices mentioned by the member are due to breaches of the Trade Practices Act, the matter will be referred to the ACCC for investigation.

203 CASINO SURVEILLANCE DIVISION INVESTIGATION—Mr Rozzoli to the Minister for Gaming and Racing and Minister Assisting the Premier on Hunter Development—

(1) Was a Mr John Vincent Welch investigated by the Casino Surveillance Division of the Department of Gaming and Racing from December 1995 until April 1996?
(2) Was this investigation carried out at the request of the Casino Control Authority?
(3) Was the request made by the Casino Control Authority the result of referral of an Internal Audit Report by the then Chief Executive Officer of Sydney Harbour Casino to the Casino Control Authority?
(4) During the investigation was Mr John Vincent Welch placed on enforced sick leave by Sydney Harbour Casino when in fact Mr John Vincent Welch was not sick?
(5) Did Sydney Harbour Casino terminate Mr John Vincent Welch’s contract of employment during the investigation period and before a report was provided to the Casino Control Authority?
(6) Was this investigation completed and, if so, what was the date the report was forwarded to the Casino Control Authority?
(7) Has any action been taken to launch a prosecution, in the event of a finding of improper conduct, or has Mr John Vincent Welch been notified of a finding that there was no basis upon which action should have been taken to cancel his provisional “special employee” licence nor anything which detrimentally impacted upon his suitability to hold a “special employee” provisional licence?
(8) Given the investigation commenced in December 1995, will he now act upon the recommendations of the report or give a direction that the investigation or any enquiries arising therefrom, are drawn to a conclusion as swiftly as possible in the interests of fairness and justice?



Answer—

(1) Yes.
(2) Yes.
(3) The Casino Surveillance Division was conducting an investigation into Mr Vincent Welch’s application for a casino employee’s licence, as required by section 50 of the Casino Control Act.
(4) I do not know.
(5) Yes.
(6) 5 March 1996.
(7) I am advised that information concerning the Casino Surveillance Divsion’s investigations into casino operations is guarded by the secrecy provisions in section 148 of the Casino Control Act 1992, and is confidential.
(8) The Director reported to the Casino Control Authority on 5 March 1996.

204 ACID SOILS ACTION COMMITTEE FUNDING—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) Will the Government continue to fund the Acid Soils Action Committee after June 2000?
(2) If so, will the Government consider extending the enhancement funding for a period of 5 years, rather than 3 years, to ensure long-term projects can be successfully implemented?

Answer—

(1) NSW Agriculture is submitting an enhancement application to the NSW Treasury for funding to continue the Acid Soils Action program after June 2000. This application will be considered by the Budget Committee as part of the 2000-01 budget cycle.
(2) No. The enhancement application is for a 3-year period from July 2000 to June 2003. Funding beyond this term would be subject to submission of a further enhancement application and approval through the normal budget process.

THREATENED AND ENDANGERED FLORA—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—
(1) Will he confirm whether colonies of threatened and endangered species of Grevillea quadricauda and Quassia species “B” have been found near to the Pine Bush State Forest in northern New South Wales on land covered partially by a Voluntary Conservation Agreement concluded with the National Parks and Wildlife Service and the owner of land, and that the species have been found near to, but outside of the agreement area?
(2) (a) Will he confirm that a National Parks and Wildlife inspection conducted on or about 30 April 1999 established that only 15 plants of the above-mentioned threatened or endangered species were found?
(b) Given evidence of there being more than 500 such plants in the area in 1998, will he confirm this represents a 97 per cent reduction in the number of plant stocks?
(c) What reason can he give for the reduction in these plant stocks?
(3) Does he remain satisfied that the area covered by the Voluntary Conservation Agreement, and that adjacent to the agreement area, is more than adequately protected?
(4) Acknowledging an absence of a power to compel a land owner to extend or alter a Voluntary Conservation Agreement, will he advise of his intention to seek a review of the Voluntary Conservation Agreement with the land owner?





Answer—

(1) Individuals of these plant species have been recorded near Pine Brush State Forest, but the known population of Quassia sp. B. lies outside the area covered by the Voluntary Conservation Agreement.
(2) (a) An inspection of part of this area conducted by the National Parks and Wildlife Service noted approximately 15 Quassia sp. B. plants. The species Grevillea quadricauda was not specifically searched for.
(b) The inspection was not aimed at estimating the population of Quassia sp. B., nor did it cover the entire area which the species inhabits. The contention that 500 plants were previously present has not been verified. Identification of the Quassia sp. B. species can be difficult. A relatively common species, Rapanea sp. also occurs in the area and can be easily mistaken for Quassia sp. B.
(c) There is no evidence that plant numbers have declined.
(3) The inspection revealed that the area covered by the Voluntary Conservation Agreement is adequately protected. The known population of Quassia sp. B. lies outside the area covered by the Agreement. The Agreement was negotiated prior to the discovery of the species in the area.
Protection of the population is subject to the provisions of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. The National Parks and Wildlife Service inspection revealed no indication of any processes which could be threatening the continued existence of the species in the area such as cattle grazing, bush rock collection or unsustainable logging.
(4) The NPWS has previously sought an extension of the boundary of the Voluntary Conservation Agreement with the land owner to include the Quassia sp. B. population. However, the land owner has indicated a reluctance to do so and the NPWS has no power to compel any such extension.

207 WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUMS—COAL INDUSTRY—Mr Souris to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

(1) Has the Joint Coal Board recently announced an increase for the coal industry workers compensation premiums and a special 12-month levy on premiums?
(2) What is the average premium increase across the coal industry?
(3) What is the average 12-month special levy being placed on policy holders?
(4) What do the increases amount to in percentage terms of payroll for open cut and underground coal mine policy holders?

Answer—

(1) Yes. The Joint Coal Board has recently increased premiums and introduced a special levy to address increases in workers compensation costs flowing from the downsizing that has occurred in recent years in the New South Wales coal industry.
(2) The average workers compensation premium across the New South Wales coal industry is projected to be 6.6 per cent in 1999-2000. The actual average premium rate paid for 1998-99 was 6 per cent.
(3) The average special levy payable is 1.3 per cent of payroll.
(4) In 1998-99 the average workers compensation premium rates for New South Wales coal mines were 4.2 per cent of payroll for open cuts and 7.7 per cent of payroll for underground mines.
In 1999-2000 the average workers’ compensation premium rates for open cuts is estimated to be 4.8 per cent and for underground mines it is estimated to be 8.5 per cent.
When the special levy is included these rates become 5.76 per cent for open cuts and 10.2 per cent for underground mines.

208 WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUMS—COAL INDUSTRY—Mr Souris to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

(1) What steps is he taking to reduce the spiralling costs of workers compensation premiums in the coal industry?
(2) Is the average premium rate for underground mines double that of Queensland and the average premium for open cut mines is triple that of Queensland?

Answer—

(1) The special levy on New South Wales coal mines is paying for a temporary increase in workers compensation costs for employees injured in the New South Wales coal industry as employees leave the industry and those employees’ outstanding claims are finalised.
This trend is not projected to continue and therefore cannot be said to be “spiralling”.
An external actuarial review has been commissioned of the cost drivers for the passing peak of compensation costs so as to ensure that strategies are appropriately in place to guarantee that workers compensation for New South Wales coal miners remains fully funded as it has been for over 50 years.
The Joint Coal Board is actively meeting with the industry at the coal mine level to discuss individual premium increases and to help to devise specific strategies to avoid excessive costs where this is ethical and appropriate.
(2) The projected average premium rate for 1999-2000 for open cut mines in New South Wales is 4.8 per cent (before the special levy) compared with a projected average in Queensland for open cut mines of 1.8 per cent.
The average premium rate for underground mines in New South Wales is 8.5 per cent (before the special levy) compared to a projected average premium in Queensland of 5 per cent.

209 WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUMS—COAL INDUSTRY—Mr Souris to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

(1) What representations has he received from the coal industry concerning workers compensation premium increases?
(2) Will the premium increases and special 12-month levy lead to job losses in the coal industry?

Answer—

(1) I have received no specific representations on this issue. However, I am aware of representations made to other members of the Government by industry representatives.
(2) There has been a persistent average decrease in the number employed in the industry with marked acceleration in the last 2 years. There was no levy in the period of these figures.
There is inadequate evidence to state that the increases in premiums and the application of the special levy will, of themselves, lead to job losses in the coal industry.
However, it would not be appropriate to compare these figures as they do not reflect the cost of workers injuries in the coal industry in the two States.
Importantly, there are additional costs to employers in the Queensland coal industry that are not reflected in the premiums. Queensland employers are subject to an uninsurable employer excess of 4 days’ wages on each claim, whereas the New South Wales scheme picks up the wages of injured workers from day one. The Queensland scheme provides benefits based only on award rates of pay (exclusive of penalties and over-award payments) rather than normal weekly earnings. However, under the relevant industrial awards, Queensland employers are required to top-up injured workers pay to their normal weekly earnings—a direct and substantial cost to coal industry employers that is additional to their workers compensation premium. Under the New South Wales scheme, employers are covered for the full amount of injured workers’ normal weekly earnings.
It should also be noted that the Queensland scheme has just lifted a levy of 10 per cent which had been in place for several years.
In the past the New South Wales coal industry has supported an experientially-based insurance scheme whereby companies bear the major costs of their workers’ injuries. That is, cross-subsidisation is kept to a minimum. An indirect consequence of this low cross-subsidy is a certain volatility in premiums which has benefits, such as the premium rebates which were given to policy holders from 1991 to 1994, and down-sides, such as the levy imposed this year.

210 X-RAY SERVICES—WAUCHOPE DISTRICT HOSPITAL—Mr Stoner to the Minister for Health—

In relation to the Wauchope District Hospital—
(1) Why have out-of-hours x-ray services been curtailed?
(2) Will such services be reinstated?
(3) If so, when?

Answer—

(1) There is not a sufficient level of demand for this service. In the past 3 years (1996-97 to 1998-99), the service has treated a total of 261 patients: 85 in 1996-97; 86 in 1997-98; and 90 in 1998-99. Radiology services are available in Port Macquarie, 15 minutes drive from Wauchope.
(2) and (3) The situation will be monitored on an ongoing basis.

211 MANNING BASE HOSPITAL—INFRASTRUCTURE—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) What is the clinical level attached to Manning Base Hospital?
(2) Does the present and proposed infrastructure (after building is completed) of Manning Base Hospital comply with the clinical level attached to the hospital?
(3) If not, in what areas is there non-compliance?
(4) If not, what will be done to install the necessary infrastructure to comply with the clinical level status?
(5) If not, when will such infrastructure be installed?
(6) Are medical procedures presently being undertaken at the hospital which should not be carried out with the present lack of infrastructure?
(7) Could patient safety be jeopardised by not having the necessary infrastructure in place in the hospital?

Answer—

(1) B2—Major Non Metropolitan.
(2) to (5) The redeveloped Manning Base Hospital will meet the criteria in the NSW Department of Health’s “Guide to the Role Delineation of Health Services”.
(6) No.
(7) The Area Health Service is responsible for ensuring that the level of services provided are appropriate and safe.

212 SYDNEY CYCLEWAY PROJECTS—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) In the cycleways masterplan for Sydney, which councils will receive funding for the installation of various facilities such as parking and storage at various venues?
(2) How much will each council receive?
(3) Will councils in Sydney be required to fund Sydney cycleway projects on a 50-50 shared basis as will be the case in rural areas?
(4) How many kilometres of cycleways in total will be built in Sydney over the next decade?

Answer—

(1) Funding assistance for facilities, such as bicycle parking and storage, will be assessed as requests are received from councils and will be determined on a basis of needs, having regard to overall priorities for such facilities. Bicycle parking and storage facilities are identified in individual council’s local bike plans and, subject to assessment, the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) will provide half of the cost involved.
(2) The level of funding will vary, depending on the particular cost of each facility.
(3) Councils in Sydney will be required to fund cycleway projects on a 50-50 shared basis. The RTA will provide 100 per cent funding for principal regional bicycle links (sections of these links may use local roads) and for cycleways constructed as part of new road works on State Roads.
(4) 420 km of major off-road cycleways and 214 km of major links on quiet streets will be built over the next decade.

213 ILLEGAL ACTIVITY—SEPP 14 WETLANDS, HEXHAM—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) Is he aware of any illegal activities that have occurred on property known as Lot 312 deposited plan 583724 being land comprised in certificate of title Volume 13186 Folio 189 being land existing in SEPP 14 Wetlands at Hexham?
(2) If so, what has he done to remedy any illegal act or omission under any Act or Regulation in connection with the said property?
(3) If nothing, why not?
(4) Are there any tyres stored on the subject property?
(5) If so, is there any possibility of zinc and cadmium leachate occurring from the long-term storage of any tyres on the subject land?
(6) If so, what action will the department take in relation to this possibility?
(7) If any action is taken, when will it be taken?
(8) If no action is to be taken, why not?

Answer—

(1) I am advised that the matters relate to a failure by the property owner, Mr Ronald David Smith, to comply with orders of the Land and Environment Court in 1987 resulting from action brought by Newcastle City Council under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. The orders relate to the removal of illegal building structures and the storage of materials including tyres and building wastes on the property.
(2) and (3) Newcastle City Council and not the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) is the consent authority under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act for matters relating to illegal building works. Council is also the appropriate regulatory authority under the Protection of the Environment (Operations) Act in relation to matters such as the dumping of wastes on the property. The EPA is not aware of specific action taken by council to enforce the court orders. However, officers from the council, EPA and the Department of Land and Water Conservation jointly inspected the site on 18 October 1999. The EPA has provided technical advice to council on the options available for controlling waste dumping on the property.
(4) Yes.
(5) I am advised that the very low rate at which metals such as zinc and cadmium leach from stockpiled tyres is unlikely to result in a significant impact on the environment.
(6) The EPA will continue to provide council with appropriate technical advice and support in relation to this issue.
(7) and (8) I am advised that at the abovementioned inspection of 18 October 1999, there were no visible signs that tyres and building wastes on the site were adversely impacting on water quality in the wetland. The EPA understands that council will continue surveillance of the property to detect any further illegal waste dumping on the premises.

214 COWRA-BLAYNEY RAIL LINE UPGRADE—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) When will present upgrading on the Cowra-Blayney rail line be completed?
(2) What will be the carrying capacity of the line?
(3) Will the rail line be for freight or tourism or both?

Answer—

I am advised by the Rail Access Corporation of the following:
(1) The line will be completed by December 1999 as scheduled.
(2) The carrying capacity of the line will be 19 tonnes.
(3) Both freight and tourism operators will be offered access to the line.

215 TRANSPORT CORRIDOR RESTRICTIONS—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

Will industries in the Central West be adversely affected by transport corridor restrictions over the Blue Mountains before and during the 2000 Olympic Games?

Answer—

Transport planning for the Olympic Games is co-ordinated by the Olympic Roads and Transport Authority (ORTA), which reports to the Minister for the Olympics. This question should be referred to the Minister for the Olympics.

216 FREIGHT—BLAYNEY-COWRA RAIL LINE—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) When will the Blayney-Cowra rail line be officially reopened?
(2) What class of locomotive will be allowed to operate on this upgraded line?
(3) What will the working speed of the locomotives be on this line?
(4) Will the present freight trains using the western line be able to divert onto this line?
(5) (a) Will the western line rail freight be diverted away from the Blue Mountains line during the 2000 Olympic Games?
(b) If so, what alternative routes will be used?

Answer—

I am advised by the Rail Access Corporation of the following:
(1) The line will be completed by December 1999 as scheduled.
(2) With the exception of 81, 82 and National Rail class, all locomotives will be able to operate on the line.
(3) In accordance with relevant safe working standards, speed restrictions will be in place due to curvature of the line.
(4) Freight trains currently using the western line will not divert onto this line.
(5) (a) and (b) Transport planning for the Olympic Games is co-ordinated by the Olympic Roads and Transport Authority (ORTA), which reports to the Minister for the Olympics. This questions should be referred to the Minister for the Olympics.

217 PROPOSED RING ROAD—QUEANBEYAN—Mr Webb to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Can he provide answers to the Queanbeyan City Council’s request for information into the feasibility of the proposed ring road?
(2) Can he also report on the findings of the RTA review committee which was due to deliver its report at the end of September?

Answer—

(1) and (2) A report on options to reduce heavy usage of Monaro Street, Queanbeyan, has been prepared in close consultation with officers of Queanbeyan City Council.
The report identifies seven options for reducing heavy vehicle usage of Monaro Street ranging from low cost to high cost and recommends short, medium and long-term strategies. Council has been in possession of a draft version of the report since the end of August 1999 pending release of the final report.

218 TIMBER WORKERS—BOMBALA—Mr Webb to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) How many timber workers lost jobs as a result of forest restructure in Bombala?
(2) How many were promised replacement jobs in NPWS?
(3) Were any of these replacement jobs located in Bombala?
(4) Who was appointed to these jobs, and where was their previous place of employment and employer?

Answer—

(1) This question should be referred to my colleague the Hon Kim Yeadon MP, Minister for Forestry, as the Forestry Industrial Structural Adjustment Unit is within his portfolio.
(2) No individual has been promised a position in the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS). However, displaced timber workers can be given priority consideration for temporary employment as field officers with the NPWS under the Forestry Industry Structural Adjustment Process (FISAP).
(3) There are three NPWS field officer positions at Bombala that have been created as a result of the Regional Forest Assessment process. These positions will be available to displaced timber workers and will be filled in accordance with the FISAP agreement.
(4) Timber workers have not yet filled these positions as the sawmill in Bombala has not yet closed. The positions will be offered under the FISAP agreement when the mill closes.

219 SMALL BUSINESS—QUEANBEYAN—Mr Webb to the Minister for Small Business and Minister for Tourism—

(1) Would she confirm her office’s knowledge of the plight of small business in Monaro Street, Queanbeyan?
(2) Could she also confirm as to whether or not her office has been liaising with the Ministry of Transport in respect to the proposed Queanbeyan ring road?
(3) Could she confirm whether her office is currently in contact with the office of the Minister for Regional Development in regard to Queanbeyan being the next New South Wales regional growth centre?

Answer—

(1) I am aware of the plight of small business in Monaro Street, Queanbeyan. High numbers of shop vacancies in Monaro Street has largely come about from past decisions on development issues and changing lifestyles and shopping patterns of the people of Queanbeyan following the opening of two major shopping centre developments.
(2) I understand the RTA is currently reviewing proposals for an alternative ring road for heavy road transport around Queanbeyan and the feasibility of that project. I am pleased to see the strong support of Queanbeyan City Council, Queanbeyan Business Enterprise Centre and Yarrowlumla Shire in working with Government to develop strategies for growth and the revitalisation of Monaro Street and the rest of the Queanbeyan central business district.
(3) Since the announcement in March this year that Queanbeyan would be included in the Country Centres Growth Strategy, both Minister Woods and the Department of State and Regional Development have met on several occasions with key industry leaders, local government and community representatives to discuss the development of the strategy. I am happy to provide any assistance from my portfolio where required.

10 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 20)

220 TRANSIT POLICE—Ms Allan to the Minister for Police—

How many transit police are stationed at Wentworthville Police Station?

Answer—

Transit police are attached to Local Area Commands and Regions, rather than particular stations.

221 COMPUTERS IN SCHOOLS—Ms Allan to the Minister for Education and Training—

How many computers have been installed in schools in the electorate of Wentworthville since 1995?

Answer—

Under the Computers in Schools program the equivalent of 90,000 computers have been distributed to all Government and non-Government schools in New South Wales since 1995.
Over $1.2 million has been spent between 1995 and 1999 to provide 717 computer entitlements for schools in the Wentworthville electorate. In addition 133 teachers in Wentworthville schools have been trained under the Technology in Learning and Teaching (TILT) program. Schools have flexibility in the form that this allocation takes from a range of computer equipment including laptops, desktops and network file servers.
Over the next 4 years all existing computers will be replaced and an additional 25,000 will be provided to New South Wales schools.
The Computer Coordination Allowance in 1999-2000 will provide assistance of $20 million for New South Wales schools. Schools can choose to spend this money according to their own needs which may include:
· the hiring of relief staff to allow permanent staff to train colleagues in using computers;
· the hiring of technicians;
· the pooling of allocations with other schools to employ special computer co-ordinators;
· the setting up of technology support contracts;
· the supply of educational software; and
· extending computer resources such as cabling and networking.
In 1998-99, schools received a one-off technology grant totalling $7.2 million across New South Wales for additional support with cabling, networking, power points and training and development. This was based on the number of computers already received by schools.

222 FLOOD MITIGATION—Ms Allan to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) How much money has been spent on flood mitigation by the State Government since 1995 in the electorate of Wentworthville?
(2) What contribution has the Federal Government made to local flood mitigation in New South Wales since 1995?

Answer—

(1) Since 1995, the Upper Parramatta River Catchment Trust has not constructed any State or Commonwealth funded flood mitigation works within the boundaries of the Wentworthville electorate. However, during this period $2.3 million of State funds were made available to allow completion of the Darling Mills Creek Flood Mitigation Scheme. This scheme provides benefits to sections of a number of electorates, including Wentworthville.
(2) Commonwealth Government funding to flood mitigation within New South Wales since 1995 has been as follows:

Year	Commonwealth Funds
1995-96	$7.000 million
1996-97	$5.700 million
1997-98	$4.643 million
1998-99	$3.753 million
1999-2000	$5.400 million

223 ALFORDS POINT BRIDGE—Mr Ashton to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

Can he advise why the middle lane of the Alfords Point Bridge between Padstow Heights and Alfords Point over the Georges River is permanently closed to traffic on weekends?

Answer—

The decision to close the centre lane on the Alfords Point Bridge during non-peak periods was made in mid-1996 following a fatal head-on collision on the bridge. At the time, there was wide community support for the measure.
The width of the bridge is such that it is not possible or practicable to provide a physical barrier for opposing traffic. In determining the usage of the middle lane, traffic flow capacity and road safety considerations relating to the proximity of opposing traffic flows are taken into account.
The middle lane is open to traffic during the week as significant delays would be experienced if it were closed. However, vehicle speeds tend to increase on weekends when traffic is lighter, resulting in an increase in the severity of accidents. Since the inception of the weekend closure of the middle lane, while minor delays are experienced, there has been a significant reduction in severe accidents.



224 ALFORDS POINT BRIDGE—Mr Ashton to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) Can he examine the possibility of opening the middle lane to traffic on the Alfords Point Bridge to alleviate traffic delays?
(2) Can he examine why the middle lane cannot be opened permanently in at least one direction to facilitate the flow of traffic on weekends?

Answer—

(1) As advised in my answer to Question No 223, since the inception of the weekend closure of the middle lane of the Alfords Point Bridge there has been a significant reduction in severe accidents.
The opening of the middle lane during the weekend would compromise road safety. Accordingly, there is no proposal to open this lane on weekends.
(2) See (1) above.
225 VOLUNTARY EXIT PROGRAM—SYDNEY WATER CORPORATION—Mr Brogden to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—
(1) How many employees of the Sydney Water Corporation applied for early retirement under the voluntary exit program by 31 October 1999?
(2) Of these, how many offers were accepted by the Sydney Water Corporation?
(3) What is the total cost of the voluntary exit program?

Answer—

(1) 954 as at 31 October 1999.
(2) 397 as at 31 October 1999.
(3) Sydney Water has advised that the budgeted figure for the current program included in its Statement of Corporate Intent was $78 million and that the total cost was forecast to be something less than that.
226 SUPERANNUATION ADMINISTRATION CORPORATION—APPOINTMENT OF CHAIRMAN—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to the appointment of Professor Walker as the Chairman of the Superannuation Administration Corporation—
(1) What is the period of his appointment?
(2) Is the appointment formalised in a contract or written arrangement?
(3) If so:
(a) Are there any confidential clauses and, if so, on what topics?
(b) Does the appointment acknowledge any other NSW Government appointments for Professor Walker and, if so, which ones?
(4) Does the appointment provide for reimbursement of personal expenses and, if so, on what basis?
(5) Does the appointment include a review period and, if so, when and who will conduct the review?
(6) Does the appointment include any performance criteria and, if so, what are the criteria?
(7) Have any SAC Board Members or Senior Executives left the organisation since Professor Walker’s appointment and, if so, what are their names, positions previously held and reasons for departure?

Answer—

The Treasurer has advised:
(1) Professor Walker’s appointment is for a 5-year term, expiring in July 2004.
(2) Yes.
(3) (a) There are no confidential clauses in the letter of appointment.
(b) The Shareholders Form notes that Professor Walker was at the time of his appointment Chair of the Council on the Cost of Government.
(4) In terms of Schedule 8 (6) of the State Owned Corporations Act 1989, Professor Walker “is entitled to be paid such remuneration (including travel and subsistence allowances) as the voting shareholders may from time to time determine.” The letter of appointment did not mention any remuneration for personal expenses.
(5) There is no review period specified in the letter of appointment.
(6) As is the case for all board members of State Owned Corporations, the chairman’s performance is reviewed, along with the corporation’s overall performance, through the Statement of Corporate Intent and half-yearly reporting regime set out in Part 4 (“Accountability”) of the State Owned Corporations Act 1989. The chairman is also bound by section 10 of the Act—“Duties and liabilities of directors and other officers.”
(7) No board members have left since Professor Walker’s appointment. Listed below are the senior executive staff who have left since his appointment. The reasons for their departure are confidential between the individual and the board.
· Thuy Mellor—Chief Executive Officer.
· Michael Smith—Client Relationship Manager.
227 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE—ON-LINE PUBLISHING—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Public Works and Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on Citizenship—

In relation to the New South Wales Government Gazette—
(1) How much has been budgeted for the cost of publishing the Gazette on the Internet?
(2) When will the Gazette be published on the Internet?

Answer—

(1) For 1999-2000 no specific funding has been allocated for publishing the Government Gazette on the Internet.
(2) In accordance with the Government’s commitment to electronic facilitation of business, detailed assessments on the options available for Internet publishing are currently under consideration. No firm proposals are yet available.
228 GOVERNMENT CREDIT CARD USE—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Small Business and Minister for Tourism—

In relation to NSW Government credit card use—
(1) How many ministerial staff members as at 9 November 1999 have NSW Government credit cards?
(2) How many departmental officers as at 9 November 1999 have NSW Government credit cards?
(3) Which ministerial and departmental staff positions have a credit card, including a Cabcharge card, as at 9 November 1999?
(4) What total costs were charged to NSW Government credit cards by:
(a) total ministerial staff for the financial year 1998-99?
(b) total departmental staff for financial year 1998-99?
(5) Has she or her department approved any variances to the Premier’s Department Guidelines for the use of NSW Government credit cards and, if so, what variances?

Answer—

(1) to (5) Provision of credit cards to public servants, ministerial staff and Ministers are covered in Premier’s and Treasury memoranda.
The cost to the public of the diversion of resources necessary to answer this question in greater detail is not justifiable.

229 BEN CHIFLEY DAM—WORKS COSTS—Mr D.L. Page to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—
(1) Did the cost of raising the Ben Chifley Dam blow out from $24 million to $30 million?
(2) Was the Department of Public Works and Services responsible for this underestimation of costs?
(3) Why were the true costs underestimated?
(4) If the Department of Public Works and Services was responsible for underestimating the true cost, why won’t the State Government pay for the whole of the blow out?
(5) Did the Mayor of Bathurst City Council describe this blow out as “scandalous”?
(6) (a) Was he correct?
(b) If not, why not?

Answer—

(1) The main contract for the raising of Ben Chifley Dam was recently awarded to the lowest tenderer for an amount of $24.6 million of an estimated total project cost of $30 million.
(2) The Department of Public Works and Services (DPWS) is the project manager. An independent check of the design and estimate for the contract work was carried out before the project went out to tender and these were found to be adequate.
(3) Competitive tendering and market forces determine the final price. All projects of this nature are subject to unforseen variations in cost such as changes in foundation geotechnical conditions. Estimates prior to tender are based on the knowledge of scope of work and prevailing prices at the time. However, market forces at the time of tendering affect prices.
(4) The funds for this project come from the Country Towns Water Supply and Sewerage Program which assists councils to provide appropriate water supply and sewerage infrastructure. Under program policy, the maximum subsidy available to councils is 50 per cent. The Government has committed to providing half of the actual final cost.
(5) and (6) Comments on this project attributed to the Mayor of Bathurst City Council, Mr Ian Macintosh, have been reported in the Western Advocate. Questions on these comments should be raised with the Mayor.
230 YANCO POLICE STATION—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Police—

Could he advise on the future of the Yanco Police Station?

Answer—

The Commander of Griffith Local Area Command has advised that the policing of Yanco will continue to be a priority for his Command.

231 INFRINGEMENT NOTICES—DELIVERY—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Police—
(1) Since 1995, how many drivers in New South Wales have had their licences cancelled due to infringement notices delivered to residential addresses rather than postal addresses?
(2) Is the automated access system, which will use the postal address to deliver infringement notices, now in place?
(3) If not, when will it be in operation?
(4) What is the reason for the delay?



Answer—
(1) I am advised that the Infringement Processing Bureau does not have access to such data.
(2) to (4) I am advised that the RTA and the Police Service have given priority to finalising Year 2000 compliance testing and further discussions will take place in the new year.
232 GEORGES RIVER—STREAMWATCH PROGRAM—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—
(1) How many schools and community groups are actively involved in the Streamwatch Program on the Georges River?
(2) Which groups and schools, and what are their areas of study on the river?
(3) How many schools and community groups were involved in 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively?

Answer—

(1) 45.
(2)

Streamwatch Group	Site (if applicable)
All Saints Catholic Boys College, Liverpool	Georges River Weir
Ambarvale High School
Ashcroft High School	Spring Creek
Bankstown Grammar School	Cabramatta Creek
Birrong Boys High School
Birrong Primary School	Maluga Passive Reserve
Blakehurst High School	Kogarah Bay Creek
Bonnet Bay Public School
Canley Vale High School
Casula High School	Heathcote Creek
Casula Public School	Orphan School Creek
Chester Hill High School
Condell Park High School	Georges River
Fairfield High School	Prospect Creek
Georges Hall Primary School	Prospect Creek, Fairfield
Heathcote Public School
Hinchinbrook Public School	Hinchinbrook Creek
Holsworthy High School	Harris Creek
Hoxton Park Primary School	Hinchinbrook Creek
Hurlstone Agricultural High School	Bunbury Curran Creek
Inaburra High School
Kurnell Public School	Marton Park
Liverpool Girls High School
Liverpool Public School
Liverpool West Primary School
Lucas Heights Community School
Lurnea High School	Brickmakers Creek
Menai High School
Menai Public School	Mill Creek
Moorebank High School	Chauvel Park
Mortdale Public School
Patrician Brothers College, Fairfield	Prospect Creek
Peakhurst High School	Depot Road Drain, Mortdale
Penshurst Public School
Revesby Public School
Rosemeadow Public School
South Hurstville Public School
St Francis Xaviers School	Wolli Creek
St Helens Park Public School
St Josephs, Oatley
St Therese School, Padstow	Little Salt Pan Creek
St Thomas More Primary School	Smiths Creek
Sylvania High School	Gwawley Creek
Sylvania Public School
Westfields Sports High School

(3) The number of groups testing in the Georges River catchment during 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 are listed in the table below:



Calendar Year	1996	1997	1998	1999
Number of Streamwatch groups	33	38	40	45


235 PENSIONER RAIL TRAVEL—Mr Stoner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

In relation to Countrylink services on the North Coast of New South Wales—
(1) What is the formula for allocating seats for free rail travel for pensioners?
(2) Has this formula been changed at any time in the last 5 years?
(3) What has been the effect, if any, on the quantity of free seats available to pensioners?

Answer—

I am advised by Countrylink of the following:
(1) to (3) 30 per cent of all seats are allocated to pensioner travel voucher holders, except in peak travel times when it is 20 per cent. This formula commenced on 1 January 1996. Countrylink monitors seat allocation to ensure that demand from all sectors is accommodated where possible.

236 SOUTH WEST ROCKS AMBULANCE STATION—Mr Stoner to the Minister for Public Works and Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on Citizenship—

When will construction commence on the new South West Rocks ambulance station?

Answer—

I am advised that work on the new ambulance station at South West Rocks will commence during the term of the current Government.

237 CLINICAL EFFICIENCIES—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) What are clinical efficiencies?
(2) What clinical efficiencies are to be put into place in the Mid North Coast Area Health Service, broken down to each service provider?

Answer—

(1) Clinical efficiencies are any actions or decisions taken to make clinical services provided by health services more efficient.
(2) The time and resources required to answer this question cannot be justified.

238 ELECTIVE SURGERY—MID NORTH COAST AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is elective surgery to be cut in the hospitals serviced by the Mid North Coast Area Health Service?
(2) If so, what cuts will occur in each of the hospitals in the Service’s area?
(3) If so, why will the cuts occur to elective surgery?
Answer—

(1) to (3) Elective surgery levels are the responsibility of hospital managers and Area Health Services. These levels are partly determined by seasonal demand.
The NSW Department of Health will soon be publishing elective surgery waiting lists on the Internet to assist general practitioners in helping patients with their options.
239 RURAL AND REGIONAL CYCLEWAYS—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Will there be any consultation with Tourism NSW as to the positioning of new signs, or the repositioning of signs already in place, to aid the tourism industry in relation to the installation of new or extended cycleways throughout rural and regional New South Wales?
(2) Will Tourism NSW be consulted in the building of cycleways in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong in terms of contributing to the promotion of the tourism industry through tourist attractions along these cycleways?

Answer—

(1) The Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) works with Tourism NSW in relation to tourism issues across the State. When new or extended cycleways through rural and regional New South Wales are to be installed, the RTA will work with Tourism NSW on a case by case basis to ensure that appropriate signage is provided to aid the tourist industry. The RTA already promotes tourist attractions along its cycleways, including the Tracker Riley Cycleway in Dubbo where signs directing people to Dubbo Zoo have been provided.
(2) Tourism NSW is consulted in regard to the building of cycleways in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong that have tourist attractions along the cycleway routes.
Many cycleways alongside tourist attractions are part of councils’ local bicycle networks and, as such, Tourism NSW would have a role in decisions made by those councils on the building and signposting of their cycleways that would aid the tourism industry.

240 FREIGHT RESTRICTIONS—GREAT WESTERN HIGHWAY—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

What freight restrictions are proposed to be in force on the Great Western Highway prior and during the 2000 Olympic Games?

Answer—

Transport planning for the Olympic Games is co-ordinated by the Olympic Roads and Transport Authority (ORTA), which reports to the Minister for the Olympics. This question should be referred to the Minister for the Olympics.

11 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 21)

244 COMMUNITY GROUP—FUNDING—Ms Allan to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

How many community groups in the electorate of Wentworthville receive funding from her department?

Answer—

There are 19 disability group homes in the electorate of Wentworthville funded by the Ageing and Disability Department. These include 5 run by non-Government organisations and 14 run by the Department of Community Services.
245 WESTPAC CLOSURE—PENDLE HILL—Ms Allan to the Minister for Fair Trading and Minister for Sport and Recreation—

What action will he take to stop Westpac closing its Pendle Hill branch?

Answer—

I share the concerns of the Member for Wentworthville regarding closures such as these, which mean that older people, the less mobile and parents with small children have to travel much further to access face to face banking services, because there are many times when an ATM is not enough.
Because of the continuing program of closures I am keeping up the pressure on banks by conveying the community concerns to the banks and to the Commonwealth Government.
Following my submission of a paper on banking and community service obligations to the Ministerial Council on Consumer Affairs (MCCA) in August 1999, I have recently written to the Prime Minister requesting that the Federal Government require banks to honour certain community service obligations as part of their licence conditions.
In addition, I have written to the Federal Minister for Financial Services and Regulation, the Hon Joe Hockey MP, requesting progress reports on studies being undertaken on the supply of banking services to regional areas.

246 BANKSTOWN HOSPITAL—Mr Ashton to the Minister for Health—

Can he advise of the likely timetable for the reopening of Ward 3A at Bankstown Hospital?

Answer—

At the commencement of winter 1999 the hospital made available additional seasonal beds and as winter is now past the demand for the additional capacity is reduced so the bed capacity was adjusted, as is normal management practice.

247 GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS—STLD POSITIONS—Mr Ashton to the Minister for Education and Training—

Could he provide a proposed breakdown of changes to the allocation of STLD positions at government schools in the East Hills electorate?

Answer—

The Secondary Principals Council and the Primary Principals Association have both called on the Government to implement new procedures for allocating support teacher learning difficulties (STLD) positions to schools to provide an equitable distribution of targeted resources across the State based on identified need. After consultation with both organisations, the policy for the allocation of STLD positions has been adjusted accordingly.
In the East Hills electorate, 15 schools will have the same STLD entitlement, 5 will be reduced and 1 will be increased. The net result of the statewide redistribution on the basis of identified need is a 1.9 position reduction in the allocation to schools in the East Hills electorate.
The Government has also established a District-based Learning Difficulties Support Team which will work with a flexible caseload across the district. In the Bankstown District, the team has 1 Assistant Principal (Learning Difficulties) and 1.6 STLD (2.6 positions in total).
This will ensure that a high level of support is available to the students in the East Hills electorate who need it.



248 GOVERNMENT CREDIT CARDS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to NSW Government credit card use—
(1) How many ministerial staff members as at 9 November 1999 have NSW Government credit cards?
(2) How many departmental officers as at 9 November 1999 have NSW Government credit cards?
(3) Which ministerial and departmental staff positions have a credit card, including a Cabcharge card, as at 9 November 1999?
(4) What total costs were charged to NSW Government credit cards by:
(a) total ministerial staff for the financial year 1998-99?
(b) total departmental staff for the financial year 1998-99?
(5) (a) Has he or his department approved any variances to the Premier’s Department Guidelines for the use of NSW Government credit cards?
(b) If so, what variances?

Answer—

(1) to (5) Provision of credit cards to public servants, ministerial staff and Ministers are covered in Premier’s and Treasury memoranda.
The cost to the public of the diversion of resources necessary to answer this question in greater detail is not justifiable.

249 MINISTERIAL TRAVEL—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to ministerial travel—
(1) Will he be travelling out of New South Wales or Australia during the coming parliamentary recess?
(2) Will staff, public servants or members be accompanying him?
(3) What are their names?
(4) What class of travel and accommodation will each person be using?
(5) What are the anticipated individual and total costs budgeted for each trip?
(6) Where and for how many days in each place will he be absent?
(7) What is the stated purpose of each trip?

Answer—

(1) to (7) Overseas travel by Ministers forms part of their responsibilities to maximise trade, investment and other opportunities for New South Wales.

250 MINISTERIAL TRAVEL—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Small Business and Minister for Tourism—

In relation to ministerial travel—
(1) Will she be travelling out of New South Wales or Australia during the coming parliamentary recess?
(2) Will staff, public servants or members be accompanying her?
(3) What are their names?
(4) What class of travel and accommodation will each person be using?
(5) What are the anticipated individual and total costs budgeted for each trip?
(6) Where and for how many days in each place will she be absent?
(7) What is the stated purpose of each trip?




Answer—

(1) to (7) Overseas travel by Ministers forms part of their responsibilities to maximise trade investment and other opportunities for New South Wales.

251 POLICE STRENGTH AT PARRAMATTA—Ms Harrison to the Minister for Police—

What are current police numbers at Parramatta and how does this compare to the last year of Coalition Government?

Answer—

I am advised that, as at 19 November 1999, Parramatta Local Area Command had an actual strength of 167 officers.
I am advised that, as at 3 January 1995, the Parramatta patrol had an actual strength of 144 officers, 23 fewer than now.

252 FUNDING—WESTMEAD HOSPITAL—Ms Harrison to the Minister for Health—

(1) What was the State Government funding for Westmead Hospital in the 1994-95 budget?
(2) What is the funding in the 1999-2000 budget?

Answer—

(1) and (2) I am advised that funding in the 1999-2000 budget for Westmead Hospital is $265.9 million, which is $59.3 million or 28.7 per cent higher than the comparable 1994-95 budget of $206.6 million.

253 PLATFORM EXIT—PARRAMATTA STATION—Ms Harrison to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

When will the middle exit gate on platforms 4 and 1 at Parramatta Station be reopened?

Answer—

I am advised by CityRail of the following:
The middle exit gate adjacent to platform 1 is open during morning peak times. The exit adjacent to platform 4 will remain closed.

254 SOUTHERN AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is elective surgery to be cut in the hospitals serviced by the Southern Area Health Service?
(2) If this is the case, can he advise what cuts will occur in each of the hospitals in the Service’s area?
(3) If so, why will the cuts occur to elective surgery?

Answer—

(1) to (3) Elective surgery levels are the responsibility of hospital managers and Area Health Services. These levels are partly determined by seasonal demand.
The NSW Department of Health will soon be publishing elective surgery waiting lists on the Internet to assist general practitioners in helping patients with their options.


255 GUNDAGAI POLICE STATION—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Police—

(1) What are the current working shifts for police at the Gundagai Police Station?
(2) What will the shifts be for police at Gundagai Police Station for the:
(a) year 2000?
(b) period of the Olympic Games?
(c) year 2001?
(d) year 2002?
(3) How many officers will be on duty in each working shift?
(4) Will he ensure that night shifts will be maintained, both during the week and on weekends, now and in the future?

Answer—

(1) to (4) Shifts vary from time to time according to operational needs and in line with the Local Area Command Operational Policing Agreement.

256 GREATER MURRAY AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is elective surgery to be cut in the hospitals serviced by the Greater Murray Area Health Service?
(2) If this is the case, can he advise what cuts will occur in each of the hospitals in the Service’s area?
(3) If so, why will the cuts occur to elective surgery?

Answer—

(1) to (3) Elective surgery levels are the responsibility of hospital managers and Area Health Services. These levels are partly determined by seasonal demand.
The NSW Department of Health will soon be publishing elective surgery waiting lists on the Internet to assist general practitioners in helping patients with their options.

257 PARLIAMENT HOUSE PARKING—Mr Humpherson to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

(1) How many car spaces does his department have reserved in Parliament House?
(2) How much does this cost each year?
(3) For what purpose are these spaces reserved?
(4) Does the Hon John Johnson MLC reimburse his department for regular use of one of these spaces?
Answer—

(1) The Presiding Officers have allocated four car spaces at Parliament House for use by the Premier’s administration.
(2) The annual cost for the parking levy for four spaces is $1,600.
(3) Two spaces are allocated for the Premier’s ministerial vehicles. One space is allocated for a police vehicle. One space is allocated for Premier’s staff and departmental vehicles.
(4) I am advised the Hon J.R. Johnson MLC reimburses Parliament House personally for the parking levy for one car space at Parliament House.

258 OLYMPIC TICKET MEDIATION—Mr Humpherson to the Minister for the Olympics—

(1) At what rates of payment did he and SOCOG engage David Landa to mediate in the Olympic ticketing crisis?
(2) In engaging Mr Landa, did he consider the criticisms made by the ICAC that a $20,000 investigation Mr Landa undertook for the Minister for Fair Trading was flawed and lacked fairness?
Answer—

(1) and (2) David Landa was engaged by SOCOG as Independent Ticketing Mediator to review and resolve any customer complaints arising from the ticket refund process. It was a wise decision supported by the Minister for the Olympics. As is standard practice, the rates of payment in regard to the assignment are commercial-in-confidence.

259 SYDNEY OLYMPIC TENNIS CENTRE—Ms Moore to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the new Tennis NSW headquarters at the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre at Homebush Bay—
(1) When will Tennis NSW take possession of the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre and commence its 40-year lease on the site?
(2) What process did the Government undertake to identify Tennis NSW as the preferred lessee on the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre?
(3) What is the total cost of the construction of the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre?
(4) What contributions have Tennis NSW and Tennis Australia respectively made toward the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre?
(5) What income will the Government receive annually from the 40-year lease granted to Tennis NSW for the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre?
(6) What income is Tennis NSW expected to receive annually from the Sydney Olympic Tennis Centre during its 40-year lease?
(7) What is the estimated public subsidy being provided to Tennis NSW for the establishment of its new headquarters at Homebush Bay?
(8) What conditions have been imposed on Tennis NSW as prerequisites for the receipt of this public subsidy for a new headquarters and facilities for a private sporting association?

Answer—

(1) to (8) The arrangements with Tennis NSW have evolved over a considerable period of time culminating in the opening of the centre on 8 December 1999. Some of the information sought is commercial-in-confidence but the following information can be provided:
· Tennis NSW has taken over the facility on 8 December 1999. The arrangements provide for a 25-year lease with three 5-year option periods, expiring in 2039.
· In late 1994 and early 1995, the then Homebush Bay Development Corporation issued a “Call for Proposals for the development of the Olympic Tennis Centre”. The only response was submitted by a consortium, which was led by Tennis NSW. The proposal was not accepted on financial criteria. The process identified Tennis NSW as the body most likely to contribute financially and operationally to the centre’s development and they were accordingly awarded “preferred tenderer status”. Further negotiations at that stage were delayed because of changes to the Homebush Bay Masterplan which moved the location of the centre to where it is now.
· The final cost for the centre will be $38.8 million of which Tennis NSW and Tennis Australia will together contribute $7.1 million and SOCOG will contribute $1.3 million. These contributions were established initially by negotiation and latterly in recognition of particular enhancements required by the various parties. It should be recognised that tennis is one of very few sports that have contributed financially to a legacy venue.
· The NSW Government will not receive any annual rental income from the lease to Tennis NSW. However, Tennis NSW will take full operational and financial responsibility for the centre, apart from the Olympic Games period. This arrangement relieves the Government of any ongoing financial liability. Tennis NSW will make an annual payment to OCA by way of estate levy in return for management services (e.g., waste, traffic management, maintenance) in the Homebush Bay common domain.
· In response to the demands of the Olympic Games, certain undertakings relating to tennis were made in the Bid Documents. In satisfaction of these undertakings and by working in partnership with Tennis NSW, OCA has secured the establishment at Homebush Bay of an enhanced centre for the sport of tennis thus adding to the viability of the precinct. The capital contribution by the NSW Government is $30.4 million.
· Under the arrangements with OCA, Tennis NSW is required to:
- operate and maintain the centre at its cost for 40 years;
- pay estate levies to OCA;
- hold all major tennis tournaments at the Homebush venue unless the particular surface requirements of the event dictate otherwise;
- keep open a core area for public access; and
- make courts available to the public for hire.
Tennis NSW may additionally undertake further development in a designated expansion area, subject to OCA’s further approval.
Tennis NSW is not a private sporting association but rather a company limited by guarantee whose shareholders are the public tennis clubs around the State and the directors. It is a non-profit organisation which represents the interests of and promotes the sport. I understand that all earnings are applied to the furtherance of the sport of tennis.

260 FORESTRY STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—

(1) What arrangements have been made to process applications for workers assistance under the Forestry Structural Adjustment Committee?
(2) Has he received an application from the former sawmilling company A.S. Blatch and Sons at Mittagong?
(3) Why has no resolution been made on that application?
(4) Will he guarantee the application will be considered and resolved immediately?
(5) What is the explanation for the 1 year delay in resolving this matter?

Answer—

(1) Forest Industry Structural Adjustment Package (FISAP) Worker Assistance applications are currently being considered out of session by participating members of the Forestry Structural Adjustment Committee (FSAC) where appropriate. However, in cases where there are issues which require further discussion the FSAC may defer its decision.
While the Commonwealth’s suspension of participation in the FISAP has interrupted implementation of parts of the New South Wales FISAP, the NSW Government continues to honour its commitment to assist affected workers in the native timber industry during this period of restructuring.
(2) An application for business valuation under the FISAP Business Exit Assistance (BEA) program was received by the Forestry Structural Adjustment Unit (FSAU) from the company AS Blatch & Sons in November 1997. The application was progressed in accordance with standard procedures.
In March 1998 the company AS Blatch & Sons was invited to make a formal application for BEA. No formal application for BEA has been received from the company AS Blatch & Sons.
Applications for FISAP Worker Assistance may be made by individual displaced workers from the New South Wales native timber industry. There is no scope within the FISAP Worker Assistance guidelines for a company to make an application for assistance under the Worker Assistance program.
Individual applications for FISAP Worker Assistance from the partners of AS Blatch & Sons were received by the FSAU in late November 1998.
(3) Although having made an application for a business valuation under the FISAP and subsequently being invited to formally apply for BEA, the Company AS Blatch & Sons has not made a formal application for BEA.
In relation to individual Worker Assistance applications from each of the partners of AS Blatch & Sons, in February 1999, the FSAC agreed to defer each of these applications while further information on the applicants’ employment status was sought.
The FSAC has not met to consider FISAP Worker Assistance applications since this time primarily due to the Commonwealth’s suspension of participation in the New South Wales FISAP and subsequent discussion concerning possible resumption of participation in the program.
I am advised that these applications have not been considered by the FSAC out of session as it was felt that they required discussion at a formal meeting of the committee. I understand that affected applicants have been advised of this situation.
(4) I have asked the FSAU to review the FISAP Worker Assistance applications from each of the individual partners of AS Blatch & Sons and, subject to this review, be considered by the FSAC out of session.
If consensus cannot be reached by the FSAC in its consideration of these applications, the applications will be referred to me for consideration.
(5) Formal applications from each of the partners of AS Blatch & Sons for FISAP Worker Assistance were received by the FSAU on 23 November 1998.
The Worker Assistance Working Group and FSAC then considered these applications. Delays have been experienced as these applications were deferred by the FSAC subject to the provision of further information by the applicants. Subsequent to the receipt of additional information, these applications went back to the Worker Assistance Working Group for further consideration.
I am advised that these applications have not been considered out of session by the FSAC as it was felt that they required discussion at a formal meeting of the committee.

261 BULK WATER SUPPLY—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) (a) What levies are paid to Sydney Catchment Authority by Sydney Water or other agencies for bulk water supply?
(b) What is the projected annual revenue from such levies or income?
(2) What level of expenditure is planned by Sydney Catchment Authority on environmental remediation projects in the catchment?
(3) What projects are listed for such remediation work by Sydney Catchment Authority in 1999, 2000, and beyond?

Answer—

(1) (a) Sydney Water purchases water from the Sydney Catchment Authority (SCA) under a tariff arrangement comprising a fixed availability charge of $4.8 million per month and a volumetric charge of $104 per megalitre of bulk raw water supplied by the authority to Sydney Water.
(b) In 1999-2000, the SCA expects to receive approximately $116 million from Sydney Water from the sale of water. The authority has budgeted to receive a further $2 million from the sale of water and other services to other parties.
(2) The SCA is not the only agency that funds environmental remediation projects in the catchment area. Many other NSW Government agencies fund such projects. Local councils in the catchment area also have a key role in funding improvement works and developing improved pollution control strategies.
The SCA’s operating budget for managing and protecting the water supply catchment areas and enhancing the quality of bulk water is $27.3 million for this financial year. A further $9.2 million is budgeted for researching impacts on the catchment areas and educating local communities. Projects have been and will continue to be funded to improve soil erosion control and waste facilities, rehabilitate contaminated lands, control pests and weeds and rehabilitate mines. The SCA has also commenced a major $9 million project to upgrade the Upper Canal (which transports water from the southern water storage dams to Prospect Water Treatment Plant). As the honourable member would be aware, this is an open canal and pollutant infiltration was identified by Mr McClellan as a problem. The Government’s actions will help to resolve that problem.
The SCA and Sydney Water have spent $1.6 million rectifying the impact of the Wingecarribee Swamp failure. This major initiative will help to protect and improve water quality in the reservoir. A further $232,500 has been allocated this financial year for further remediation and associated work.
As part of its role in managing and protecting catchment infrastructure works, the SCA will also spend $36 million during 1999-2000 on constructing the new auxiliary spillway at Warragamba Dam.
The Government is also pursuing numerous other catchment improvement works and strategies, all of which respond positively to the Sydney Water Inquiry recommendations. These works and strategies will all result in water quality improvements.
(3) Refer to answer to question (2).

262 1994 QX VIRUS—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs representing the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—

(1) Will he confirm detail of the cause of the 1994 QX virus (a haplosporidan, otherwise known as marteilia sydneyi) outbreak in the Georges River?
(2) (a) Will he confirm if the Department of Fisheries, or any other body, conducted an investigation into the 1994 Georges River QX virus outbreak?
(b) What, if any, were the findings and recommendations of these investigations?
(3) (a) Will he detail how money raised from a research levy on oyster farmers is expended?
(b) What is the total amount of money raised from the imposition of this levy?
(c) What, if any, amount has been allocated in this financial year to research and/or remedial works in relation to the Georges River oyster industry?
(d) What amount was allocated, and what amount was expended, in the last 5 individual financial years for this purpose?

Answer—

(1) I am advised the causative infectious agent of QX disease is the minute protozoan parasite Marteilia sydneyi. The parasite is not a risk to humans. Although significant research has been carried out, the infective stage of M.sydneyi have not yet been found but it is suspected that an intermediate host (possibly a polychaete worm) is involved.
(2) (a) An investigation into the outbreak was conducted by scientists from the University of Queensland (who had the most experience with this disease). Scientists from my department, NSW Fisheries, assisted.
(b) The major conclusions of the report of the investigation include:
· QX was not present in the Hawkesbury River or Port Stephens, other major oyster growing estuaries nearby, where Georges River oysters had been regularly shipped.
· The report identified a very narrow period of time when oysters were infected from about the end of January to the beginning of March. The report made recommendations regarding the movement of oysters within the Georges River to reduce the impact of disease on local oyster farming practices.
· Suspicions that a polychaete worm is an intermediate host were raised, although this has not been confirmed.
(3) (a) Expenditure of these funds are overseen by the Oyster Research Advisory Committee (ORAC) made up of industry members with an independent chair.
Some funds go to maintaining ORAC and small research projects. Most funds are used as an industry contribution to the Fisheries Research Development Corporation (FRDC). Industry funds are matched at about 3:1 from the Commonwealth Government and the FRDC allocates funds for research. Funds collected on behalf of the oyster industry by my department, NSW Fisheries, are remitted annually to FRDC.
(b) In the 1998-99 financial year, the total amount collected was approximately $81,000.
(c) No amount has been allocated this year. However, I am advised my department proposes to conduct a sampling survey next year. The funding for the project is yet to be confirmed.
(d) I am advised the following projects have been funded in the last 5 financial years:
· QX survey in key estuaries in late March and early April 1999
My department conducted a QX survey in key estuaries. Funding was approximately $10,000.
· Removal of oyster cultivation materials from QX affected oyster leases upstream of the Captain Cook Bridge, Georges River
Conducted by my department in co-operation with the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training as part of the New Work Opportunities Program. These rehabilitated areas were returned to public use. The cost was approximately $700,000, shared by the Commonwealth, State and local government, and the local oyster farmers.
The following funding for items is enhanced funding through the 3:1 ratio on the research levy and/or associated grants:
· Breeding program to select for faster growing oysters (in Port Stephens) and oyster resistance to QX and winter mortality in Georges River
My department’s fisheries scientists have been conducting this program since 1996. This research will cost in excess of $650,000 over 4 years and end by December 2000 (more than $160,000 will be spent in 1999).
· Identification of environmental factors, with particular reference to acid sulphate soil runoff, causing production losses in Sydney rock oysters
Research Organisation = University of NSW
Total Budget = $372,600
End in December 1999
· Control of winter mortality and QX disease on Sydney rock oysters
Research Organisation = University of Queensland
Total Budget = $416,500
Ended in June 1996
· QX disease of the Sydney rock oyster on the Central Coast of New South Wales
Research Organisation = University of Queensland
Total Budget = $161,400
Ended in June 1996
264 BUDGET CUTS—MANNING BASE HOSPITAL—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) Has a direction been given that the Mid North Coast Area Health Service cut back on its budget for the year 1999-2000?
(2) Will such cutback include the Manning Base Hospital being required to cut back expenditure in the sum of $1.1 million?
(3) If not, what was the sum of the cutback for Manning Base Hospital?
(4) Why was the cutback ordered?
(5) If it was ordered because of previous overruns of the budget, in what areas did those overruns occur?
(6) What was the amount of such overruns in the years:
(a) 1995-96?
(b) 1996-97?
(c) 1997-98?
(d) 1998-99?
(e) to date?
(7) Who was responsible for those overruns?
(8) Were the overruns sanctioned by the Board of the Mid North Coast Area Health Service?
(9) If so, when?

Answer—

(1) No.
(2) to (5) Manning Base Hospital is required to operate within its budget allocation.
(6) Financial performance is reported in the Area’s annual reports.
(7) to (9) Under the Health Services Act 1997, the Board of Directors is responsible for the control of the Area Health Service.

265 ELECTRONIC TOLLING SYSTEM—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) What is the current position in relation to the installation of electronic tolling measures on the:
(a) Harbour Bridge?
(b) M2 Motorway?
(c) Eastern Distributor?
(2) Will the electronic tolling system for the:
(a) Harbour Bridge;
(b) M2 Motorway;
(c) Eastern Distributor;
be compatible with each other so that cars will not need three different transponders in their cars in order to use the electronic tolling system?
(3) When is it expected that the electronic tolling system be introduced for the:
(a) Harbour Bridge?
(b) M2 Motorway?
(c) Eastern Distributor?
(4) What form will the electronic tolling system take and how will it work?

Answer—

(1) (a) A contract is being negotiated with Abigroup/Q-Free for the supply of an electronic tolling (ETC) system for the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Tunnel. The system to be installed is designed to the latest European Standard, which has been adopted by all governments of Australia for new tolling installations. The system is expected to be operational towards the latter part of next year.
(b) The M2 Motorway has an ETC system that is to an American Standard. In time, the operator of the M2 is expected to replace this system with one based on the European Standard.
(c) Airport Motorway Ltd has awarded a contract for an ETC system that will be compatible with the system for the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Tunnel. This system is expected to be available to motorists towards the latter part of next year.
(2) The operator of the M2, Hills Motorway, chose an ETC system for the M2 some time ago. This system is not compatible with the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Tunnel. I would point out that the contract for the M2 was formulated and signed by the previous Coalition Government. Under the Motorway Deeds negotiated by that Government, the choice of tolling system was a matter for the individual operators of privately funded roads.
However, this Government has established a process that will promote future compatibility and interoperability between tolling operators. In this respect, the Government has stipulated that any ETC system on the Eastern Distributor must be to the standard adopted by the Roads and Traffic Authority and compatible with the standard agreed between all Australian States.
In time, all motorways will have compatible ETC systems, such that only one tag will need to be fitted to a vehicle for all toll roads.
(3) (a) See (1) (a) above.
(b) See (1) (b) above.
(c) See (1) (c) above.
(4) A driver would open an account with the toll road operator and receive a tag (small transponder). The tag is attached to the windscreen of the vehicle. As the vehicle enters the toll area, the tag is read and the toll deducted from the account. The tag will make a beeping noise to advise the driver of the successful transaction. The driver’s account may be “topped up” as the balance decreases.
Initially, ETC will take place at tollbooths. As the number of customers increases, dedicated lanes will be made available for ETC. Eventually, free-flow tolling will be available and projects, such as the Cross-City Tunnel, will be built without tollbooths.
Legislation recently passed will assist in the transition from cash tolling to ETC, through to free-flow tolling.

266 BICYCLE SAFETY CAMPAIGN—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) (a) How much funding per annum will be provided to bicycle safety and responsible road user campaigns?
(b) Where will this funding come from?
(2) Will these campaigns be different in country New South Wales from those in city locations?
(3) If yes, in what way?

Answer—

(1) (a) and (b) For the 1999-2000 financial year, the approved funding for overall general statewide road safety campaigns conducted by the RTA is $12,015,000. The road safety issues addressed by campaigns include:
· Speed Management.
· Drink Driving.
· Driver Fatigue.
· School Safety.
· Occupant Restraints.
· Rural Road Safety.
· Pedestrian Safety.
The overall Road Safety Education budget for schools is approximately $2.9 million per annum. Bicycle education is part of an overall road safety education program provided to students as part of a compulsory, curriculum-based, Personal Development/Health/Physical Education syllabus. This curriculum is delivered to students from kindergarten to year 10.
For the 1999-2000 financial year, $500,000 has been allocated for “Sharing the Road” campaigns and $60,000 per annum was allocated to promote safe cycling during Bike Week.
Community and Road Education Scheme (CARES) facilities also provide bicycle education to children at a number of venues around the State. These facilities are jointly supported by the RTA, the NSW Police Service and local councils with sponsorship gained from organisations such as the Motor Accident Authority.
The Road Safety Education Program for schools and Statewide Road Safety campaigns are funded by the State Government.
(2) No. The program delivery for road safety education including bicycle education is identical in country and metropolitan areas.
(3) Bike Week and the Sharing the Road campaigns are the same statewide.

267 REGIONAL GROWTH CENTRE—QUEANBEYAN—Mr Webb to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs—

(1) Is he aware of the plight of small businesses and landlords in Monaro Street in Queanbeyan?
(2) What is the progress of the Government’s commitment to make Queanbeyan the State’s next regional growth centre?
(3) Does he support the Queanbeyan City Council and the Queanbeyan Business Enterprise Centre in their projects to enliven the CBD of Queanbeyan and the importance of the RTA’s review into the ring road and the potential and importance of Queanbeyan to this state?

Answer—

(1) to (3) The current level of shop vacancies in Monaro Street has largely come about from past decisions on development issues and changing lifestyles and shopping patterns of the people of Queanbeyan.
In March 1999, the Premier announced that Queanbeyan will be included in the Country Centres Growth Strategy through the Department of State and Regional Development.
Since then, both my office and the department have met on several occasions with key industry leaders, local government and community representatives to discuss the development of a strategy and how the Government can assist.
It is currently proposed that a business audit of both Queanbeyan and Yarrowlumla Local Government Areas be conducted and a Marketing Plan developed. Many of the vacant shops in Monaro Street are somewhat old in appearance and a strategy to encourage landlords to renovate or redevelop would be a practical project to pursue further. Both my office and the Department are currently developing these ideas with key industry leaders, local government and community representatives.
I have been pleased to see the strong support of Queanbeyan City Council, the Queanbeyan Business Enterprise Centre and Yarrowlumla Shire in working with the Government to develop strategies for growth and the revitalisation of Monaro Street and the rest of the Queanbeyan central business district. I certainly support these organisations plus Yarrowlumla Shire and other local business and community leaders who have given input.
The reviewing of proposals for an alternative ring road for heavy road transport around Queanbeyan and the feasibility of the project is a matter for consideration by my colleague, the Minister for Transport.
16 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 22)

268 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Bland;
Lachlan;
Forbes;
Temora;
Young;
Junee;
Cootamundra;
Weddin—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.
269 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Brogden to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many tickets were allocated to applicants in the first round of Olympic tickets in the:
(a) Pittwater local government area?
(b) Warringah local government area?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

270 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mrs Chikarovski to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the postcodes of:
2066;
2067;
2065;
2111;
2110;
2112;
2064—
How many people residing in each of the above postcode areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

271 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Collins to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government area of Willoughby (postcode 2068)?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.


272 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Collins to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government area of Willoughby, how many residents:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

273 UNATTACHED OFFICERS—Mr Debnam to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

How many, by department, agency and salary level, Senior Executive Service and Chief Executive Service officers were classified as “unattached officers” on:
(a) 16 November 1999?
(b) 1 July 1999?
(c) 1 July 1998?
(d) 1 July 1997?
(e) 1 July 1996?
(f) 1 July 1995?

Answer—

This Government has succeeded in reducing the Senior Executive Service (SES) in New South Wales by some 457 positions since March 1995, and has thereby made significant savings for the taxpayers of New South Wales.
The maximum initial period that Chief or Senior Executive Service Officers may remain designated as “unattached” is 4 weeks.

274 PROVISION FOR BAD AND DOUBTFUL DEBTS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

(1) What provision for bad and doubtful debts has been made for each department and agency in the New South Wales Total Public Sector in the:
(a) 1998-99 Budget?
(b) Revised Estimates for 1998-99?
(c) 1999-2000 Budget?
(d) Forward Estimates to 2002-03 by year?
(2) What debts have been written off by each department and agency in the New South Wales Total Public Sector in the Final Results for:
(a) 1998-99?
(b) 1997-98?
(c) 1996-97?


Answer—

(1) The following appendix provides the detailed bad and doubtful debts provisions for each department and agency in the New South Wales Total Public Sector. The following notes should be read in conjunction with the appendix:

Note (1)
The total State provision for bad and doubtful debts in the 1998-99 and 1999-2000 Budgets are consistent with prior years as disclosed in the table below. Further, bad and doubtful debtors expenses are significantly lower than the provision, reflecting the conservative nature of debtors provisions in the State accounts.

	Provision for Bad and Doubtful Debtors $ million	Bad and Doubtful Debtors Expenses $ million
1994-95	129	94
1995-96	318	153
1996-97	234	19
1997-98	263	86
1998-99	279 (Note 2)	85
1999-2000 (budget estimtate)	226	N/A

Note (2)
In prior years, up to and including 1997-98, revenue from certain State taxes was offset against the bad and doubtful debts provision for the Consolidated Fund entity. In 1998-99, the debtor and the doubtful debts provision were disclosed separately and grossed up. This increased the provision by $236 million to $515 million as disclosed in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The earlier treatment is still applied in the 1999-2000 Budget and forward years.

Note (3)
The provision for bad and doubtful debts in 1993-94 represented 7 per cent of the debtors balance at that time. Similarly, the provision in 1998-99 represents 8 per cent of the debtors balance for the same year.

Note (4)
(a) Fair Trading Administration Corporation (FTAC) is a Public Financial Enterprise (PFE). While PFEs are consolidated in the Total Public Sector results, no data is collected in relation to budgets. The provision for FTAC at June 1999 ($56.6 million) represented an increase of $6.5 million on the previous year.
(b) The provision for the Attorney General’s Department increased by $15.1 million during 1998-99. This increase is primarily related to the Victims’ Compensation Fund.
Note (5)
There is no information available for PTEs in years 2000-01 to 2002-03 as this data is not collected.



PROVISION FOR BAD AND DOUBTFUL DEBTS

Agency Name1998-99 Budget $’0001998-99 Revenue Estimates $’000 1999-2000 $’000 2000-01 $’000 2001-02 $’000 2002-03 $’000

Art Gallery of New South Wales151515151515

Attorney General’s Department116,102135,233145,026147,219147,219147,219

Australian Museum090000

Crown Transactions Entity110592150155155155

Department of Aboriginal Affairs00255255255255

Department of Agriculture249183332375375375

Department of Community Services300324253253253253

Department of Corrective Services122218243243243243

Department of Education and Training770886765765765765

Department of Fair Trading613930850850850850

Department of Health16,55016,47519,26119,26119,26119,261

Department of Information Technology and Management18131110100100100

Department of Land and Water Conservation7141,3821,5201,5201,5201,520

Department of Mineral Resources750000

Department of Rural Fire Service0200000

Department of State and Regional Development3,8633,4773,8813,8813,8813,881

Ethnic Affairs Commission454343434343

Health Care Complaints Commission160159150140100110

Home Care Service of New South Wales1,4001,5381,0941,0941,0941,094

Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales2,8571,8802,0602,0602,0602,060

Ministry of Energy and Utilities250250250250250250

Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences222222

National Parks and Wildlife Service165440165165165165

New South Wales Crime Commission0590000

New South Wales Fire Brigades138211140145150160

New South Wales Fisheries2250000

New South Wales Police Service80233183207231255

Office of State Revenue Taxes13,57710,8609,4179,4179,4179,417

Office of the Board of Studies322222

Olympic Co-ordination Authority0510000

Premier’s Department6138057575757

Roads and Traffic Authority1,3351,5131,5151,6651,6651,665

Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust6245666

State Revenues— Consolidated Fund Entity (Note 2)0236,478*0000

The Legislature033333

Waterways Authority25835353535

Aboriginal Housing Office0263125150150150

Audit Office of New South Wales151515151515

Department of Public Works and Services9741,841824855883911

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (incorporating756350505050

Greyhound Racing Authority9115555

Harness Racing New South Wales799999

Home Purchase Assistance Authority3,3702,9963,7873,7873,7873,787

Mine Subsidence Board096100100100100

Mines Rescue Board11637050505050

New South Wales Adult Migrant English Service0251111

New South Wales Cancer Council5355555

New South Wales Insurance Ministerial Corporation1,4181,5181,4181,4181,4181,418

New South Wales Meat Industry Authority0180000

New South Wales Meat Industry Authority201819191919

Public Trust Office—Administration001,6471,6471,6471,647

Safe Food Production New South Wales921460000

State Sports Centre Trust102510101010

State Valuation Office01845454545

Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority186245180180180180

WorkCover Authority3361,7921,0861,0861,0861,086

Advance Energy05320

Australian Inland Energy0136110

Broken Hill Water Board749851713

Department of Housing—Land and Housing Corporation16,00013,26413,500

Freight Rail Corporation05700

Great Southern Energy1,5001,2211,088

Hunter Water Corporation150151150

Integral Energy05,5572,300

Newcastle Port Corporation03240

NorthPower2,0001,4101,460

Pacific Power0500

Port Kembla Port Corporation212421

Rail Access Corporation700125167

Rail Services Australia02,6865,716

State Forests of New South Wales113460127

State Rail Authority01,4702,000

State Transit Authority180120100

Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games08640

Sydney Ports Corporation01810

Sydney Water Corporation01,4140

Teacher Housing Authority504560

TransGrid0180

Waste Service of New South Wales7501,2001,200

Wollongong Sports Ground Trust101010

Zoological Parks Board02525

EnergyAustralia03,7980

Fair Trading Administration Corporation56,637

Total—Note 2188,395576,394*225,945199,615199,632199,704

*Note 2: In prior years, up to and including 1997-98, revenue from certain State taxes was offset against the bad and doubtful debts provison for the Consolidated Fund entity. In 1998-99, the debtor and the doubtful debts provision were disclosed separately and grossed up. This increased the provision by $236 million to $515 million as disclosed in the Consolidated financial Statements. The earlier treatment is still applied in the 1999-2000 Budget and forward years.
(2) The Auditor-General provides details of debts written-off in Volume 3 of his report which is tabled in Parliament in December each year. Therefore:
(a) Debts written-off in 1998-99 appear in Volume 3 of the Auditor-General’s 1999 Report to Parliament.
(b) Debts written-off in 1997-98 appear in Volume 3 of the Auditor-General’s 1998 Report to Parliament.
(c) Debts written-off in 1996-97 appear in Volume 3 of the Auditor-General’s 1997 Report to Parliament.

275 DIVIDENDS AND TAX EQUIVALENTS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

What were the dividends and what were the tax equivalents for each public trading enterprise in the:
(a) 1998-99 Budget?
(b) Revised Estimates for 1998-99?
(c) Final Results for 1998-99?
(d) 1999-2000 Budget?
(e) Forward Estimates to 2002-03 by year?

Answer—

(a) to (e) The requested information is publicly available, summarised by industry groups, in the 1999-2000 Budget Paper No 2. The 1998-99 actuals for individual agencies are available in their annual reports.
It is not possible to release individual agency details for the 4 forward years because this is commercially sensitive information. A number of New South Wales agencies are now competing for business both within and outside New South Wales and it would seriously disadvantage them in the market if this information were to be released.
It is noted that in previous years, Budget Papers did publish agency details but covered only the budget year.

276 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Fraser to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Coffs Harbour;
Bellingen;
Ulmarra;
Nymboida;
McLean;
Grafton;
Copmanhurst—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.
277 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr George to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people have been successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round in the local government areas of:
(a) Lismore?
(b) Casino?
(c) Kyogle?
(d) Byron?
(e) Tenterfield?
(f) Richmond River?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

278 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr George to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Casino;
Lismore;
Richmond River Shire;
Kyogle;
Tenterfield;
Byron—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

279 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Glachan to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Albury City?
(b) Culcairn Shire?
(c) Hume Shire?
(d) Corowa Shire?
Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

280 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Glachan to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Albury City;
Hume Shire;
Culcairn Shire;
Corowa Shire—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?
Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

281 EPA SYDNEY REGION—Ms Harrison to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

How many jobs are relocated to Parramatta with the moving of the Sydney region office of the NSW Environment Protection Authority to Parramatta?

Answer—

A total of 56 positions were moved to Parramatta as a result of the relocation of the Environment Protection Authority’s Sydney Region office to Parramatta.

282 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Hartcher to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Gosford;
Wyong;
Lake Macquarie;
Newcastle;
Port Stephens—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?
Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

283 DISTRICT COURTS—Mr Hartcher to the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

(1) Are there up to ten vacancies in the office of the Chamber Magistrate, Downing Centre Local Court?
(2) Have these vacancies remained unfilled for 2 years?
(3) If so, why has the Attorney General’s Department failed to staff these vacancies?
(4) Were new maps showing the court districts of New South Wales delivered to the offices of the Downing Centre Local Court in May 1999?
(5) Were these maps the first since 1962 to be produced for use by district courts (showing accurate jurisdictional boundaries)?
(6) Were the maps delivered large, glossy in colour and presented in a polished timber frame, and did they fail to show the boundaries of these court districts?
(7) What was the total cost of the production of these maps?
(8) Have these maps been replaced by ones showing jurisdictional boundaries?
(9) What is the total/estimated cost for replacement of the maps issued in May 1999?

Answer—

(1) to (3) There is no “Office of the Chamber Magistrate” as such at the Downing Centre Local Court.
The position of Chamber Magistrate exists at all full-time Local Courts and their role is to provide information and assistance to members of the public about court processes and procedures and the options available to assist anyone who has a legal problem.
There are two full-time Chamber Magistrate positions located at the Downing Centre. The legally qualified officers who hold these positions report to the Registry Managers of the Local Court Criminal Registry and the Local Court Civil Registry at the Downing Centre. The Chamber position in the Criminal Registry is currently vacant but the position is being filled by relief staff until permanent recruitment action is completed.
(4) Framed and laminated maps were delivered to the Downing Centre for distribution to all Local Courts around May 1999. This was part of an order of maps showing updated court locations which were supplied for the whole Attorney General’s Department. No districts were displayed on this new map.
(5) Maps were produced and distributed in 1964, 1971 and 1999. The maps produced in 1964 included boundaries of police districts, licensing districts, petty sessions and district court districts and were annotated with details showing the sitting locations of the various jurisdictions.
The maps produced in 1971 included boundaries of petty sessions districts (now local courts districts). As previously indicated, the current maps do not show district boundaries.
(6) These maps were produced as a locality map for the information of the public, court staff, judicial officers and other departmental officers to assist in planning, transport and co-ordination of resources at courts across New South Wales.
In early planning it was identified that boundary information was of little importance to the potential users of the revised map.
For example, there are no District Court boundaries as the court has jurisdiction to sit anywhere in New South Wales and defining Local Courts Districts is necessary only in a small proportion of civil claims matters which come before the local courts, principally in determining the appropriate venue under the Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act 1970.
The 1971 map was used as a guide for determining jurisdictional boundaries, but locations adjacent to boundaries could only be accurately determined by reference to county and parish maps in conjunction with the order made under the Justices Act 1902.
The primary reference for this was the New South Wales Government Gazette (No 135 of Thursday, 25 November 1971, pp 4519-4530).
The new maps (at 900 x 1,200 mm as opposed to 1,200 x 1,400 mm) are slightly smaller than the previously issued maps. They are laminated and framed for ease of maintenance and materials were selected which will wear well with regular use.
Given that they are used as a reference tool, the maps were designed to ensure that the problem affecting unfinished materials—discolouring and fabric break down from direct contact and environmental pollutants—was reduced or eliminated. They can be used with whiteboard markers and any marks can easily be wiped clean.
The old maps were a paper finish on a calico backing with a timber plate at the top and bottom for rolling or hanging. The majority of these had discoloured and the paper had deteriorated and become unsightly.
The framing and finish of the map was specifically designed to ensure the maps would be an attractive addition to a Court Registry.
(7) The total cost was $25,000 for 218 maps.
(8) No, the 1999 issue maps have not been replaced with new maps showing boundaries and there is no proposal to issue new maps in the foreseeable future.
(9) Nil as no replacement maps have been ordered and no further costs have been incurred.

284 CASINO SURVEILLANCE DIVISION—Mr Hartcher to the Minister for Gaming and Racing and Minister Assisting the Premier on Hunter Development—

(1) Was a Mr John St Vincent Welch investigated by the Casino Surveillance Division of the Department of Gaming and Racing from December 1995 to April 1996 as a result of an Internal Audit Report from Sydney Harbour Casino being referred to the Casino Control Authority?
(2) Did Mr St Vincent Welch surrender his provisional “special employee” licence in accordance with the provisions of the Casino Control Act 1992 on the termination of his contract of employment?
(3) Has Mr St Vincent Welch been refused access to the report into the investigation conducted by the Casino Surveillance Division from the Casino Control Authority?
(4) Have requests for access to the report made on behalf of Mr St Vincent Welch by the Media Entertainment and Art Alliance and Brock Partners, Solicitors, been refused?
(5) Is the Casino Surveillance Division currently conducting investigations into the conduct of at least two members of the Star City Board?
(6) Has the Casino Surveillance Division’s investigation into at least two members of the Star City Board been ongoing for more than 12 months?
(7) Has Mr Ron Harrax, the Director of the Casino Surveillance Division, been requested on at least three occasions, twice in writing, by the Casino Control Authority to expedite the completion of the investigation referred to above?
(8) Will he instruct the Director of the Casino Surveillance Division to complete the investigation and report without further delay?
Answer—

(1) The Casino Surveillance Division was conducting an investigation into Mr St Vincent Welch’s application for a casino employee’s licence, as required by section 50 of the Casino Control Act.
(2) Yes.
(3) Yes.
(4) Yes.
(5) I am not aware of the investigation.
(6) See (5)
(7) I am advised that information concerning the Casino Surveillance Division’s investigations into casino operations is guarded by the secrecy provisions in section 148 of the Casino Control Act and is confidential.
(8) Yes.

285 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first round Olympic ticket sale in the local government areas of:
(a) Warringah?
(b) Manly?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.
286 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people residing in the local government areas of Warringah and Manly:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

287 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for the Olympics—

Of those who applied, what percentage of people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Goulburn?
(b) Mulwaree?
(c) Tumut?
(d) Gunning?
(e) Crookwell?
(f) Boorowa?
(g) Yass?
(h) Gundagai?
(i) Harden?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

288 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Mulwaree;
Goulburn;
Crookwell;
Boorowa;
Gunning;
Gundagai;
Yass;
Tumut;
Harden—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event as a result of joining the Olympic Club?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?


Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

289 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Humpherson to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Ku-ring-gai?
(b) Warringah?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

290 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Humpherson to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the postcode areas of:
2085;
2086;
2087;
2075;
2076;
2077;
2078;
2079—
How many people residing in each of the above postcode areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

291 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Dr Kernohan to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Camden?
(b) Campbelltown?
(c) Penrith?
(d) Liverpool?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

292 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Dr Kernohan to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Camden;
Campbelltown;
Penrith;
Liverpool;
Wollondilly—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event in the official draw?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?
Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

293 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Maguire to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Tumbarumba?
(b) Holbrook?
(c) Wagga Wagga?
(d) Lockhart?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

294 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Maguire to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Lockhart;
Tumbarumba;
Holbrook;
Wagga Wagga—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

295 ROAD TUNNEL VENTILATION SHAFTS—Ms Moore to the Minister for Health—

Given the construction of road tunnel ventilation shafts and the failure of the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning and the Roads and Transport Authority to implement alternative cheaper air treatment technology—
(1) What research has been undertaken by the Health Department into alternative air treatment technologies for road tunnels?
(2) What conclusions were drawn about alternative air treatment technologies as a result of this research?
(3) Will he ensure that the Department of Health pro-actively undertakes a rigorous health assessment of the available technologies in relation to all road tunnel proposals, including the Cross City Tunnel and M5 East?
(4) Will the Government provide additional funding for hospitals to accommodate the increased admissions that will result from the failure to implement available technologies to improve regional air quality across Sydney, particularly in inner city areas?

Answer—

(1) and (2) None. However, I am advised that the RTA has carried out an extensive examination at world’s best practice for air treatment in road tunnels.
(3) Research on alternative air treatment technologies is beyond the technical expertise of the Department of Health, as it requires specialist engineering and air science expertise.
(4) The NSW Government’s Air Quality Management Plan Action for Air is designed to improve air quality across Sydney, providing a net health benefit.

296 M5 EAST AND CROSS CITY TUNNELS—Ms Moore to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

Concerning the proposed construction of ventilation stacks for the M5 East and the Cross City Tunnels:
(1) Is the Government aware that there are alternative, cheaper air treatment technologies available?
(2) What research has been undertaken by the Government’s contractors, consultants or the RTA into alternative air treatment technologies for road tunnels?
(3) Why do the RTA and its consultants continue to refuse to implement effective alternative technologies?
(4) Why does the RTA continue to publicise outdated, incorrect and misleading advice about emission treatment technologies?
(5) Why is the Government relying on outdated and incorrect information provided by the RTA and its consultants?
(6) What action will he take to redress the situation and ensure the availability of up-to-date research on alternative treatment technologies and the construction of new road tunnels using this technology?


Answer—

(1) to (6) The Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) has continued to review the latest technology available for tunnels worldwide.
Under Condition 79 of the Conditions of Approval stipulated by the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, the RTA is required to continuously assess international developments in dealing with air emissions from road tunnels.
A report prepared by Evens and Peck Management concluded that:
(a) There are no new tunnel emission treatment technologies since the date of project approval.
(b) There is no known permanent installation of a system to remove gases for external air quality purposes.
(c) Apart from Norway and Japan, there is no widespread use of systems for internal air quality treatment, although systems and concepts continue to be developed and tested.
(d) In view of the continuous improvement in vehicle emissions over a number of years, it is unlikely that the use of tunnel emission cleaning systems will become widespread.
A senior RTA officer also visited Norway and Germany in June this year to inspect tunnel-cleaning systems.
It is accepted practice worldwide that if the use of mechanical ventilation systems results in air quality goals being achieved, then air treatment systems are not used.
While in traditional tunnel countries such as Switzerland, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, England, Sweden, Belgium and Austria there are a number of trial plants for gases, no electrostatic precipitators or gas treatment systems are being implemented in any tunnel at this time.
The contract for the M5 East is a design and construct contract. The design must meet the Conditions of Approval for this project, but the project scope allows for innovation.
The three tenders included joint venture partners from Japan and Germany. Tunnel consultants from Japan, Germany, USA and Holland were involved in the preparation of the tenders. All of these international consultants are experienced in the design and management of tunnels.
Each tenderer proposed a different ventilation system. None of the tenderers proposed a system which included electrostatic precipitators or gas cleaning systems.
The RTA is continuing to review international developments in tunnel-treatment systems.

297 M5 EAST VENTILATION TUNNEL AND EXHAUST STACK—Ms Moore to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

Concerning Government contracts for work on the design and construction of the M5 East ventilation tunnel and exhaust stack—
(1) How many contracts have been signed?
(2) Who are the parties to the contracts?
(3) What work is to be undertaken as a result of the contracts?
(4) What are the terms and conditions for the work to be undertaken?
(5) What elements of this contracted work have already been approved for commencement?
(6) What is the nature of compensation owing to the project’s contractors if the ventilation tunnel and stack is not built and alternative ventilation technology is used instead?

Answer—

(1) and (2) One contract has been signed. The Roads and Traffic Authority and Baulderstone Hornibrook Bilfinger + Berger Joint Venture.
(3) The design and construction of the M5 East Freeway.
(4) The design of the ventilation system and exhaust stack must meet the project’s Conditions of Approval 70 to 81 stipulated by the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning.
(5) Approval has been given for construction of the 4 km long tunnels and for the access shaft from the ventilation fan house, at Turrella, to the tunnel connecting the fan house to the mainline tunnels.
(6) The cost to the Roads and Traffic Authority to suspend the project works, including re-establishment, is estimated at $20 million with ongoing cost of $14 million per month for the first 2 months and $11 million for subsequent months. Should the project be stopped, it will cost the community at least $48 million for a 2-month delay, with increasing costs for longer delays.

298 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Oakeshott to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Hastings Valley;
Manning Valley—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

299 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr O’Doherty to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government area of Hornsby, how many people:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

300 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr O’Farrell to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the postcodes:
2069;
2070;
2071;
2072;
2073;
2074;
2075;
2076—
How many people residing in each of the above postcode areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

301 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr O’Farrell to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many Olympic tickets have been allocated in the first round of ticketing to people living within either:
(a) Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council; or
(b) postcodes:
(i) 2069;
(ii) 2070;
(iii) 2071;
(iv) 2072;
(v) 2073;
(vi) 2074;
(vii) 2075;
(viii) 2076?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

302 STLD POSITIONS—Mr O’Farrell to the Minister for Education and Training—
(1) What are the proposed changes to the allocation of STLD positions at government schools in the Ku-ring-gai electorate?
(2) On what criterion were these allocations made?

Answer—

(1) and (2) At the suggestion of both the Secondary Principals’ Council and the Primary Principals’ Association, STLD positions are being allocated according to need. The allocation takes into account the results of Basic Skills Tests and the English Language and Literacy Assessment.

303 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr D.L. Page to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Ballina;
Byron;
Tweed;
Richmond River—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.
304 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Griffith?
(b) Murrumbidgee?
(c) Carrathool?
(d) Leeton?
(e) Narrandera?
(f) Conargo?
(g) Jerilderie?
(h) Deniliquin?
(i) Murray?
(j) Berrigan?
(k) Urana?
(l) Rand?
(m) Windourin?
(n) Hay?
(o) Balranald?
(p) Wakool?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

305 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Griffith;
Carrathool;
Leeton;
Narrandera;
Murrumbidgee;
Jerilderie;
Conargo;
Murray;
Berrigan;
Urana;
Rand;
Deniliquin;
Hay;
Balranald—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

306 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Richardson to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government area of Baulkham Hills?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.
307 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Richardson to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the postcodes:
2154;
2155;
2156;
2125;
2126;
2158;
2153—
How many people residing in each of the above postcode areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

308 NATIVE TITLE CLAIMS—SPORTING AND COMMUNITY ORGANISATIONS—Mr Richardson to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) Is he aware of the difficulties posed by a Native Title claim on Charlestown Golf Club’s course?
(2) How many similar claims have been made on Crown land under the care and control of local councils and used by sporting and community organisations?
(3) What are the names of the affected organisations?
(4) Why have these sporting and community groups been allowed to operate on Crown land without the security of a lease?
(5) What assistance has the Department of Land and Water Conservation given to affected sporting and community groups?

Answer—

(1) Charlestown Golf Club is situated on Crown land reserved for public recreation. Lake Macquarie City Council is the manager of the Reserve Trust for the land. The land is not currently subject to a native title determination application although it may have been affected by application NC 98/8 between 31 March 1998 to 6 August 1998.
Land status investigations undertaken by the Department of Land and Water Conservation indicated that there had been no act by the Crown in respect to most of the subject land which would have extinguished any native title in the land. As a result, in order to be certain that any title the Reserve Trust may grant to the club is valid, the Reserve Trust must comply with the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993 (C’th).
Lake Macquarie City Council, as manager of the Reserve Trust, has through its solicitor lodged a non-claimant application with the Federal Court which is one way of ensuring a valid title can be granted. However, recent investigations indicate that another approach may be more satisfactory and cost-effective. Accordingly, the Department will be in contact with the council to canvas the other option.
(2) There are currently 120 native title determination applications affecting land in New South Wales. Many of these applications affect Crown land under the control of councils and used by community and sporting groups.
(3) Until land status investigations are complete, I am unable to say how many sites are affected or the identity of the organisations concerned.
(4) It is the Government’s policy that the occupation of Crown reserves under the control of councils should be authorised under a lease or licence and this is the position in most cases. However, there are undoubtedly some informal arrangements in existence. In the case of Charlestown Golf Course it would seem that the club and the council have been attempting to negotiate a lease acceptable to both parties for many years.
(5) The Department of Land and Water Conservation provides advice and guidance to Reserve Trusts, the managers of Reserve Trusts and the users of reserved land on native title issues in the context of providing general advice on the management of these lands.

309 STLD RESOURCES—Mr Rozzoli to the Minister for Education and Training—

(1) (a) Does current research on Reading Recovery programs indicate grave concerns relating to the effectiveness and cost efficiency of the programs in improving literacy standards?
(b) If yes, why is the Government continuing to fund these programs to the detriment of more beneficial and cost effective programs such as those available through the use of Support Learning Difficulty Teachers?
(2) (a) Have Support Learning Difficulty Teacher resources remained static for the last 5 years?
(b) If yes, why?
(3) Why are current levels of STLD resources in many high schools being reduced?
(4) Will the Government now increase funding to expand these resources to cater for the ever increasing number of students with learning difficulties?

Answer—

(1) (a) No.
(b) Not applicable.
(2) (a) No, there has been an increase of 255 STLD positions and an additional 40 positions as district learning difficulties co-ordinators since 1995.
(b) Not applicable.
(3) There will be no reduction in the number of STLD positions statewide but, on the suggestion of the Secondary Principals’ Council, they will now be allocated on a needs-basis rather than on a rigid enrolment driven formula.
(4) The NSW Government has allocated $416.6 million for special education services this year, an increase of $17.5 million on the previous year. There will also be $14 million allocated over the next 4 years for training and development for regular classroom teachers in the area of learning difficulties.

310 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many tickets have been allocated to applicants in the first round of the public ticket offer in:
(a) Wingecarribee local government area?
(b) Wollondilly local government area?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

311 MYANBA GORGE RESERVE—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) What works have been undertaken at the Myanba Gorge Reserve in the last 5 years?
(2) What was the nature and cost of these works?
(3) Who was employed to do the works?
(4) What positions did these people hold and where did they come from?

Answer—

(1) In the past 5 years, a visitor destination has been developed at Myanba Gorge, which is within the South East Forests National Park east of Bombala. The main results of these works are picnic facilities and a walking track featuring lookout platforms providing spectacular views of Myanba Creek and Myanba Gorge.
(2) Specific works and their costs were:

the upgrading of a former logging track to two-wheel drive standard	$107,000
carpark and visitor day use area, including disabled access toilet, picnic tables, barbecues and interpretative panels	$30,000
a stabilised earth path for disabled users, 100 metres of boardwalk, three viewing platforms and a 900-metre walking track	$160,000
Total costs	$297,000

(3) The works were undertaken by staff of the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), with specialised assistance from private contractors.
(4) NPWS staff included permanent and temporary field officers and rangers based in Bombala. Guidance and assistance was provided by a NPWS Project Manager based in Narooma. Most contractors were from the local area and all contract works were advertised and tendered locally.

312 FORT DENISON CAFE LEASE—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—
(1) What are the existing sewerage management arrangements at Fort Denison?
(2) How many visitors per day are expected to the proposed cafe at Fort Denison?
(3) What are the proposed toilet and effluent disposal arrangements?
(4) Who will pay the costs of all associated infrastructure?

Answer—

(1) The building contractors currently at the Fort and the public visiting on New Year’s Eve will have portaloos on site for their use.
Work to connect the Fort to the mainland sewer system will commence in January 2000.
(2) Once restoration works are complete, the number of visitors will be restricted to 150 at any one time. The Fort will be open 7 days per week.
(3) As stated in (1), the Fort is to be connected to the mainland sewerage system.
(4) The restoration of Fort Denison has been undertaken with significant sponsorship support from EnergyAustralia. The sewerage connection project is being funded from the National Parks and Wildlife Service Infrastructure Maintenance budget.
313 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mrs Skinner to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Mosman;
North Sydney—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

314 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Slack-Smith to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing first round Olympic tickets in the local government areas of:
(a) Narrabri?
(b) Moree?
(c) Bingara?
(d) Barraba?
(e) Manilla?
(f) Yallaroi?
(g) Brewarrina?
(h) Walgett?
(i) Coonamble?
(j) Gilgandra?
(k) Warren?
(l) Narromine?
(m) Coonabarabran?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

315 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr R.H.L. Smith to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the postcode areas of:
(a) 2549?
(b) 2548?
(c) 2550?
(d) 2546?
(e) 2545?
(f) 2537?
(g) 2536?
(h) 2539?
(i) 2538?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

316 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Souris to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Muswellbrook;
Mudgee;
Coolah;
Coonabarabran;
Merriwa;
Murrarundi;
Scone;
Singleton;
Rylestone;
Gunnedah;
Quirindi—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?




Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

317 SCONE FRESH MEATS PTY LTD—Mr Souris to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

(1) What were the processes involved in granting approval for a development by A.J. Mullan Investments Pty Ltd’s subsidiary Scone Fresh Meats Pty Ltd in 1995?
(2) What was the criteria used to invoke SEPP 34 for this development?
(3) What weight was given to considerable community concern regarding the proposed expansion?
(4) Was the company’s shareholder in liquidation at the time and, if so, in what ways did he assess the likelihood of a financially sustainable development?
(5) Does the department consider financial sustainability a relevant consideration in the approval process?
(6) If not, why not?
(7) If financial sustainability is considered, how does the department go about determining a company’s financial health?
(8) What specific consultations were carried out with the Scone community in relation to this development?

Answer—

(1) The Scone abattoir upgrade was granted development consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 on 28 February 1996. The application was considered under State Environmental Planning Policy No 34—Major Employment Generating Industrial Development where the Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning is the consent authority.
An environmental impact statement (EIS) accompanied the development application and was placed on public exhibition. Submissions from government agencies, council and the community were considered before the Minister made a determination.
(2) SEPP 34 applies to those developments listed in the policy that employ 100 people or more post-construction (or in the case of intensive livestock operations 20 or more people) or involve a capital investment of $20 million or more. Abattoirs are listed in the policy. The upgrade of the Scone Fresh Meats operation involved the employment of 63 people full-time after construction. Therefore, SEPP 34 applied to the proposal under the criteria applicable for intensive livestock operations.
(3) The concerns of the community focussed on the potential for odour generation. The Department of Urban Affairs and Planning considered the views of the community, invited submissions and addressed council’s assessment committee on two occasions. As a result of the department’s comprehensive assessment and community concern, the Minister granted approval to a much reduced increase in kill numbers significantly reducing the risk of unacceptable odour emissions.
(4) No information on this was provided to the department.
(5) The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 provides the context for the consideration of various issues in the development approval process. Section 79C of the Act lists those matters that a consent authority must consider before determining an application. These include social and economic impacts of development in the locality. The department considers the broad social and economic impact of a proposal on the community when it undertakes environmental impact assessment rather than investigating the financial sustainability of the proponent.
(6) The department has no statutory role in determining the financial sustainability of a proponent. The department is obliged to consider any valid Development Application for which the Minister is the consent authority. Any consent granted is tied to the land rather than the person/company it’s granted to.
(7) See (6).
(8) The department notified adjoining and nearby land holders by letter that a Development Application and Environmental Impact Statement had been lodged for the abattoir upgrade. It placed all documents on public exhibition for 1 month in Scone, Newcastle and Sydney. It also placed two advertisements in the regional newspaper advising of the exhibition dates, locations and inviting people to make submissions for the department’s consideration. The department liaised regularly with Scone Shire Council and addressed the council’s assessment committee on two occasions to ensure that local concerns were comprehensively addressed.
319 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Stoner to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Nambucca Shire?
(b) Kempsey Shire?
(c) Hastings Shire?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

320 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Stoner to the Minister for the Olympics—
In relation to the local government areas of:
Nambucca;
Kempsey;
Hastings—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

322 GLOUCESTER HOSPITAL—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—
(1) Has the Mid North Coast Area Health Service commissioned a report by Carla Cranny, or any company associated with Carla Cranny, into health services in the Mid North Coast Area Health Service?
(2) If so, has the report been completed?
(3) If not completed, when will it be completed?
(4) If completed, has the report been released to the public?
(5) If so, when?
(6) If not, why not?
(7) Does the report recommend the Gloucester Hospital be downgraded?
(8) Is eye surgery performed at Gloucester Hospital?
(9) If so, is it proposed in the report or draft report, that any such eye surgery cease to be performed at Gloucester Hospital?
(10) If so, why?
(11) If such eye surgery was to cease at Gloucester Hospital, where would that surgery be undertaken?
(12) Has the performance of such eye surgery at Gloucester Hospital relieved and reduced the waiting list and waiting times for such surgery at Manning Base Hospital?
(13) Are obstetric services available at Gloucester Hospital?
(14) How many doctors practising in Gloucester have experience in obstetrics?
(15) Is it proposed, or does the above report or draft report propose, to close obstetrics at the hospital?
(16) If so, why?
(17) If so, where will “mothers to be” be expected to go to undertake the procedures that would normally have been available at Gloucester Hospital?
(18) How many doctors practising in Gloucester are qualified to give anaesthetics?
(19) How many doctors in Gloucester are Fellows of the College of General Practitioners?
(20) Is it proposed in the report or draft report that surgical services be closed at Gloucester Hospital?
(21) If so, why?
(22) If so, where will patients who would normally attend Gloucester Hospital for such procedures go for future surgical procedures?

Answer—

(1) Yes.
(2) No.
(3) to (6) It is anticipated the final draft report will be released for public comment early in the new year.
(7) The report is yet to be finalised.
(8) Yes.
(9) to (11) The report is yet to be finalised.
(12) Yes.
(13) Yes.
(14) Five of the Gloucester Medical Officers have had obstetric experience. The extent and currency of this experience varies significantly.
(15) to (17) The report is yet to be finalised.
(18) Three.
(19) Four.
(20) to (22) The report is yet to be finalised.
323 FORESTRY OFFICES—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—
(1) How many forestry offices are there in the Hunter area?
(2) How many staff are employed in each office broken into operational forestry staff and clerical staff?
(3) Is it proposed to downgrade any clerical staff positions in any of the offices?
(4) If so, in what offices?
(5) Is it proposed to remove clerical staff entirely from any office?
(6) If so, what offices?
(7) If so, why?
(8) If so, when will this occur?
(9) If so, what will happen to any officers that are made redundant?
(10) If so, how will enquiries into such offices be handled if there is no clerical assistance?
(11) If so, is this in accordance with the policy guidelines of Forestry to be more responsive to the public?

Answer—

(1) Two (Bulahdelah and Newcastle).
(2) There are 9 operational staff and 2 clerical staff at Bulahdelah. There are 25 operational and 25 clerical staff at Newcastle.
(3) No.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) No.
(6) to (11) Not applicable.
324 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Orange?
(b) Cabonne?
(c) Cowra?
(d) Blayney?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

325 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Orange;
Cabonne;
Cowra;
Blayney—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.


326 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Mr Webb to the Minister for the Olympics—
(1) How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Queanbeyan?
(b) Yarrowlumla?
(c) Tallaganda?
(d) Cooma-Monaro?
(e) Bombala?
(f) Snowy River?
(g) Bega Valley?
(2) What was the percentage of successful applicants to those who applied?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to divert scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

17 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 23)

327 PUBLIC SECTOR PAY OFFER—NEW YEAR’S EVE—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to the NSW Government’s New Year’s Eve public sector pay offer, what is the estimated cost of this remuneration for each Government department and agency?

Answer—

It is estimated that the additional cost of the offer is $18 million. The breakdown of this figure is as follows:

Health	$5.5 million
State Rail	$2.5 million
Police	$1.6 million
Fire Brigades	$0.8 million
Community Services	$0.8 million
State Transit	$0.6 million
Corrective Services	$0.5 million
Other	$4.7 million

328 ENTERTAINMENT COSTS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

What entertainment costs has he incurred for himself and his staff, by month and by item, for the periods:
(a) 28 March 1999 to 30 June 1999?
(b) 1 July 1999 to 17 November 1999?


Answer—

(a) and (b) It is a requirement of ministerial offices, ministries and agencies, in accordance with the relevant guidelines regarding “out-of-pocket expenses” and “hospitality- entertainment expenses”, that for any public expenditure upon “functions” to be acceptable, the function to which the charge is related must have a direct business relationship to the portfolio.
329 GRAFFITI SUPPRESSION PROJECTS—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

In relation to grants to local government or community groups for graffiti suppression projects—
(1) How much has been budgeted for the 1999-2000 financial year?
(2) How many submissions have been approved for funding as at 17 November 1999, to whom, for what projects and what funding was approved for each?
(3) How many further submissions for funding have been submitted as at 17 November 1999?
(4) How many submissions have been approved for funding involving “Aerosol Art” as at 17 November 1999?
(5) How many submissions for funding involving “Aerosol Art” have been submitted as at 17 November 1999?
(6) How many submissions were approved for funding for the 1998-99 financial year?
(7) How many submissions were approved for funding involving “Aerosol Art” for the 1998-99 financial year?

Answer—

(1) In 1999-2000, $300,000 has been budgeted for the Beat Graffiti grants scheme. (This covers grants to local government and community groups, including the PCYC, for graffiti suppression projects.)
(2) As at 17 November 1999, 30 submissions had been approved for funding. Details of these projects follow:

Applicant	Project	Description	Grant Funding	Cumulative Grants Fund Total
Ashfield Municipal Council	Darrell Jackson Gardens	Engage a professional artist and a variety of local young people to do two legal themed murals within a well utilised park in Ashfield.	$6,000.00	$6,000.00
Bathurst PCYC	Youth Art Program	Employ an Aboriginal artist to run art workshops for Aboriginal young people; to produce art works for inclusion in the redevelopment of three bus shelters in Kelso.	$3,960.00	$9,960.00
Blacktown City Council (Mount Druitt)	Aerosol Mural Project	Expand council’s existing graffiti program to include an art project involving local young people painting a mural on a council underpass.	$3,850.00	$13,810.00
Channel Free Youth Media Access	Fusion	Provide media training (digital art) and involve emerging aerosol artists in a mentoring scheme with established artists in the creation of a legal mural, production of a broadcast quality video and website.	$5,000.00	$18,810.00
Lane Cove Council	Lane Cove Community Aerosol Art Project	Involve young people interested in aerosol art in the design and production of legal murals. These murals will be painted after the design work with assistance of professional artist and facilitator.	$5,000.00	$23,810.00
Maroubra PCYC	Millennium Rug-Maroubra PCYC	Further develop existing arts and crafts program including weekend graffiti art workshops run by a local artist to paint a mural on a carpet for the foyer of PCYC.	$5,354.00	$29,164.00
Port Macquarie PCYC	Stop the Scribble	Expansion of successful Stop the Scribble program to provide legal artistic opportunities for young people at risk. Recruitment of young people to clean graffiti and create murals for community and public art at three sites in the Hastings area.	$5,950.00	$35,114.00
Queanbeyan City Council	Graffiti Art Project	A group of young offenders from a high school behavioural cottage will work with experienced street artists to discuss, design and paint six large mural art boards to be installed on the walls of the cottage.	$5,000.00	$40,114.00
Riverstone Neighbourhood Centre and Blacktown City Council	Riverstone Youth Development—Beat Graffiti Project	To provide a permanent legal graffiti wall, tuition and alternative art resources including an airbrush and t-shirts for disadvantaged young people in the Riverstone area.	$3,000.00	$43,114.00
Shellharbour City Council	Croom Indoor Stadium Good Graffiti Community Art Project	Employ four artists to work with young people including NESB and indigenous communities to produce images for a good graffiti mural—large scale outdoor mural for Croom Indoor Stadium. Also a public awareness campaign and mural celebration.	$6,000.00	$49,114.00
Sydney City Mission	Poetry ’n’ Motion	A 6-week series of creative writing, discussion and art workshops around graffiti and an exhibition of these art works, involving tutors and young people from seriously disadvantaged backgrounds developing artistic and social skills.	$4,928.00	$54,042.00
Ulladulla and Districts Blessing of the Fleet Festival Committee Inc.	Beat Graffiti Ulladulla SK8 Park	Artists and young people to design and paint murals at the SK8 Park facility which is the centre of national and international youth culture activities, in conjunction with community cultural festival and tourism events.	$5,000.00	$59,042.00
HomeBase Youth Service Tuncurry	Skate Park Mural	A joint project with HomeBase and Tuncurry TAFE will involve young people in the design and painting of a mural on a newly completed Skate Park.	$5,485.90	$64,527.90
PCYC NSW Ltd (Burwood Parramatta Penrith)	YATAWS	In conjunction with Youth By Design conduct a series of aerosol art workshops with art tutors at PCYCs at Burwood, Parramatta and Penrith, displays of artwork, clean up of some graffiti sites, aerosol art murals and a public awareness campaign.	$24,115.00	$88,642.90
Cowra Shire Council	The River Park Youth Art Project	Engage a co-ordinating artist and youth artists to paint a mural on a highly vandalised water reservoir building located near a sports ground in Cowra. Local school aged youth to be involved in submission of designs for incorporation into the mural.	$12,584.85	$101,227.75
Cessnock City Council	Legalised Graffiti Program	Conducting a graffiti audit, educational workshops with a tutor, painting at six legal sites and a graffiti art competition.	$7,890.00	$109,117.75
Mission Employment Punchbowl	YALE Youth Art Language Employment	Engage an artist and involve young people in the production of four murals in the Bankstown, Canterbury, Hurstville and Sutherland areas, providing skills training to disadvantaged young participants.	$7,500.00	$116,617.75
Bulli PCYC	Beat Graffiti—Art on the Streets	A youth arts program in conjunction with club cultural activities including: art exhibitions, excursions, working bees for park restoration and aerosol art. Three major project areas Corrimal, Bulli and Thirroul at PCYCs, parks and Seaside Arts Festival.	$15,000.00	$131,617.75
Hornsby Shire Council	Graffiti Solutions Project	A comprehensive graffiti management program involving: rapid response at target sites, a graffiti policy, a graffiti reporting hotline to council, establishment of legal sites and a community art project including a workshop, mini-murals and large mural.	$13,000.00	$144,617.75
WAYS Waverley Action for Youth Services	Beach Front Urban Art Project	A program involving skills development, access to education, training and employment for young people involved in the design and painting of a 100-metre themed wall mural at the Bondi Olympic venue.	$15,000.00	$159,617.75
Woolloomooloo Youth and Children’s Service Providers Group—Baptist Inner City Ministries	Beat Graffiti	A strategy involving three major projects. Establishment and maintenance of a legal tagging wall; painting a multicultural mural and establishment of a Graffiti Response Team, including a skills program and employment for young trainees.	$15,000.00	$174,617.75
Auburn Council	Graffiti Mural Design	Anti waste theme and multicultural graffiti murals to be designed and painted in the Auburn area by local young people.	$11,330.00	$185,947.75
Sutherland Shire Council and Sutherland College of TAFE	Cronulla Pedestrian Tunnel	Embellishment of a pedestrian tunnel near Cronulla Railway Station and the ferry wharf. Mural project theme—underwater scene local bay areas. Employ tutors, co-ordinators and lecturers through TAFE Youth By Design and local young people.	$15,000.00	$200,947.75
Warringah Council	Warringah Graffiti Project	Expansion of successful graffiti project. Employ a well-known graffiti artist to co-ordinate a program of mobile art tutoring sessions and seven murals. Inspect, document and clean up illegal graffiti by council maintenance and graffiti crew participants.	$15,000.00	$215,947.75
North Sydney Council and PCYC	Aeroglyphics	Develop cooperative partnerships between agencies and young people. Improve artistic skills of young people through workshops that culminate in permanent and mobile murals, e.g., Royal North Shore Hospital and the Neutral Bay Streetscape. Web page design.	$15,000.00	$230,947.75
Bankstown City Council	Expansion of Moveable Murals and Graffiti Solutions Project	Youth arts program, including aerosol art workshops with tutors covering: art and mural training, voice and drama; community events, murals on council work vans and selected sites, legal walls, job skills and portfolio development and an education kit.	$15,000.00	$245,947.75
Canterbury City Council	Graffiti Task Force	Employ a designated project co-ordinator and establish two project teams to identify local graffiti issues and hotspots and to develop a comprehensive training program including artistic and employment related skills for young people (unemployed and NESB).	$15,000.00	$260,947.75
Marrickville Council	Graffiti Solutions Policy and Practice: Marrickville Experience	Contract a project co-ordinator to consult key stakeholders and develop a best practice policy and procedure. Co-ordinate a series of aerosol art workshops with a professional artist and develop accredited training.	$15,000.00	$275,947.75
Wyong Shire Council	Youth 2000 Arts Program	Engage a community-based advisory/ management committee. Employ a community artist and guest tutors to mentor and work with young people. Plan and design a mural for the regional youth facility. Assist development of a graffiti policy for the shire.	$9,433.00	$285,380.75
Blacktown Youth Services and Blacktown PCYC	Youth Mural Project 2000	An aerosol artist will conduct a series of art workshops and mural projects for local young people, including education on illegal graffiti (tagging) and negotiating legal sites.	($15,000.00) adjusted to $14,619.25	($300,380.75) adjusted to $300,000 fund capacity

(3) As at 17 November 1999, the department had received a further 38 submissions for funding in response to the Beat Graffiti grants scheme advertisement. A total of 68 submissions were received by the department.
(4) As at 17 November 1999, each of the submissions that were approved for funding involve “Aerosol Art” or community art mural works as the primary focus of the project. Some of the submissions also include skills workshops and innovative ideas such as an exhibition of art works and a computer graphics project.
(5) The majority of submissions for funding include Aerosol Art as one component of the project. However, several submissions do not include Aerosol Art. For example, one submission relates to a research project and two submissions are requests for funding for graffiti removal.
(6) and (7) The Premier announced the Graffiti Solutions range of initiatives (which included the Beat Graffiti grants scheme) on 10 February 1999. The grants scheme was advertised with a closing date for applications of 3 September 1999.
Prior to the announcement of the grants scheme, the NSW Premier’s Department had funded two local government pilot projects involving graffiti and Aerosol Art in past financial years. In addition, the NSW Crime Prevention Division had previously funded an Aerosol Arts project in Newcastle from its innovative crime prevention grants funding.

331 M4 VIADUCT, HARRIS PARK—Ms Harrison to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

What plans does the Roads and Traffic Authority have for the land underneath the M4 viaduct at Harris Park?

Answer—

A detailed Review of the Environmental Factors (REF) was undertaken in mid-1998 by the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) in regard to a number of upgrading works for, and the landscaping under, the M4 viaduct at Harris Park. The REF was exhibited to the community.
The RTA is currently preparing a design for the landscaping works and improved drainage beneath the viaduct. The necessary work is programmed to be carried out during the 2001-02 financial year, subject to the availability of funds.
In addition, the RTA is currently planning a shared pedestrian/cycleway from Fox Street, Merrylands, to Melton Street, Silverwater. This project will run beneath the M4 viaduct and will be integrated into the proposed landscaping. Construction is programmed to be carried out during the 2000-01 financial year, subject to the availability of funds.
The RTA will continue to regularly maintain the site to ensure that it is kept in a clean and tidy condition.

332 DRUG AND ALCOHOL COUNSELLING—CORRECTIVE SERVICES—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for Health—

(1) What amount has been committed in the current financial year for drug and/or alcohol counselling in Corrective Services facilities?
(2) What amount has been expended on drug and/or alcohol counselling in Corrective Services facilities to date?

Answer—

(1) and (2) The allocation of funds for drug and/or alcohol counselling within the New South Wales correctional system is a matter for the Minister for Corrective Services.

333 DRUG AND ALCOHOL COUNSELLING—CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

What amount is to be spent by the Department of Corrective Services on drug and alcohol counselling of inmates in New South Wales correctional facilities in the current financial year?

Answer—

The department provides an array of services to inmates with an alcohol and other drug history.
Each correctional centre employs alcohol and other drug service staff who provide programs and services to inmates. During 1998-99, these workers provided services to inmates on 245,109 occasions, an increase of over 67,000 since the previous year. Attendance at alcohol and other drug group sessions during 1998-99 also increased to 22,008. An additional seven alcohol and other drug worker positions have recently been created.
Over $1.3 million has been provided to establish a drug therapeutic unit at Long Bay Correctional Complex which will open in 2000. New detoxification facilities are being established at three of the State’s largest correctional centres at a cost of $9.78 million over the next 4-years. Over $250,000 has been allocated in the current financial year for the establishment of drug-free wings in selected correctional centres.
A new transitional centre for women inmates with an alcohol and other drug problems will be developed in the greater Sydney metropolitan area. This facility has been allocated $1.6 million over the next 3 financial years.
Pharmotherapy stabilisation programs for inmates are currently being expanded through the Corrections Health Service working closely with the Department of Corrective Services. An additional 340 places will be provided to inmates.
The Department incorporates a holistic approach to the needs of inmates and the current budget allocation for the assessment, classification and development of inmates is $72.4 million, which represents an increase of $3 million over the previous year.

334 CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES—STAFFING—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) How many correctional facilities were understaffed as at 1 November 1999 and specify the number for each facility (by name)?
(2) What is the authorized strength for each correctional facility?

Answer—

(1) and (2) As at 1 November 1999, custodial and industrial staff numbers at correctional centres were down 66 from an optimal strength of 2,608.
Broken Hill Correctional Centre and Oberon Correctional Centre are two centres that have coped effectively with the temporary reduction in staff numbers (1 and 4 respectively).
However, centres such as Malabar Special Programs Centre and Mulawa Correctional Centre are operating with staff numbers over establishment (9 and 5 respectively). This arrangement is in line with the Department of Corrective Services’ commitment to providing important needs-based programs such as those offered at these centres.
There are currently 120 recruits, not included in the figures above, who are in training with the Department of Corrective Services. Once fully trained, these recruits will be appointed to positions within correctional centres.

335 YASS TO BOOROWA RAIL LINE—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Is consideration being given to reinstating the rail branch line from the “Main South” near Yass into Boorowa, given that there is existing alignment with most of the infrastructure including rails and sleepers still in place?
(2) If this rail line reopening is not yet under consideration, will he now initiate a review of this proposal?

Answer—

I am advised by the Rail Access Corporation of the following:
(1) and (2) Expressions of interest for disused rail lines across New South Wales were called in late 1998. As the call did not attract any interest from existing or prospective operators in the Galong-Boorowa line, reinstatement of the line is not being considered at this time.

336 BOOROWA AND DISTRICT TRANSPORT NEEDS—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Will the Government give consideration to the public transport needs of Boorowa and district residents by undertaking a full review of the current transport services available, both public and private?
(2) Will he instruct Countrylink to give urgent consideration to diverting present coach services, connecting to Countrylink trains, into Boorowa to provide a regular transport service to residents, including the elderly and disabled, given that this would mean only short deviations from existing Countrylink routes?

Answer—

(1) The Government will consider a review of the public transport needs in Boorowa if requested.
(2) Boorowa is located approximately 53 km from Yass and 46 km from Young which are serviced by rural coach services connecting with XPT trains. Additionally, Boorowa is approximately 34 km from Harden which is a designated stop for Countrylink XPT services. To include Boorowa as a stopping point would mean that the coach would have to deviate from its route, adding almost an hour to the timetable.
Any bus operator interested in operating a commercial service from Boorowa should contact the Department of Transport to make the necessary arrangements.

337 GREATER MURRAY AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Mr Maguire to the Minister for Health—

(1) How many nurses does he require to avoid taking drastic action such as closing several rural hospitals in Greater Murray Area Health Service over Christmas?
(2) How many nurses have applied for the advertised positions and how many have actually been hired?
(3) If the number of applicants outweigh the numbers hired, what was the criteria used to assess the quality of nurses and why were so many declined employment?
(4) Is he aware that many of these unsuccessful applicants have gained employment with private nursing agencies?
(5) Does Greater Murray Area Health Service contract private local nursing agencies to fill casual vacancies?

Answer—

(1) The number of nurses required for each hospital varies. Only one hospital, which currently has two inpatients, will require temporary closure over the Christmas period.
(2) and (3) In the last recruitment drive, three applications were received and all were successful.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Yes, when those agencies are able to supply staff.

339 WAGGA WAGGA BASE HOSPITAL—Mr Maguire to the Minister for Health—

When will he commit to upgrade Wagga Wagga Base Hospital and commit to urgently needed construction of stages 2, 3, 4 and 5?

Answer—

Redevelopment of Wagga Wagga Base Hospital in five stages was a proposal of the former Coalition Government in 1989. I am advised that the former Government, with Ron Phillips as Minister for Health, rejected an expedited completion of the remaining stages. This Government completed Stage 2a in 1997. Further stages will be considered in line with the Area Health Service and State capital expenditures priorities.

340 MR THOMAS ALBERT WATKINS—RTA—Mr Merton to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) Did the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) write to Mr Thomas Albert Watkins in late October 1998 giving him 14 days to give reasons why he should retain his licence?
(2) If so, why did this occur?
(3) If so, if it was on a report of any party to the RTA that his licence should be removed, who made the report?
(4) If so, who investigated such a report?
(5) If so, what was the outcome of that investigation?
(6) Did the RTA subsequently withdraw the notice and apologise?
(7) If so, why?
(8) Has a request been made by Mr Doug Watkins, the son of Mr Thomas Albert Watkins, and his solicitor to the RTA and to the Minister seeking details of the informant and other details?
(9) If so, why is that information not being given?
(10) Was an application made under the Freedom of Information Act to obtain such information?
(11) If so, what was the result of that application?
(12) If the application was refused, why was it refused?

Answer—

(1) to (12) This matter was the subject of an appeal by Mr Doug Watkins to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal that was heard before Judicial Member Smith on 29 November 1999. Judicial Member Smith has reserved his decision.
In the circumstances, it would not be appropriate to comment on this issue.

341 NSW TAFE BUDGET CUTS—Ms Moore to the Minister for Education and Training—

Concerning the impact of budget cuts to NSW TAFE—
(1) What is the extent of any further cuts to TAFE NSW planned for the next financial year, in addition to the cuts of $67 million this financial year?
(2) What is the extent of any further cuts to Sydney Institute for the next financial year, in addition to the cuts of $8 million this financial year?
(3) With Electrical Trades teaching positions at Sydney Institute cut from 64 to 36, Electrical Trades courses withdrawn from Randwick, and very limited enrolment places, how will the Government ensure adequate access to training for potential electricians in the eastern suburbs and inner city?
(4) With the budget cuts and subsequent staffing cuts severely reducing library services and library opening hours at the East Sydney TAFE campus, how will the Government ensure adequate library facilities for the TAFE Associate Diploma courses at East Sydney campus?
(5) With the budget cuts and subsequent staffing cuts severely reducing library services and library opening hours at the East Sydney TAFE campus, how will the Government ensure adequate library facilities for the independent National Art School, which is jointly located and shares facilities with the East Sydney campus?
(6) Given the massive budget cuts to TAFE NSW, what courses will no longer be offered by TAFE?
(7) Who will provide these courses that are no longer run by TAFE NSW?
Answer—

(1) Over the past 4 years, the Carr Labor Government has increased the budget of TAFE NSW by $53 million. New South Wales spends more on TAFE than any other State, and in 1999-2000, TAFE NSW’s budget is $1.192 billion. TAFE NSW is the largest training provider in Australia, with the number of places growing from 411,000 in 1995 to 445,000 this year.
Over the same period, the Commonwealth Government has cut some $75 million from vocational education and training (VET) in New South Wales. The Australian National Training Authority (ANTA), which distributes Commonwealth funds, requires States to create Growth through efficiencies, which means that all increases in public VET provision must be funded without the assistance of Commonwealth growth funding.
(2) The future level of funding available to the Sydney Institute is dependent on the provision of vocational education and training funds by the Commonwealth to New South Wales.
(3) Sydney Institute’s provision is adequate to meet demand for apprentice training in electrical trades.
(4) The library at the East Sydney Campus will continue to support all TAFE (and National Art School) courses.
(5) Refer to answer (4) regarding Library Services.
(6) Provision of courses is demand driven, with student demand, industry requirements and employment opportunities taken into consideration. Demand for TAFE courses is increasing and it is expected that the growth in enrolments will continue.
(7) Not applicable.

342 GROUP HOME STAFF TRANSFERS—Mr O’Doherty to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

(1) What incentives will be offered to Department of Community Services group home staff to transfer to the non-government sector?
(2) How many staff have been targeted to move sectors?
(3) What is the anticipated cost of the incentives?
(4) Has this cost been included in the savings required by Treasury or will it be drawn from the department’s existing budget?

Answer—

(1) While no incentives are being offered for group home staff to transfer to the non-government sector, the Department of Community Services, under advice from the Premier’s Department, has put the following position to the Public Service Association in regard to the entitlements of staff:
Where employment is offered with a non-government service provider and is accepted by an employee, the benchmark set of employment arrangements and conditions (to be negotiated in the context of the EOI process), is to include the following:
(a) Eligible employees will be defined as permanent full-time and part-time staff, temporary staff who have been engaged for a period in excess of 12 months and casual employees who have been regularly engaged for a continuous period of 12 months or more.
(b) Application of the protection provisions shall only apply to the initial contract covering the work, and not to subsequent contracts with the same or different employers.
(c) A guarantee of employment with the new employer of up to 3 years for those eligible employees who accept an offer, subject to satisfactory service. For eligible employees who have been engaged for less than 3 years, entitlements are still being negotiated.
(d) Recognition of employee’s Government service through the following initiatives:
(i) As per legislative requirements, payout all accrued recreation leave, long service leave and leave loading entitlements. Where the employment period is between 5 and 10 years, long service leave will be paid on a pro rate basis; and
(ii) Transfer to the new employer of a sick leave bank of 10 days for each permanent full-time and part-time employee. Where, at the date of transfer, the employee has a current or accrued sick leave value of less than 10 days, the lesser amount shall be banked; and
(iii) Service is to be deemed to be continuous for the following purposes:
· accrual of long service leave;
· access to parental leave;
· recognition of relevant service; and
· access to sick leave, personal/carer’s leave, or other leave, where a waiting period is prescribed under the relevant industrial instrument.
(e) Partial redundancy payment for eligible employees who accept an offer of employment with the new employer in terms detailed above (payment to be up to 20 weeks based on age and length of service).
(2) No Department of Community Services staff have been targeted to move sectors.
(3) Costs of staff entitlements as detailed in (1) will be arrived at on a case by case basis.
(4) The usual procedure is for redundancy costs to be met by Treasury.
343 NON-GOVERNMENT GROUP HOMES—Mr O’Doherty to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

What percentage of placements in non-government group homes has broken down, resulting in the requirement for new government or non-government placements to be found, for each of the last 4 years?

Answer—

Until the inaugural Ageing and Disability Department 1997 Self-Assessment process, there was no requirement for non-government organisations (NGOs) to report on the exits of clients funded by ADD.
Many services are able to respond in a flexible manner to the changing needs of their clientele. Clients are able to move between providers and to access different services and living arrangements according to their changing needs. Such moves are usually negotiated between services, clients and their support network.
ADD respects the privacy and self-determination of clients and it is generally only controversial exits and placement breakdowns that ADD Central is called upon to mediate and resolve.
As the House has been previously advised, such controversial exits and placement breakdowns in the NGO sector amount to 11 since the 1997 inaugural Self-Assessment.
The Community Services Commission has a primary role to resolve individual complaints from service users where he/she feels that a service provider has acted without due process and outside the scope of guidelines mandated by ADD.

HUNTER AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Mr Orkopoulos to the Minister for Health—

(1) What were the budgetary allocations to the Hunter Area Health Service in each of the past 10 years?
(2) What were the allocations to Belmont District Hospital for each of those years by the Hunter Area Health Service?

Answer—

(1) Initial cash allocations were:

	$ million			$ million
1990-91	259.3		1995-96	329.6
1991-92	273.9		1996-97	352.9
1992-93	287.5		1997-98	370.9
1993-94	295.6		1998-99	413.2
1994-95	308.3		1999-2000	424.6

(2) Total expenditure for Belmont Hospital was:

	$ million			$ million
1990-91	14.424		1995-96	15.927
1991-92	15.174		1996-97	15.689
1992-93	15.385		1997-98	16.495
1993/94	13.501		1998/99	17.960*
1994/95	15.133		1999/2000	†

* Included additional PAS funds to address long waiting lists.
† Expenditure for 1999/2000 will not be known until the end of the financial year.

345 GOVERNANCE OF COMPANIES—Mr Orkopoulos to the Minister for Police representing the Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—

What steps have been taken to transfer the governance of companies incorporated by an Act of the New South Wales Parliament prior to 1874 to provisions of the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission?

Answer—

There are approximately 400 principal Private Acts in force in New South Wales. As the honourable member would appreciate, it is now over 150 years since some of the Acts were passed which set up the various joint stock companies and other bodies. While a proportion of the Acts govern bodies which are known to be active, the majority appear to refer to entities which no longer exist or which have been subsumed into other entities.
The Government has resolved to review joint stock companies and other bodies that have been established under Private Acts of the New South Wales Parliament.
My department has made preliminary inquiries as to the ongoing existence of some of these bodies but, given the numbers involved, it is a time-consuming exercise that will require considerable resources. The relevant Acts cannot be repealed or amended so as to transfer governance for the bodies to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission until such investigations have been made as to do otherwise may prejudice the rights of shareholders or members of those companies which still exist.

346 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Shoalhaven?
(b) Kiama?
(c) Wollongong?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to diver scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

347 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Olympics—

In relation to the local government areas of:
Wingecarribee;
Wollondilly;
Shoalhaven;
Kiama;
Wollongong—
How many people residing in each of the above local government areas:
(a) joined the Olympic Club?
(b) obtained tickets to any Olympic event?
(c) obtained tickets to the Opening Ceremony?
(d) obtained tickets to the Closing Ceremony?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised. Similarly, the Olympic Club is an ongoing program.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to diver scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

348 OLYMPIC TICKET ALLOCATION—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Olympics—

How many people were successful in purchasing Olympic tickets in the first public round of the Olympic ticket offer in the local government areas of:
(a) Campbelltown?
(b) Ku-ring-gai?

Answer—

The Olympic Ticket Allocation process is ongoing. This includes the conduct of the first round ballot, which has a number of stages to it and has yet to be completely finalised.
Therefore, it would be unreasonable to diver scarce resources to answer this question especially as the SOCOG staff continue their work towards a successful Olympic Games.

349 TEACHERS’ WAGES—Mr R.H.L. Smith to the Minister for Education and Training—
(1) Will he detail weekly wage rates for teachers in public schools comparable to the private school sector and comparable to others of the same profession status including police?
(2) When will he provide Bega with a new public high school?
(3) Will he outline money spent in private schools in my region and draw up a comparable table for public schools in my region?
(4) Will he ask his Director-General to adopt a conciliatory response to the teachers’ award claim and in a gesture of good will propose an interim wage increase that does not undermine and demoralise the teaching profession further?
(5) Will he direct his department to negotiate with the NSW Teachers Federation to achieve an award outcome commensurate with teachers’ worth and so restore the shattered morale of New South Wales teachers?

Answer—

(1) Details of existing rates of pay for teachers and the rates of pay offered in the proposed new award are available at the Department of Education and Training’s Website at http://www.det.nsw.edu.au/.
(2) A master plan for the upgrade of Bega High School to a six-stream high school has been developed in consultation with the school community. The project will be taken into consideration for inclusion on a forward capital works program.
(3) Funds provided to non-government schools in the Bega electorate amounted to $2,337,977 in 1998-99. This funding was provided in the form of per capita grants, textbook allowances and interest subsidies under schemes in place for non-government schools. Government schools in the Bega electorate received funding of $41,824,680 during 1998-99 in the form of allocations for global budget allocations and departmental expenditure incurred on their behalf for properties, maintenance, capital works and staff salaries. In addition, Bega Electorate government schools received funding under a variety of specific purpose programs.
(4) See (1).
(5) See (1).


350 COUNTRYLINK—Mr Souris to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) Why is the “13 2232” Countrylink reservations number almost perpetually engaged?
(2) On the rare occasions when a call on “13 2232” is connected, why is it standard for a wait of 25 to 40 minutes for an operator (dial “0”)?
(3) Does he believe the Countrylink phone reservations system is adequate for the needs of intending passengers now that there are hardly any staffed stations or any Countrylink travel centres?

Answer—

(1) to (3) Countrylink recently purchased a new $8 million IBM reservation system called TravelLink which is being installed by a contractor.
There have been problems with the system which in turn has caused inconvenience to Countrylink customers. Following technical improvements that have been made, waiting times have been reduced substantially. However, more work is being undertaken.
Countrylink apologises for the inconvenience and has advised that the contractor is working to resolve the problems as a matter of priority.
Ten extra call centre staff have been hired and additional overtime is being worked to reduce telephone booking waiting times. Extra staff are also working at Central Station.
Once fully operational, the new reservation system will offer customers a more efficient and integrated booking system.
Countrylink staff have been working hard in trying conditions during this implementation period and I thank them and Countrylink patrons for their patience.
351 HIGH SCHOOLS—TAREE AREA—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Education and Training—
(1) What are the number of students that attend high schools in the Taree area whose place of residence are south of the Martin Bridge on the Manning River?
(2) What numbers attend what high schools in Taree?
(3) Is there any proposal that a high school would be erected in the area of Old Bar?
(4) If so, what are the details of that proposal?
(5) If so, when would it be expected that such a high school be erected?
(6) If not, why not?
(7) What are the number of students from a catchment area that are deemed sufficient for the department to consider the erection of a new high school in a catchment area not specifically serviced by a high school?
(8) Does the department have any proposal to build another high school in the Taree area?
(9) If so, where?
(10) If so, when?

Answer—

(1) At the 1996 Census, there were 530 secondary school students residing in the Taree high schools’ catchments south of the Manning River.
(2) In 1999, there are 1,037 students enrolled at Taree High School, 1,104 at Chatham High School, 693 at St Clare High School, and Taree Christian Community School has 170 secondary enrolments.
(3) No.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
(6) There is insufficient demographic demand in the Old Bar area to justify a viable high school. There is existing provision available in Taree.
(7) A combination of factors is required depending on the particular circumstances. As a generality, the department’s minimum requirements would be a threshold of at least 2,500 occupied homes within the proposed catchment, a threshold population of about 7,500 (depending on age structure), 600 children in the proposed feeder primary schools, an initial Y7-12 enrolment of 300 growing to a sustained 500-600 students over the longer term and continued optimum utilisation of existing schools from their reduced catchment areas.
(8) No.
(9) Not applicable.
(10) Not applicable.
352 3x3 FUNDING—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) What is the breakdown per electorate of 3x3 funds actually spent in 1998-99?
(2) What is the breakdown per electorate of 3x3 funds estimated to be spent in 1999-2000?
(3) How are 3x3 funds distributed amongst State electorate areas?
(4) What criteria is used to justify 3x3 funding allocations for each electorate?

Answer—

(1) and (2) I refer the honourable member to the answer to Question on Notice No 60 from the General Purpose Standing Committee No 4 in relation to the 1999 Budget Estimates Hearings. In that response, 3x3 funded works are identified by individual project number and not by electorate.
(3) Allocations to projects under the 3x3 Program are strictly on a needs basis, with funds directed towards ongoing projects to ensure completion and at new high priority works across the State.
(4) Legislation determines the criteria to be taken into account when deciding how 3x3 Program funding is spent. The criteria is as follows:
· Benefits exceed expenditure.
· Safe roads and road safety.
· Increase competitiveness of New South Wales industry.
· Facilitate and encourage tourism.
· Improve road network efficiency.
· Reduce maintenance costs.
· Community access.
· Transport interchange operations.
· Bus and transit lanes by providing off-street parking.
· Improve public transport on major arterials.

353 RTA INSPECTORS—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) How many RTA inspectors are available to patrol the North Coast from Mount White to the Tweed?
(2) At what locations along the North Coast are RTA inspectors stationed?
(3) How many vehicles are at each location?
(4) How many staff are stationed at each location?
(5) What are the rostered hours of each location?
(6) Is Quarry Hill a station for RTA inspectors?
(7) Are random areas or locations on the North Coast used by RTA inspectors?
(8) Are RTA inspectors entitled to overtime?
(9) If so, after what hours of work are inspectors entitled to overtime?
(10) How much per hour is the overtime rate?
(11) In the financial year 1998-99, how much (in total) overtime was paid to RTA inspectors stationed on the North Coast?
(12) How much has been paid in overtime for the period 1 July 1999 to 31 October 1999?
(13) Are RTA inspectors on the North Coast limited to the number of overtime hours they can work and hence claim overtime rates?
(14) What is the job description of RTA inspectors on the North Coast?
(15) Do RTA inspectors have a quota to meet in terms of the number of heavy vehicles to be inspected in any one shift?
(16) In the financial year 1998-99, how many heavy vehicles on the North Coast were inspected by RTA inspectors?
(17) In the period 1 July 199 to 31 October 1999, how many heavy vehicles on the North Coast were inspected by RTA inspectors?
(18) In the financial year 1998-99, how many vehicles on the North Coast were issued defect notices of any kind?
(19) In the period 1 July 1999 to 31 October 1999, how many vehicles on the North Coast were issued defect notices of any kind?

Answer—

(1) On average, 23.
(2) Taree, Carrington (Newcastle), Maitland, West Gosford, Kempsey, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Lismore and Murwillumbah.
(3) Vehicle numbers at the listed locations are:

Taree	1
Carrington (Newcastle)	16
Maitland	1
West Gosford	13
Kempsey	3
Coffs Harbour	3
Grafton	3
Lismore	3
Murwillumbah	3

(4) RTA inspection staff numbers at the listed locations are:

Taree	2
Carrington (Newcastle)	26
Maitland	2
West Gosford	25
Kempsey	6
Coffs Harbour	5
Grafton	4
Lismore	5
Murwillumbah	5

(5) Vehicle Regulation Inspectors are shift workers and their start/finish times are varied to meet the business needs of the activity undertaken. There are no fixed rostered times for any individual location.
(6) Quarry Hill is one of many permanent sites located throughout the State used to carry out inspections of heavy vehicles. The sites are also available for use as truck rest areas when not being used for heavy vehicle inspections.
(7) Yes.
(8) Yes.
(9) Inspectors work a 35-hour week. That equates to a 7-hour and 22-minute day, with 1 day in 20 rostered off. Times worked in excess of 7 hours and 22 minutes per shift are paid at overtime rates.
(10) For a Level C inspector the rate is $37.83/hr at time and one-half and $50.44/hr at double time.
(11) $94,780.
(12) $32,300.
(13) The RTA manages the level of overtime worked, which is dependent upon demand.
(14) An Inspector Vehicle Regulation Level C is required to conduct inspections of all types and classes of vehicles and their drivers to ensure compliance with Authorised Inspection Station Scheme Business Rules, vehicle standards, vehicle mass and driving hour restrictions. The key accountabilities of the job are:
· ensure compliance with relevant Regulations and Acts administered by the Authority that include vehicle registration, operation permits, log books, excess mass permits and weight of loads;
· issue infringement notices and prepare breach reports, where appropriate, to comply with relevant Regulations and Acts of Parliament and prepare reports and give evidence at court where necessary;
· ensure compliance with relevant Regulation and Acts administered by the Authority by using specialised equipment to conduct inspections of vehicles;
· ensure compliance with relevant procedures by conducting visits in accordance with rules for the Authorised Inspection Station Scheme;
· ensure compliance with relevant Acts and Regulations by inspecting all types of vehicles, for the purpose of identification of engine, chassis/VIN numbers and compliance plate details;
· ensure compliance with relevant construction and equipment standards by conducting inspection of all types and classes of vehicles which are under the Heavy Vehicle Inspection Scheme; and
· ensure compliance with approved procedures by conducting audits of the Authorised Inspection Station Scheme.
(15) No.
(16) 123,471 at the Mount White heavy vehicle checking station plus 53,098 intercepts during fixed or mobile operations.
(17) 44,496 at the Mount White heavy vehicle checking station plus 22,843 intercepts during fixed or mobile operations.
(18) 4,322.
(19) 1,639.
354 SOUTHERN RFA RECREATION AND TOURISM STUDY—Mr Webb to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—

In regard to the Southern RFA Recreation and Tourism Study, in particular a State forest user survey—
(1) Which department and/or Minister in the NSW Government commissioned this survey?
(2) How was Hassall & Associates chosen and what were the selection criteria?
(3) If the selection was not by open competitive tender, what rationale was used to justify the selection of tenders?
(4) What were the terms of reference issued to Hassall & Associates for this task?
(5) How did Hassall & Associates select the recipients of the survey form?
(6) If the selection of recipients was the result of a sampling technique, what was assumed as the population and what was the sampling technique adopted (together with the rationale for using such a technique)?
(7) What is the cost of this survey, including Hassall & Associates contract price?
(8) What agency is funding the survey contract and what is the origin of that funding (e.g., is it being funded from the Federal funding associated with the RFA process)?
(9) What connection has this survey with the South East Wilderness Assessment Study?

Answer—

(1) to (9) These questions should be referred to my colleague, the Hon Dr Andrew Refshauge MP, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, whose department commissioned the study.

355 SOUTHERN RFA RECREATION AND TOURISM STUDY—Mr Webb to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

In regard to the Southern RFA Recreation and Tourism Study, in particular a State forest user survey—
(1) Which department and/or Minister in the NSW Government commissioned this survey?
(2) How was Hassall & Associates chosen and what were the selection criteria?
(3) If the selection was not by open competitive tender, what rationale was used to justify the selection of tenders?
(4) What were the terms of reference issued to Hassall & Associates for this task?
(5) How did Hassall & Associates select the recipients of the survey form?
(6) If the selection of recipients was the result of a sampling technique, what was assumed as the population and what was the sampling technique adopted (together with the rationale for using such a technique)?
(7) What is the cost of this survey, including Hassall & Associates contract price?
(8) What agency is funding the survey contract and what is the origin of that funding (e.g., is it being funded from the Federal funding associated with the RFA process)?
(9) What connection has this survey with the South East Wilderness Assessment Study?

Answer—

(1) to (9) These questions should be referred to my colleague, the Hon Dr Andrew Refshauge MP, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, whose department commissioned the study.

356 SOUTHERN RFA RECREATION AND TOURISM STUDY—Mr Webb to the Minister for Small Business and Minister for Tourism—

In regard to the Southern RFA Recreation and Tourism Study, in particular a State forest user survey—
(1) Which department and/or Minister in the NSW Government commissioned this survey?
(2) How was Hassall & Associates chosen and what were the selection criteria?
(3) If the selection was not by open competitive tender, what rationale was used to justify the selection of tenders?
(4) What were the terms of reference issued to Hassall & Associates for this task?
(5) How did Hassall & Associates select the recipients of the survey form?
(6) If the selection of recipients was the result of a sampling technique, what was assumed as the population and what was the sampling technique adopted (together with the rationale for using such a technique)?
(7) What is the cost of this survey, including Hassall & Associates contract price?
(8) What agency is funding the survey contract and what is the origin of that funding (e.g., is it being funded from the Federal funding associated with the RFA process)?
(9) What connection has this survey with the South East Wilderness Assessment Study?
Answer—

(1) to (9) These questions should be referred to my colleague, the Hon Dr Andrew Refshauge MP, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, whose department commissioned the study.

18 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 24)

357 CHATSWOOD POLICE STATION—Mr Collins to the Minister for Police—

(1) Is he aware of severe overcrowding and inadequate premises at Chatswood Police Station?
(2) Does he acknowledge the expansion of Chatswood as a major regional centre providing more commercial and retail premises?
(3) What improvements will be made to assist police to fulfil their role operating from Chatswood?
(4) When will a new police station be constructed?
(5) What details can he provide of new capital works expenditure?
(6) Given the urgent need for improvements, has he established a guaranteed delivery time to provide such relief to Chatswood police?

Answer—

(1) to (6) The 1999-2000 Budget Papers indicated that approval had been given to progress the provision of a police station at Chatswood as a joint development. I am advised by Property Services Branch of the Police Service that a rezoning application has been submitted to Willoughby Council for approval.

358 COMPLAINTS—OLYMPIC TICKET APPLICANTS—Mr Collins to the Minister for the Olympics—

(1) How many complaints has he received from Olympic ticket applicants on the grounds that they were misled by this year’s SOCOG offer?
(2) How many complainants have asked for refunds?
(3) What steps has he taken to address the objections of such complainants?
(4) Will refunds be made available where they are sought?

Answer—

(1) to (4) SOCOG’s refund policy has been well publicised and the vast majority of refunds arising from the public ticket offer have now been issued.

359 INTENSIVE READING CLASSES—WILLOUGHBY PUBLIC SCHOOL—Mr Collins to the Minister for Education and Training—

(1) Does his department propose to close down intensive reading classes at Willoughby Public School?
(2) Will this disadvantage and inconvenience needy students at Willoughby Public School?
(3) Will he review this decision to cut intensive reading services at Willoughby?


Answer—

(1) Willoughby Public School currently has one Intensive Reading class. As well as being available for students in the Northern Beaches, students outside Northern Beaches have access to the program. Northern Beaches is changing the focus of this program to helping students in their own schools.
Students with severe reading difficulties benefit from ongoing support and opportunities within their own classrooms to apply newly mastered skills. Such students commonly experience difficulties in generalising/transferring new information and skills in other situations.
Northern Beaches is not taking away the service for these students but, rather, providing it in a different manner over a longer period of time.
(2) No. This class was not exclusively for students from Willoughby Public School but serviced students from schools in both Northern Beaches and Ryde districts. Students at Willoughby Public School and all other primary schools in the Northern Beaches district will now have access to a district team to assist students with severe learning difficulties in their home schools. The program is now about students getting help when and where they need it most.
Classroom teachers will work closely with specialist staff to provide support. Students will not have to travel to another school to receive help. They can remain with their classmates and participate fully in the learning activities provided by their home school. This has obvious benefits for the students.
Currently, some students in need of intensive reading programs on the Northern Beaches don’t gain access to the programs or when they do gain access, there is usually less than optimal time in the program.
In 2000, students who need intensive reading programs will be able to access assistance within their own school through improved specialist support services.
(3) No. Under the new arrangements, assistance to students with learning difficulties will improve. Schools in the Northern Beaches will have greater flexibility in meeting the literacy needs of their students with severe learning difficulties.
The decisions made by the Northern Beaches district have the support of the primary principals council whose views were represented in the allocation of Support Teachers Learning Difficulties.
More than ever before, students in New South Wales with learning difficulties will have greater access to specialist literacy support in their own school.

360 STUDENT NUMBERS—CAMMERAY PUBLIC SCHOOL—Mr Collins to the Minister for Education and Training—

(1) What are the projected student numbers for Cammeray Public School for the next 3 financial years?
(2) Do these figures reflect a significant increase in student numbers in recent years?
(3) Does he acknowledge that medium-density housing policies will permanently increase student numbers at the school?
(4) Have such policies already caused his department to use demountable classrooms as an interim measure?
(5) Will he provide permanent building improvements to Cammeray Public School to cope with increased demand for extra student places?

Answer—

(1) The projected student numbers at Cammeray Public School are:

2000	453
2001	495
2002	528

(2) The projected student numbers for 2002 represent an increase from the 1999 student enrolment of 419.
(3) Generally, there is an increase in school student numbers in the early years after any residential development, including medium-density, however the number stabilises and then declines over time.
(4) Yes.
(5) Approval has been given for preliminary planning for improved permanent facilities. Concept options will be presented to the school community for comment.
361 PUBLIC TRADING ENTERPRISES—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

What community service obligations have been approved by the NSW Government for each Public Trading Enterprise and what funding subsidy has been agreed in each case as at:
(a) 1 July 1998?
(b) 1 July 1999?
(c) 18 November 1999?

Answer—

(a) to (c) Under the Government’s Community Service Obligation (CSO) Policy, Public Trading Enterprises (PTEs) are explicitly funded for carrying out non-commercial activities having social objectives on behalf of the Government.
The following appendix provides the requested information regarding CSO payments. This information is already available in public forecasts in the Budget Papers and the actuals in the agencies’ annual reports.
COMMUNITY SERVICE OBLIGATION PAYMENTS

Public Trading Enterprise	1 July 1998	1 July 1999	18 Nov 1999	Purpose
	For year 1998-99 $000	For Year 1999-2000 $000	For Year 1999-2000 $000
Advance Energy	2,500	2,000	2,000	Pensioner concessions and life support rebates.
Australian Inland	2,600	485	485
EnergyAustralia	28,500	26,200	26,200
Integral Energy	13,069	13,900	13,900
North Power	8,000	8,700	8,700
Great Southern Energy	4,176	4,200	4,200
Darling Harbour Authority	4,665	0	0	Public facilities management.
Freight Rail Corporation	80,000	76,500	76,500	Non-commercial freight services.
Rail Access Corporation	172,500	170,950	170,950	Non-commercial line services.
Newcastle Port Corporation	175	130	130	Management fee for Crown assets.
Hunter Water Corporation	8,286	8,200	8,200	Pensioner concessions and exempt properties.
Sydney Water	105,238	95,225	95,225	Pensioner concessions, exempt properties, sewer backlog program, transitional rebates and other CSOs.
State Transit Authority	167,837	175,644	175,644	School student transport, pensioner and other concessions.
State Rail Authority	610,704	567,901	567,901	School student transport, pensioner and other concessions, maintenance grants and operational deficit funding.
State Forest Authority of New South Wales	15,506	10,631	10,631	Recreational use of forests, community fire protection, concessional pricing, etc.
Note: 1. Being more accurate, actuals for the year 1998-99 are provided instead of the Budget approvals for 1998-99 as at 1 July 1998. 2. As of 18 November 1999, the Budget for 2000-01 is yet to be approved. The 1999-2000 latest estimates are therefore being provided. 3. The 1998-99 payments to Australian Inland include a one-off lump sum payment of $2.2 million for enhancing electricity supply to Balranald.

362 SUPERANNUATION ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to asset acquisitions and the computer upgrade for the Superannuation Administration Authority over the past 3 years—
(1) What is the detailed explanation for the high increase in asset acquisitions for 1998-99?
(2) What were the asset acquisitions delayed from 1997-98 to 1998-99?
(3) What are the details of the computer system upgrade, including itemised costs for all programming, software, training and hardware?
(4) What was the detailed explanation for the increase in hardware capacity and the detailed breakdown of any cost increases?

Answer—

(1) As stated in the Superannuation Administration Authority’s Annual Report for 1998, “In the past 18 months SAA has implemented a strategy of replacing outdated legacy administration systems and call centre technology with modern, flexible Y2K compliant systems to improve efficiency and productivity.” The increase in asset acquisitions for 1998-99 over expenditure in the previous year is associated with this work.
(2) With a major project of this nature, different levels of expenditure are incurred at different times over the course of the project, causing changes in the expenditures from year to year.
(3) The expenditure on new hardware largely represents the replacement of existing equipment, some of which was over 20 years old and had reached the end of its useful life. Moreover, as reported in SAA’s 1998 annual report, one of the authority’s strategic initiatives for 1998-99 was the “application of E-commerce and advanced telecommunications technologies”. Some expenditure on new hardware was to enable the provision of these new services. Details are outlined in SAA’s annual reports tabled in Parliament.
(4) Answered in (3) above.


363 SUPERANNUATION ADMINISTRATION CORPORATION—Mr Debnam to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

In relation to the Statement of Corporate Intent for the Superannuation Administration Corporation, what is the detailed basis for the forecast of financial profitability and distributions for the year 1999-2000 and future years?

Answer—

The Superannuation Administration Corporation was corporatised on 26 July 1999. In the intervening period, the board and management have been negotiating with Treasury on many issues which require resolution before the Statement of Corporate Intent can be finalised. A number of issues are yet to be resolved and the final Statement of Corporate Intent is not in place.
The forecast profitability and distributions for the corporation are not available at this stage.

364 TOWRA POINT WETLANDS—Mr Kerr to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—

(1) (a) Does the Draft Plan of Management and Strategic Plan for Towra Point place strong emphasis on the protection of Sydney’s only international wetland, providing inter alia Towra Point is an icon wetland in New South Wales and is of international conservation significance, providing habitats for endangered and migratory wading birds and other wetland species?
(b) Is there evidence of horses’ hoof marks and droppings throughout the wetlands and what action has the National Parks and Wildlife Service taken to prevent the presence of horses on the wetlands?
(2) What types of weeds have been identified in the wetlands and what action is being taken to eradicate these weeds?
(3) Is he aware of the visits of dogs to the wetlands and, if so, do these animals represent a threat to migratory birds?
(4) If dogs do represent a threat to migratory birds in the wetlands, what action has he taken to remove this threat?
(5) What action has he taken before recommendations of the Draft Plan of Management and Strategic Plan can be implemented?

Answer—

(1) to (5) This question should be directed to the Minister for the Environment.

365 BOTANY BAY NATIONAL PARK—Mr Kerr to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) Why has the Plan of Management for Botany Bay National Park not been completed?
(2) When will it be completed?
(3) When will it be available for public comment?
(4) Will the plan be fully resourced and budget funds committed?

Answer—

(1) The draft Plan of Management for Botany Bay National Park is currently being finalised. This will be the first Plan of Management which has been prepared for this national park. As the Government is committed to the development of a plan which fully recognises and promotes the national and international significance of this reserve, preparation of the document has necessitated the resolution of several complex matters, including lengthy discussions with local Aboriginal communities.
(2) The draft Plan of Management is expected to be released in early 2000.
(3) The plan will be subject to a public exhibition period of 3 months. Copies will be available for inspection or purchase at several locations, including the NPWS offices at Nielsen Park, La Perouse, Kurnell, Audley and Hurstville.
(4) A financial impact statement is prepared for all NPWS Plans of Management. This will clearly stipulate funding commitments over the next 5 years.

366 TOWRA POINT WETLANDS—Mr Kerr to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) (a) Does the Draft Plan of Management and Strategic Plan for Towra Point place strong emphasis on the protection of Sydney’s only international wetland, providing inter alia Towra Point is an icon wetland in New South Wales and is of international conservation significance, providing habitats for endangered and migratory wading birds and other wetland species?
(b) Is there evidence of horses’ hoof marks and droppings throughout the wetlands and what action has the National Parks and Wildlife Service taken to prevent the presence of horses on the wetlands?
(2) What types of weeds have been identified in the wetlands and what action is being taken to eradicate these weeds?
(3) Is he aware of the visits of dogs to the wetlands and, if so, do these animals represent a threat to migratory birds?
(4) If dogs do represent a threat to migratory birds in the wetlands, what action has he taken to remove this threat?
(5) What action has he taken before recommendations of the Draft Plan of Management and Strategic Plan can be implemented?

Answer—

(1) (a) Yes.
(b) The National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is aware that illegal horse riding has occurred at Towra Point Nature Reserve. The NPWS liases with the two major horse stables in the area and stresses the need to stay out of the reserves. Where individuals are found undertaking illegal activities, enforcement action is taken by the NPWS, including the issuing of warnings and infringement notices as necessary.
(2) The primary weeds at Towra Point are lantana and bitou. Control programs have been in place over the past 2 years using a combination of NPWS staff and volunteers. The reserve benefits from the work of a dedicated group of regular volunteers, the friends of Towra Point Nature Reserve, with additional assistance from the Green Corps and the Australian Conservation Trust Volunteers. Key successes during this period include the regeneration of the littoral rainforest stand at Weedy Pond.
A weed control plan is currently being developed by the NPWS. The primary objective of the plan is to identify strategic weed control programs over the next 2 years.
(3) Dogs have been periodically observed at Towra Point. The NPWS is midway through a 3-year project undertaking a census of wading birds around Botany Bay. This has revealed that dogs are a problem at all wader sites in the bay.
(4) The NPWS has strict enforcement policies and practices with respect to dogs in nature reserves which are dealt with under the infringement system. A warden is routinely located at Towra Beach, the main area where dogs have been sighted, for 3 days per week over the summer months. In addition, NPWS rangers conduct patrols at various other times.
(5) The NSW Government is committed to the protection of the Towra Point wetlands. The plans and the technical studies which have been conducted over the past 2 years lay the foundation for necessary action by the range of land managers and stakeholders around Botany Bay.
The NPWS has commenced implementation of a number of the key actions to address issues raised in the draft Plan of Management. For example, negotiations with NSW Waterways on the 4-knot zone and seagrass-friendly moorings are well advanced.
367 GREEN ENERGY REQUIREMENTS—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) Which Government departments have met the 6 per cent green energy requirement in:
(a) 1995?
(b) 1996?
(c) 1997?
(d) 1998?
(e) 1999?
(2) Which did not meet this requirement in each of the above years?
(3) Which Government agencies (off-Budget) have:
(a) met;
(a) failed to reach;
those targets in those years?

Answer—

(1) The Government Energy Management Policy does not include a specific requirement for agencies to purchase green energy. The Ministry of Energy and Utilities’ 1999 Policy Start-Up Kit and other GEMP supporting documents refer to the inclusion, from July 1997, of 5% (later increased to 6%) Green Power in Government electricity contracts available to departments. The November 1998 document New Greenhouse Initiatives (a component of the NSW Greenhouse Action Plan 1998) also recognises that the Government requires departments benefiting from the Government’s bulk electricity purchasing contracts to take 6% Green Power. Green Power is the SEDA approved green energy product available from electricity retail suppliers.
The Department of Public Works and Services organises contracts for the supply of goods and services, such as electricity, to Government agencies, local government and other non-profit organisations. Schedule 1 Departments (as classified under the Public Sector Management Act 1988) are required to buy under Government contracts. Schedule 3 Declared Authorities and Non-scheduled Agencies, as well as local government and non-profit organisations, may, but are not required to, purchase under Government contracts. Schedule 1 and Schedule 3 include both budget and off-budget agencies.
Under the phased implementation of retail competition under the National Electricity Market, only sites with over a certain minimum annual electricity consumption (contestable sites) are eligible to choose their electricity retailer. Customers not meeting this minimum criterion must continue to purchase electricity from their franchise electricity retailer. Therefore, only those sites large enough to be contestable are eligible to purchase their electricity through contracts organised by the Department of Public Works and Services.
From 1 July 1997, with the approval of the Minister for Public Works and Services, 5% Green Power was included in Government electricity contracts for the contestable sites of Schedule 1 Departments. Contestable sites of Schedule 3 Declared Authorities and Non-scheduled Agencies, local government and non-profit organisations were encouraged to utilise the Government electricity contract and purchase 5% Green Power. The contract also permits agencies to purchase more than the minimum if they wish to do so.
On 13 October 1998 the State Contracts Control Board approved an increase in the amount of Green Power in Government contracts from 5% to 6%, to take effect immediately for new contracts, and from 1 July 1999 for all other contracts.
Agencies with non-contestable sites, and smaller non-contestable sites of some larger agencies, are not eligible to purchase under the contract. The current timetable for full contestability for all customers is 1 January 2001. However, individual agencies with non-contestable sites may voluntarily choose to purchase Green Power for those sites from their franchise retailer, where this product is available.
The Department of Public Works and Services has provided lists of Government agencies that have purchased electricity through Government contracts (see below). In addition, energy use data (including Green Power usage) is currently being collected from Government agencies under the Government Energy Management Policy and it is planned that data on aggregate Green Power use will be available by March 2000.
(a) and (b) The first green energy accreditation scheme was launched by the Sustainable Energy Development Authority (SEDA) in 1997, and hence agencies did not have the opportunity to purchase approved Green Power in 1995 and 1996.

(c) to (e) Note: The lists below have been provided by the Department of Public Works and Services and show all Government agencies that purchased 5% and later 6% (and in some cases more, as indicated in brackets) Green Power through Government contracts in 1997, 1998 and 1999. The lists include only those contestable sites of Government agencies that have purchased electricity through Government contracts. The Department of Public Works and Services has the responsibility for ensuring that the mandatory requirements related to Government electricity purchasing are satisfied by relevant agencies.
1997–98 Government Departments below took 5 per cent or more Green Power:
Department of Education
Attorney General’s
Department of Corrective Services
Department of Community Services
Department of Housing
Department of Fair Trading
Department of Mineral Resources (with Ministry of Energy and Utilities)
Department of Juvenile Justice
Department of Land and Water Conservation
Environment Protection Authority
Department of Public Works and Services
ICAC
Land Information Centre
NSW Adult Migrant Centre
NSW Agriculture
NSW Cancer Council
NSW Crime Commission (85%)
NSW Sport and Recreation
NSW Fire Brigades
NSW Health Department
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service
Office of State Revenue
Office of Marine Administration
Olympic Coordination Authority (25%)
NSW Parliament House
Roads and Traffic Authority
Royal Botanic Gardens
Skin Cancer Foundation
State Forests (25%)
State Transit Authority
TAFE
Waste Water Authority
WorkCover Authority
1999 Government Departments below took 6% or more Green Power:
Attorney General’s
Department of Corrective Services
Department of Education and Training
Department of Housing
Department of Public Works and Services (10%)
Department of Sport and Recreation
Department of Transport
Environmental Protection Authority (25%)
ICAC (10%)
Land Information Centre
Land Titles Office
Department of Mineral Resources (with Ministry of Energy and Utilities)
NSW Agriculture
NSW Cancer Council
NSW Crime Commission (100%)
Department of Industrial Relations
NSW Fire Brigades
NSW Fisheries
NSW Health Department
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service
NSW Police
Rural Fire Service
Board of Studies
Olympic Coordination Authority (25%)
NSW Parliament House
Royal Botanic Gardens
NSW State Property (DPWS)
Ministry for the Arts
 [NSW Library]
 [Art Gallery of NSW]
Waste Recycling—Processing Service of NSW
Department of Community Services
WorkCover Authority
State Forests (25%)
State Records of NSW
(2) As noted in (1) there is no requirement outside the Department of Public Works and Services organised contracts, which are only mandatory for contestable sites for Schedule 1 agencies, for Government departments to purchase 6 per cent Green Power.
(3) (a) and (b) As stated in (1) there is no requirement outside the Department of Public Works and Services organised contracts, which are only mandatory for contestable sites for Schedule 1 agencies, for Government departments to purchase 6% Green Power.
However, with respect to off-budget agencies within my portfolio, a number have already reported Green Power purchases through the Government Energy Management Policy energy use reporting framework. Information will also be provided in submissions made to the currently underway Legislative Assembly Standing Committee on Public Works’ Inquiry Into NSW Government Energy Consumption Targets.

368 KANGAROO TAGS—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—
(1) How many kangaroo tags have been issued by NPWS in:
(a) 1995?
(b) 1996?
(c) 1997?
(d) 1998?
(e) 1999?
(2) In each of the above years, what was the:
(a) cost per tag?
(b) revenue from tags?
(3) How much has been spent on kangaroo-related research projects in each of the above years?
(4) How much revenue in the above years went into consolidated revenue?
(5) Has any revenue been spent on kangaroo fencing of parks such as Kinchega to protect farmlands from kangaroo incursions?

Answer—

(1) (a) 1995 1,481,468
(b) 1996 1,364,927
(c) 1997 986,151
(d) 1998 1,024,471
(e) 1999 approximately 1,000,000 to date
(2) (a) Tags cost 60 cents each.
(b) Not all tags issued are used. Tags are often returned and refunded. The revenue from tags is closely linked to the actual kangaroo cull, rather than the total issued. Therefore, the estimated revenue from tags is as follows:
1995 $592,425
1996 $695,314
1997 $538,762
1998 $564,473
1999 $513,000 (progressive).
(3) (a) 1995 approximately $64,000
(b) 1996 less than $64,000
(c) 1997 approximately $90,000
(d) 1998 approximately $167,430
(e) 1999 approximately $90,000 (progressive).
(4) The NPWS retains all revenue raised. None is returned to consolidated revenue.
(5) The NPWS spends significant funds on the fencing of national parks and nature reserves each year, including Kinchega National Park. Fences are constructed to stock-proof standard only, which allows the movement of native wildlife. Fences which have previously been constructed to restrict the movement of marsupials have been shown not to work. Kangaroos regularly break through such fences.

369 MID NORTH COAST AREA HEALTH SERVICE AND MANNING BASE HOSPITAL—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) Were complaints received from the former Director of Nursing at Manning Base Hospital concerning the Board of the Mid North Coast Area Health Service and the administration of Manning Base Hospital?
(2) If so, what occurred to investigate such complaints?
(3) If an investigation occurred, who carried out the investigation?
(4) When was the investigation carried out?
(5) Who was interviewed during the investigation?
(6) Was a report prepared?
(7) If so, who received a copy of the report?
(8) Did the complainant receive a copy of the report?
(9) If not, why not?
(10) What action or actions have been taken as a result of any investigation that may have occurred?
(11) If action has occurred, who undertook such action?


Answer—

(1) to (11) Officers from the Department of Health’s Audit Branch investigated the complaint. The complainant was notified of the outcome of the investigation.

370 ROADS PROJECTS EXPENDITURE—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

(1) What was the final expenditure for roads projects in each State electorate in 1998-99 (broken into maintenance expenditure and construction expenditure)?
(2) What was the breakdown of Federal and State funds spent on roads in each State electorate in 1998-99?
(3)
Answer—

Electorate	Development $	Maintenance $	RS and TM $
ALBURY	13,507,700.50	9,010,948.00	1,262,333.62
AUBURN	10,036,415.42	4,169,739.38	2,166,494.46
BALLINA	22,480,409.90	3,131,113.34	593,722.60
BANKSTOWN	10,163,241.71	2,005,406.15	625,870.78
BARWON	4,847,065.53	69,255,532.11	3,038,671.27
BATHURST	10,078,726.98	17,472,522.88	3,729,209.20
BAULKHAM HILLS	3,414,143.02	793,119.08	841,336.26
BEGA	2,952,931.04	8,631,248.19	1,489,950.05
BLACKTOWN	175,311.13	1,947,095.59	933,379.38
BLIGH	3,471,021.05	1,697,848.64	4,970,467.41
BLUE MOUNTAINS	18,281,925.83	4,021,326.39	1,683,684.35
BURRINJUCK	43,861,377.61	25,077,418.43	4,158,157.92
CABRAMATTA	6,737,788.00	561,226.19	622,148.30
CAMDEN	276,541.37	6,284,764.80	3,115,714.11
CAMPBELLTOWN	3,794,193.00	2,689,960.99	3,197,044.67
CANTERBURY	7,079,608.77	402,316.66	2,181,660.41
CESSNOCK	10,723,069.69	8,496,565.84	1,019,637.33
CHARLESTOWN	9,700,273.98	754,946.08	1,535,960.53
CLARENCE	10,641,963.42	17,046,841.45	2,486,655.97
COFFS HARBOUR	26,257,090.57	4,348,949.21	1,246,721.22
COOGEE	640,834.27	481,111.98	598,430.32
CRONULLA	288,393.99	910,883.06	409,821.55
DAVIDSON	335,687.97	918,249.16	1,226,706.82
DRUMMOYNE	5,580,865.25	1,905,298.46	1,663,962.66
DUBBO	282,036.83	21,266,135.58	5,557,752.40
EAST HILLS	465,412.14	1,932,898.15	768,857.78
EPPING	1,019,944.75	1,287,450.23	807,618.55
FAIRFIELD	12,067,619.97	941,653.40	632,719.54
GEORGES RIVER	16,527,390.51	1,838,459.86	861,043.05
GOSFORD	703,095.95	1,237,568.45	1,374,573.59
GRANVILLE	1,367,300.62	830,377.52	7,923,585.81
HAWKESBURY	529,250.77	10,356,869.67	2,468,435.13
HEATHCOTE	5,917,129.98	3,892,210.39	1,518,872.99
HEFFRON	34,451,103.22	3,012,534.82	2,373,867.84
HORNSBY	268,798.54	8,086,517.14	4,508,378.85
ILLAWARRA	200,265.09	2,007,290.52	706,669.74
KEIRA	8,358,971.62	4,748,794.67	1,668,388.16
KIAMA	8,372,960.78	2,691,869.41	1,411,758.57
KOGARAH	7,011,265.57	1,418,900.64	867,706.15
KU-RING-GAI	210,853.14	1,300,444.24	957,006.60
LACHLAN	1,408,625.59	17,786,941.05	1,609,314.59
LAKE MACQUARIE	509,001.24	3,450,933.93	1,444,687.53
LAKEMBA	28,815,193.83	992,801.11	729,228.40
LANE COVE	889,152.77	1,460,892.06	3,678,604.01
LISMORE	3,353,053.74	8,270,760.77	1,185,978.99
LIVERPOOL	2,751,571.07	806,195.66	1,088,978.99
LONDONDERRY	1,229,171.67	1,839,708.02	1,672,476.80
MACQUARIE FIELDS	5,190,139.58	3,021,808.47	2,537,687.26
MAITLAND	241,941.25	6,161,806.76	1,667,744.68
MANLY	215,557.34	972,464.81	1,900,338.80
MAROUBRA	215,178.54	1,065,204.07	805,798.72
MARRICKVILLE	509,190.56	864,747.83	1,575,445.25
MENAI	8,087,555.89	1,637,270.43	856,101.35
MIRANDA	217,919.79	625,813.28	419,089.62
MONARO	13,180,917.83	15,766,253.10	2,702,250.56
MOUNT DRUITT	7,630,079.20	2,771,953.70	868,312.40
MULGOA	10,350,204.97	2,913,113.74	1,469,144.83
MURRAY-DARLING	6,216,440.88	39,542,770.29	4,335,040.91
MURRUMBIDGEE	795,489.00	24,288,872.62	2,514,331.68
MYALL LAKES	68,219,649.57	10,464,935.67	1,618,955.66
NEWCASTLE	281,176.47	1,444,021.60	1,059,129.57
NORTH SHORE	241,829.28	11,485,269.16	2,101,038.48
NORTHERN TABLELANDS	287,398.73	21,206,241.13	2,523,419.56
ORANGE	450,872.18	20,329,787.63	1,820,438.16
OXLEY	13,754,432.58	15,284,287.33	1,922,890.37
PARRAMATTA	5,838,415.95	1,806,137.08	2,938,395.19
PEATS	1,593,176.14	7,033,744.71	2,578,811.61
PENRITH	10,475,150.69	1,475,137.93	1,752,812.72
PITTWATER	511,002.47	2,635,193.12	2,079,243.73
PORT JACKSON	14,814,547.03	6,401,162.28	8,078,143.65
PORT MACQUARIE	6,498,607.98	4,802,301.55	876,162.11
PORT STEPHENS	47,433,782.26	4,422,549.38	1,568,495.30
RIVERSTONE	3,979,687.60	1,065,997.75	1,494,681.06
ROCKDALE	54,299,409.78	2,357,911.89	1,015,627.29
RYDE	7,620,738.84	1,075,415.29	2,318,713.78
SMITHFIELD	15,747,784.63	913,057.76	1,016,270.89
SOUTH COAST	402,702.07	3,684,613.91	1,805,575.09
SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS	123,170.84	9,373,550.21	1,841,016.52
STRATHFIELD	1,634,406.65	1,183,856.38	1,383,993.42
SWANSEA	2,231.15	1,266,217.08	1,026,432.19
TAMWORTH	2,934,587.04	11,164,746.88	1,581,712.69
THE ENTRANCE	1,765,768.13	1,496,520.35	1,463,003.07
THE HILLS	727,654.51	665,612.64	1,377,105.89
TWEED	4,976,131.31	2,685,307.06	1,434,234.02
UPPER HUNTER	1,418,892.71	27,488,027.00	3,822,704.77
VAUCLUSE	215,178.54	791,089.90	465,034.46
WAGGA WAGGA	2,091,412.62	9,948,953.19	1,362,249.40
WAKEHURST	300,217.73	1,083,434.66	602,577.05
WALLSEND	10,615,197.77	1,508,424.64	1,114,897.15
WENTWORTHVILLE	680,972.42	928,631.45	1,139,953.85
WILLOUGHBY	243,009.76	1,034,239.53	1,329,238.18
WOLLONGONG	7,823,661.81	3,664,822.39	1,189,425.94
WYONG	586,958.90	4,475,654.24	2,231,859.48


(2)

Electorate	State $	Federal $
ALBURY	11,133,424.22	12,647,557.90
AUBURN	16,372,649.26	0.00
BALLINA	18,895,048.39	7,310,197.45
BANKSTOWN	12,781,018.64	13,500.00
BARWON	56,673,677.08	20,467,591.83
BATHURST	29,969,899.96	1,310,559.10
BAULKHAM HILLS	4,807,639.27	240,959.09
BEGA	12,936,067.46	138,061.82
BLACKTOWN	2,906,366.25	149,419.85
BLIGH	10,139,337.10	0.00
BLUE MOUNTAINS	23,986,936.57	0.00
BURRINJUCK	25,469,620.28	47,627,333.68
CABRAMATTA	7,693,850.91	227,311.58
CAMDEN	7,408,182.98	2,268,837.30
CAMPBELLTOWN	7,654,548.08	2,026,650.58
CANTERBURY	9,153,117.10	510,468.74
CESSNOCK	7,343,518.43	12,895,754.43
CHARLESTOWN	11,988,370.61	2,809.98
CLARENCE	28,706,350.07	1,469,110.77
COFFS HARBOUR	23,002,828.02	8,849,932.98
COOGEE	1,714,178.38	6,198.19
CRONULLA	1,609,098.60	0.00
DAVIDSON	2,480,643.95	0.00
DRUMMOYNE	9,150,126.37	0.00
DUBBO	15,905,732.71	11,200,192.10
EAST HILLS	3,167,168.07	0.00
EPPING	2,334,207.16	780,806.37
FAIRFIELD	13,154,377.57	487,615.34
GEORGES RIVER	19,226,893.42	0.00
GOSFORD	3,260,604.54	54,633.45
GRANVILLE	9,809,368.60	311,895.35
HAWKESBURY	13,162,952.57	191,603.00
HEATHCOTE	11,313,558.67	14,654.69
HEFFRON	39,823,208.28	14,297.60
HORNSBY	3,069,270.58	9,794,423.95
ILLAWARRA	2,875, 691.37	38,533.98
KEIRA	14,574,044.45	202,110.00
KIAMA	12,458,322.77	18,265.99
KOGARAH	9,278,805.62	19,066.74
KU-RING-GAI	2,397,933.27	70,370.71
LACHLAN	15,064,543.18	5,740,338.05
LAKE MACQUARIE	4,382,243.06	1,022,379.64
LAKEMBA	30,401,265.49	135,957.85
LANE COVE	5,926,575.61	102,073.23
LISMORE	12,044,555.44	764,983.00
LIVERPOOL	3,196,058.63	1,450,687.09
LONDONDERRY	4,366,826.69	374,529.80
MACQUARIE FIELDS	8,140,756.68	2,608,878.63
MAITLAND	6,694,592.08	1,376,900.61
MANLY	3,088,360.95	0.00
MAROUBRA	1,983,852.79	102,328.54
MARRICKVILLE	2,939,758.61	9,625.03
MENAI	10,580,927.67	0.00
MIRANDA	1,248,168.00	14,654.69
MONARO	23,072,724.82	8,576,696.67
MOUNT DRUITT	9,619,867.75	1,650,477.55
MULGOA	14,319,476.91	412,986.63
MURRAY-DARLING	41,494,246.16	8,600,005.92
MURRUMBIDGEE	11,374,213.74	16,224,479.56
MYALL LAKES	56,351,065.28	23,952,475.62
NEWCASTLE	2,435,281.72	349,045.92
NORTH SHORE	13,777,629.92	50,507.00
NORTHERN TABLELANDS	12,612,016.83	11,405,042.59
ORANGE	22,318,407.47	282,690.50
OXLEY	24,259,055.50	6,702,554.78
PARRAMATTA	9,521,560.08	1,061,388.14
PEATS	4,254,630.67	6,951,101.79
PENRITH	13,188,131.44	514,969.90
PITTWATER	5,115,439.32	110,000.00
PORT JACKSON	29,246,266.65	47,586.31
PORT MACQUARIE	11,464,553.76	712,517.88
PORT STEPHENS	46,608,671.72	6,816 155.22
RIVERSTONE	5,441,181.38	1,099,185.03
ROCKDALE	57,592,948.96	80,000.00
RYDE	10,999,806.13	15,061.78
SMITHFIELD	14,207,683.36	3,469,429.92
SOUTH COAST	5,884,011.07	8,880.00
SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS	7,019,175.39	4,318,562.18
STRATHFIELD	4,197,261.45	0.00
SWANSEA	1,978,177.76	316,702.66
TAMWORTH	12,280,807.54	3,400,239.07
THE ENTRANCE	4,602,145.06	123,146.49
THE HILLS	2,702,841.87	67,531.17
TWEED	5,994,070.99	3,101,601.40
UPPER HUNTER	21,967,360.07	10,762,264.41
VAUCLUSE	1,471,302.90	0.00
WAGGA WAGGA	9,151,162.10	4,251,453.11
WAKEHURST	1,986,229.44	0.00
WALLSEND	3,243,264.95	9,995,254.61
WENTWORTHVILLE	2,389,534.42	360,023.30
WILLOUGHBY	2,574,006.87	32,480.60
WOLLONGONG	12,310,636.14	367,274.00
WYONG	5,621,941.75	1,672,530.87

371 BOORI HOUSE YOUTH REFUGE—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—
(1) Has Boori House Youth Refuge in Taree closed?
(2) If so, was it a result of inadequate funding from the department to the auspicing body?
(3) Have there been meetings where this insufficient funding has been canvassed with members of DOCS staff?
(4) If so, when?
(5) If so, what was the result of such meetings occurring?
(6) If so, if additional funding was not forthcoming as a result of those meetings, why not?
(7) What does the Government intend to do in relation to accommodation and support services for young people from the Gloucester, Greater Taree and Great Lakes Local Government areas that were previously serviced by Boori House?
(8) Has the Mid North Coast office of DOCS publicly announced that the refuge would reopen in 3 months?
(9) If so, is this an accurate period of time for the service to reopen?
(10) If so, how would the service be auspiced?
(11) If so, what has been done to date in finding an auspicing body for it to reopen?
(12) If so, will the Government ensure that sufficient funds are made available for it to be properly run?
(13) Have the premises which housed the refuge now been let to a family?
(14) If so, on what basis?
(15) How can her department assert that the department will reopen when it has been leased to the family?
(16) Did the former auspicing body offer to keep Boori House open until somebody else was auspiced to take over the running of Boori House?
(17) If so, what was the response from her department to that offer?
(18) Why was Boori House allowed to close before her department found another auspicing body?
(19) What will be the position of the former workers of Boori House should any new auspicing body be appointed?
(20) If workers are picked up by any new auspicing body, will they lose status?
(21) If so, why?

Answer—

(1) Yes, Boori House Youth Refuge in Taree closed on 1 October 1999.
(2) No, the service closed at the request of the auspicing body who requested that the funding be returned to the Department because they could no longer manage two large services.
(3) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
(6) Not applicable.
(7) A new auspice organisation has been sought to provide this service. In the short term, two part-time youth housing workers have provided accommodation support to homeless young people in Taree in addition to the service already provided in Great Lakes.
(8) Mid North Coast Area office staff of DOCS stated publicly that the refuge would not reopen before 1 January 2000.
(9) The new service will be funded from 1 January 2000.
(10) and (11) An Expression of Interest was advertised in October for organisations interested in providing this service. Several applications were received and the successful organisation will be announced shortly. A selection panel including local community representation will recommend the new auspice on 10 December 1999.
(12) Recurrent funds of in excess of $287,000 annually are available for supported accommodation for homeless young people in the three local government areas.
(13) and (14) The refuge premises are still leased by Manning District Emergency Accommodation from the Office of Community Housing until the new auspice is selected. MDEA has utilised the premises for short-term emergency accommodation for families. I am informed the premises are currently vacant.
(15) Any subletting has been on the understanding that the premises had to be available for the new auspice as of 1 January.
(16) The department originally requested the former auspicing body to keep the youth refuge open until a new auspice was found.
(17) and (18) The Department understands that legal advice to the former organisation was that they should close the service before returning the funding. The process for finding a new auspice for this amount of public funds entails an open selection process which takes time.
(19) The employment of staff for the new organisation is the business of that organisation. Equal employment opportunity practices are a condition of funding in all funded services.
(20) and (21) This is an issue outside the scope of my department.
372 FARM DAM POLICY—Mr Webb to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—
(1) (a) Does he concede that the “10% of catchment farm dam policy” discriminates against graziers in the Snowy/Genoa catchment area?
(b) Does he also concede that many Monaro graziers in lower rainfall areas will have insufficient water for stock and domestic purposes during drier times?
(c) Could he indicate what procedures are in place for graziers on the Monaro, who wish to harvest more than the harvestable rights, in endeavouring to diversify and develop their properties?
(2) Could he explain what mechanisms are in place for local governments to vary native vegetation and farm dams policies when considering development applications, particularly with reference to small area rural residential subdivisions?

Answer—

(1) (a) and (b) No. The new farm dams policy allows all land holders to capture a minimum 10 per cent of the average regional rainfall run-off from their property for use for any purpose without a licence. The statewide 10 per cent figure was chosen as a reasonable basis for providing for the basic farming needs of land holders through dry periods without significantly impacting on the needs of water users and the environment downstream. It is designed to provide for domestic and stock needs and some limited irrigation. As the harvestable right varies with regional rainfall, no farmer group is discriminated against. A Farm Dams Assessment Guide was released in August to assist land holders in determining their allowable storage capacity under the policy.
(c) Land holders in the Monaro area who require a larger farm dam than that available under the policy can apply for a licence.
(2) Councils are encouraged to contact their regional Department of Land and Water Conservation office to discuss the water supply options available for proposed small area rural residential subdivisions. The department can provide advice on the most appropriate water supply options to meet the needs of a particular development.
Councils can contribute to the development of vegetation management plans through membership on regional vegetation management committees. This is designed to ensure input and clear parameters early in the planning process rather than at the time development applications are submitted. In addition, there is a general provision within the Native Vegetation Conservation Act 1997 whereby land within a nominated local government area can be excluded from the operation of the Act where adequate provision has been made for the conservation and management of native vegetation through the operation of a local environmental plan.

25 NOVEMBER 1999

(Paper No. 24 continued)

373 RECOVERY OF STOLEN CATTLE—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Police—

What progress has been made in recovering 90 head of cattle stolen on 3 or 4 May 1999 from the property Warangala, Forbes 2871, owned by Margaret and Robert Hart?

Answer—

The Commander, Southern Rivers Region, has advised that extensive inquiries have, to date, met with a negative result. However, police are still pursuing some leads in relation to this investigation.
As a result of this investigation, Operation Nicaragua was formed to target cattle theft in New South Wales.

374 CASINO SURVEILLANCE DIVISION—INVESTIGATION—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Gaming and Racing and Minister Assisting the Premier on Hunter Development—
(1) Did the Casino Surveillance Division of the Department of Gaming and Racing investigate allegations made by the Sydney Harbour Casino against the integrity of an employee, Mr John St Vincent Welch?
(2) Was that investigation conducted by the Casino Surveillance Division between December 1995 and mid-1996?
(3) Was a Sydney Harbour Casino internal audit report the basis for the investigation conducted by the Casino Surveillance Division?
(4) Was the Casino Surveillance Division aware that during the course of its investigation, Sydney Harbour Casino terminated Mr St Vincent Welch’s employment?
(5) Did the Casino Surveillance Division continue the investigation after the termination of Mr St Vincent Welch’s services on or from 13 February 1996?
(6) During the course of the investigation, did the Casino Surveillance Division become aware that the Sydney Harbour Casino was in possession of legal opinion which challenged the validity of the internal audit report?
(7) If the Casino Surveillance Division was aware of the existence of legal opinion which challenged the validity of the internal audit report, from whom did the opinion emanate?
Answer—(1) Yes.
(2) Yes.
(3) The Casino Surveillance Division was conducting an investigation into Mr St Vincent Welch’s application for a casino employee’s licence as required by section 50 of the Casino Control Act.
(4) Yes.
(5) Yes.
(6) I am not aware.
(7) See (6)
375 CONSTRUCTION FAULTS RECTIFICATION—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Fair Trading and Minister for Sport and Recreation—

What progress is being made to rectify construction faults identified in a house situated at Lot 2 Jimmy Noonan Close, Young, owned by Mr and Mrs Schiller, Box 86, Young 2594?

Answer—

I am advised that a building insurance claim lodged by Mr and Mrs Schiller with the Department of Fair Trading was declined on 28 July 1999 as it was lodged out of time by some 3 years under the department’s Comprehensive Insurance Scheme.
I understand Mr and Mrs Schiller subsequently lodged an appeal against the department’s decision with the Fair Trading Tribunal on 11 August 1999. As the matter is still before the tribunal, it would be inappropriate for me to comment further at this time.

376 DISEASED CATTLE—Mr George to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—
(1) Why was the Centurion Murray Grey Beef Cattle Stud which had a TN2 status informed of a diseased animal immediately after the diagnosis was made when it allegedly came from their property?
(2) Why were they not given the opportunity to identify that it was a cow that they sold?
(3) Why were they not invited to have their vet present when the cow was destroyed?
(4) Why was the purchaser of the cow allowed to show his cattle if there was a problem in his herd?

Answer—

(1) Because of the type of organism involved and the tests required, it can take some months to determine whether an animal is definitely infected with bovine Johnes disease.
(2) Meticulous checking procedures are in place to ensure that any infected animal is traced accurately to its herd of origin. Infection may not be confirmed until after an animal is slaughtered.
(3) It is normal procedure for an official veterinarian to undertake the investigation, rather than a private veterinarian, because the disease is notifiable under State legislation.
(4) Hygiene at shows is generally very good and helps stop the spread of disease. Until disease is confirmed, all possible attempts are made to balance restrictions on properties, in terms of quarantine, with the possibility of risk to other herds.
377 ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL—COMPLAINTS—Mr Hazzard to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

What is the name of each Aboriginal Land Council in New South Wales that he or his department has received a complaint about (and referred on to ICAC or other statutory review body or the NSW Aboriginal Land Council) in the years:
(a) 1995-96?
(b) 1996-97?
(c) 1997-98?
(d) 1998-99?
Answer—
(a) to (d) Complaints may be referred to the NSW Aboriginal Land Council or where appropriate the ICAC or the Ombudsman. I refer the honourable member to the relevant annual reports for each year.
378 PUBLIC HOUSING WAITING LISTS—Mr Hazzard to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

What number of families/individuals were waiting for public housing in New South Wales as at annual intervals between 1995 and 1999 (please specify the numbers in each Department of Housing region within New South Wales)?
Answer—

Refer to the Department of Housing’s annual reports for statistics.

379 HOME DETENTION—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—
(1) What was the total number of persons given home detention in each of:
(a) 1996?
(b) 1997?
(c) 1998?
(d) 1999?
(2) Of those in each year:
(a) How many were charged with a criminal offence as a result of alleged activity whilst on home detention?
(b) How many were removed from home detention?
Answer—
(1) (a) Nil. The Home Detention Act 1996 commenced on 21 February 1997.
(b) 157.
(c) 352.
(d) Complete figures for the 1999 calendar year will not be available until mid-January 2000. However, for the period to November 1999, some 301 persons were given home detention.
(2) (a) 1 in 1997, 15 in 1998. As indicated above, complete figures for 1999 will not be available until January 2000. However, during the period to November 1999, 19 persons were charged.
(b) 28 in 1997, 66 in 1998. For the period to November 1999, 70 home detention orders were revoked.
380 POLICE ACADEMY—GOULBURN—Ms Hodgkinson to the Minister for Police—
(1) Will the Police Academy at Goulburn be open during the period in which the Olympics will be held in 2000?
(2) How many instructors from the Police Academy in Goulburn will be on duty at the Games?
(3) What positions, in relation to (2) above, will they hold?

Answer—

(1) Yes.
(2) and (3) I am advised by the Principal, Education Services, NSW Police Academy, that the arrangements for the deployment of available police to the Olympics will result in minimal departure from normal Service commitments.
381 OUTSTANDING CORRESPONDENCE—Mr Humpherson to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) When will he answer correspondence from me, regarding bus timetables, dated 11 March 1999 on behalf of my constituent Paul Mahoney?
(2) Did he receive ten reminders sent on the following dates: 13 April 1999, 7 May 1999, 31 April 1999, 23 June 1999, 15 July 1999, 11 August 1999, 1 September 1999, 21 September 1999, 18 October 1999 and 22 November 1999?
(3) When will he reply to the outstanding correspondence?

Answer—

(1) to (3) A response has been forwarded to your office.
382 PROPOSED McDONALDS RESTAURANT—MOORE PARK—Ms Moore to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

Concerning the proposal to construct a McDonalds restaurant on Moore Park—
(1) Is there any document or other evidence of an agreement between Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust and McDonalds in respect of the establishment of a McDonalds restaurant at the corner of Lang Road and Anzac Parade, Moore Park?
(2) If so, what are the names of the parties to the agreement, when was it signed and what are its terms?
(3) If there is no document or evidence of any agreement between Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust and McDonalds, is there any other agreement or evidence of any agreement between Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust with any other person about the development of a restaurant at the corner of Lang Road and Anzac Road, Moore Park?
(4) If so, who are the parties to the agreement, when was the agreement signed and what are its terms?
(5) Is there any evidence known to the trust of any contract between McDonalds and the persons with whom the trust has contracted about the development of a McDonalds restaurant at the corner of Lang Road and Anzac Parade, Moore Park?
(6) If so, when did the trust learn of the contract, what information did the trust receive in relation to that contract and from whom did the trust receive that information?

Answer—

I am advised by the Premier’s Department of the following answers:
(1) No.
(2) Not applicable.
(3) Yes.
(4) The parties to the agreement are Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust, Newks Marketing Pty Ltd, and Game Plan, Sports & Leisure Pty Ltd. The agreement was signed on 20 January 1995. The trust has recently commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales in relation to the agreement. The trust is therefore unable to comment further on this matter.
(5) No.
(6) Not applicable.
383 PROPOSED McDONALDS RESTAURANT—MOORE PARK—Ms Moore to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

In relation to the contract which the Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust has entered into about the development of a McDonalds restaurant at the corner of Lang Road and Anzac Parade, Moore Park—
(1) Does the contract have a finite period in which the restaurant must be developed?
(2) If so, what is the period?
(3) Does that contract have any preconditions about the trust’s consent to a development application for the establishment of a McDonalds restaurant?
(4) If so, what are the precise terms of the preconditions?
(5) Do any of the terms of the contract which the trust has entered into require it to consent to any other restaurant if the McDonalds restaurant is not constructed?
(6) If so, what are the precise terms of that consent?
Answer—

I am advised by the Premier’s Department of the following answer:
(1) to (6) The terms of the agreement are currently the subject of proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The trust is therefore unable to comment further on this matter.
384 FOX STUDIO AND ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX—Ms Moore to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—

Concerning the regulatory regime covering the Fox studio and entertainment complex—
(1) Do the consent conditions allow the use of the “Fodder Shed” (approved under Fox DA No. 12 for a craft shop and storage) as a rehearsal studio with the doors open, which my constituents have reported has occurred?
(2) Do the consent conditions allow private vehicles and public buses to exit east onto Lang Road after 10.00 pm, as my constituents report is occurring, and which appears to be permitted by the green left turn arrow at the exit to the Fox complex?
(3) Do the consent conditions permit the extremely loud fireworks which occurred during the Fox opening on Sunday 7 November 1999 and which residents report as the loudest noises they have ever heard in a residential area?
(4) Do the consent conditions for Fox Studios permit the amplified music which continued intermittently until 12.15 am during the Fox opening and which residents report as louder than previous concerts held in the vicinity?
(5) What action has been taken by government authorities concerning the above problems?
(6) Is he aware that the Fox “community access phone line” on 1800 630 138 is answered by a message service during the night, when the most intrusive problems occur, and residents get no response in time to halt the problem activities?
(7) What external independent regulatory bodies monitor and have responsibility for enforcing Fox’s compliance with consent conditions?
(8) What powers do local authorities (such as police, council and the EPA) have to halt activities causing problems until the matter can be investigated?
(9) What sanctions can be imposed on Fox Studios by any government authority if there is evidence of a breach of the consent conditions?
(10) How does the current regulatory regime provide effective protection for residents?

Answer—

(1) No, the consent conditions do not allow for the Fodder Shed to be used as a rehearsal studio.
(2) The conditions of consent restrict drivers from turning left onto Lang Road after 10.00 pm.
(3) Fireworks are allowed at the Fox Studios site provided they comply with the Outdoor Filming and Outdoor Events Management Strategies for the site.
(4) Music played at the site must comply with the maximum noise planning levels for the site imposed by conditions of consent.
(5) The Department of Urban Affairs and Planning has contacted Fox Studios to discuss issues raised by residents and to ensure compliance with the conditions of consent.
(6) The community access telephone line is manned 24 hours per day. At times, due to technical difficulties, people have been required to leave messages on an answering machine. Fox Studios has sought to return calls in the shortest time possible.
(7) I am the consent authority for the site and the Department of Urban Affairs and Planning carries out these functions on my behalf.
(8) Police, council and the EPA have powers to abate offensive noise under the Noise Control Act. Councils are empowered to abate public nuisances under the Local Government Act.
(9) Where there is evidence of a serious ongoing breach of development consent, and providing the breach cannot be addressed through any other means, the Government may choose to issue an order or take legal action to remedy or restrain the breach. To date, the Government is not aware of any such breaches.
(10) Fox Studios has provided a 24-hour telephone contact line to receive complaints from the general public. Fox Studios is required to address all complaints where they can be substantiated and mitigate against the recurrence of any problems. The Department of Urban Affairs and Planning follows up on every complaint that is directed to the department and works to ensure that valid resident concerns are addressed.
385 WOOLLOOMOOLOO FERRY SERVICE TRIAL—Ms Moore to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

Concerning the promised trial of a ferry service to Woolloomooloo, announced during the 1999 election campaign—
(1) At the time he gave the commitment to trial a ferry service to Woolloomooloo Bay, to have started in mid-1999, what advice or permission had he sought about the availability of a suitable berthing wharf?
(2) At the time he gave the commitment to trial a ferry service to Woolloomooloo Bay, what advice had he received about the availability of a suitable berthing wharf?
(3) What are the nature and terms of the title provided to the developers and the private owners of the Finger Wharf and Wharf 11 at Woolloomooloo Bay?
(4) How much of the redevelopment site at Woolloomooloo Bay has been alienated from public ownership and control?
(5) What form of ownership and control over the site does the Government retain, either directly or via a government authority such as the Maritime Services Board?
(6) What further action is being undertaken by the Government to ensure the availability of a suitable ferry berthing facility at Woolloomooloo Bay?

Answer—

(1) and (2) State Transit was requested to investigate suitable wharves concurrent with the planning of the trial.
(3) The developer at Woolloomooloo has entered into an agreement to lease to enable the development of the project to proceed. On completion, 99-year leases will be granted to each of the purchasers of the residential, hotel and retail components of the project. The residential leases will be granted under strata leasehold legislation. The provision of a ferry service requires the consent of the body corporate, which has repeatedly indicated it will not give consent for a ferry service.
(4) Prior to the redevelopment of the Finger Wharf and Wharf 11, there was no public access to the area as it was part of the operating port. On completion the public will have, for the first time since the wharf was completed in 1915, access to the Finger Wharf western apron, the viewing platform at the outer end of the wharf, the boardwalk adjacent to Cowper Wharf Road and public areas within the hotel. In addition, the public has had access to the extensive promenade and rooftop area of Wharf 11 since its completion in September 1998. With regard to ownership, the whole area remains in public ownership. However, the control rests with the body corporate under the leases.
(5) The successor to the Maritime Services Board, the Marine Ministerial Holding Corporation (MMHC) is the owner of both the Finger Wharf and Wharf 11 and is the lessor of the wharves. During the term of the 99-year lease the MMHC ensures that the wharves are maintained in good order. The Government retains planning control over the site should there be any future changes proposed for the wharves.
(6) Should demonstrated demand for a service be outlined, which could sustain a commercially viable operation, then the Government would further consider such an option. To date, research undertaken by State Transit has shown that Woolloomooloo is well served by Route 311 bus services to the City and Kings Cross as well as the Eastern Suburbs railway line.
However, it must be noted that the provision of permanent commuter services with berthing facilities requires the consent of the Woolloomooloo Finger Wharf Body Corporate and thus far they have indicated an unwillingness to do so.
386 MANNING RIVER STUDIES—Mr Oakeshott to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs representing the Minister for Mineral Resources and Minister for Fisheries—
(1) Are there any current studies being carried out as to fish stock and sustainability of the fishing industry in the Manning River by the Department of Fisheries?
(2) If so, what are those studies?
(3) If so, when did they commence?
(4) If so, when is it expected the studies will be completed?
(5) If so, who has done the studies?
(6) Have any studies in the same area been carried out in the last 5 years?
(7) If so, what has been the result of such studies?
(8) What has the Government done to undertake fish stocks and regulate the fishing industry in the Manning River?
(9) Are there any sources or programs available to identify or possibly quantify the problems of fish stocks in the Manning River?
(10) What is the average level of income for commercial fishers who fish primarily in the Manning River?
(11) What other developments are occurring within the State Government to address problems in the fishing industry that may assist and have an impact on the fish stocks in the Manning River and elsewhere?

Answer—

(1) Research programs are being conducted throughout New South Wales to monitor the sustainability of fishery resources in the State.
(2) My department, NSW Fisheries, has a series of research programs currently under way to assist in assessing the sustainability of fishing practices. Because most fish stocks use both estuary and ocean waters in their life cycle, research programs are rarely isolated to a single estuary and are often conducted on a more holistic basis. However, the field work of a project entitled “Development of discard-reducing gears and practices in the estuary prawn and haul fisheries in NSW” is nearing completion and the Manning River was one of a number of major survey sites for the study. Other major programs include an assessment of the effects of acid sulphate soils on oysters in the Manning River, stock assessments for major commercial and recreational species and ongoing monitoring of commercial fishing catch and fishing effort. Completed studies, such as the “physical effects of hauling on seagrass beds” also provide valuable information for assessing the impact of fishing on fish stocks and the environment.
(3) Much of the research involves ongoing monitoring and the specific purpose projects commence at various times.
(4) Refer answer (3).
(5) Many of the studies being conducted are undertaken by my department and funded either through core funding or grants provided by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. Other institutions, such as universities, often undertake research which contribute to the existing knowledge base.
(6) No studies specific to the Manning River have been conducted in the last 5 years. However, other habitat-related studies have been undertaken such as the “Utilisation of Restored Wetlands” and the “Harrington Waters Estate Biodiversity Survey of Spring 1998” which involved the Manning River.
(7) The data show a wide range of estuarine species with many of commercial and recreational importance including bream, eels, mullet, flathead and sand whiting.
(8) In addition to the significant habitat protection work being carried out by my department, the activities of commercial and recreational fishers are regulated by limits on the type and amount of fishing gear able to be used and by bag and minimum size limits on many species. Many fishing closures apply specifically in the Manning River to further regulate commercial fishing for both resource management and social conflict purposes. In relation to commercial fishing, this Government introduced a restricted fishery for estuary waters in March 1997 and recently approved the introduction of a zoning scheme for the estuary general fishery. My department is also, in consultation with the Estuary General Management Advisory Committee, developing a management plan for estuary fishing which will define the future management arrangements for commercial fishers operating in this sector.
(9) The ongoing monitoring of catch and effort data is one of the best ways to detect changes in the quantity or abundance of fish harvested. My department is currently conducting a biodiversity survey in New South Wales which will include the Manning River as one of the survey sites. This study may identify or quantify any problems with fish stocks or ecological communities in the estuary. Most other research programs will provide valuable information on a stock basis.
(10) The average catch value for the Manning River for the period 1992-93 to 1997-98 is $522,000 per annum (based on average Sydney Fish Market prices). It should be noted that income received by individual fishers may vary markedly and it is important to note also that most fishers do not confine their activity to a single estuary.
(11) For a comprehensive response to this issue, I would direct Mr Oakeshott to the most recently published NSW Fisheries Annual Report which describes the wide range of programs undertaken by my department.
387 BEROWRA VALLEY LANDCOM STUDY—Mr O’Doherty to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Housing—
(1) When will the ESD study into Berowra Valley Landcom developments be released?
(2) Will the report be released for public consultation before finalisation?
(3) Will he make a commitment to protect Berowra Valley by rezoning Landcom sites for environmental protection?

Answer—

(1) The ESD studies into proposed Crown Land Developments in the Hornsby Local Government Area (LGA) will be released once it has been considered by appropriate government agencies.
(2) The report will be released to the public once it has been considered by appropriate government agencies. The studies were carried out in consultation with members of the local community through workshops and representation on the Mediation Committee.
(3) I am committed to the principles of ESD and to actions that are based on these principles.
388 SECURITY—RAILWAY STATIONS—Mr O’Doherty to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—

For each station in the Hornsby electorate, when will security cameras and other security measures such as long-line public address systems be installed?

Answer—

I am advised by CityRail of the following:
The stations in the Hornsby electorate, namely Thornleigh, Normanhurst, Hornsby, Asquith, Mount Colah, Mount Kuring-gai, Berowra, Cowan, Hawkesbury River and Waitara, are all part of the security upgrade of the 301 stations in the CityRail network which is due for completion by July 2000.

389 INSTITUTIONAL CARE—DEVOLUTION FUNDING—Mr O’Doherty to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—
(1) What is her timetable for the devolution of institutional care for people with intellectual disability?
(2) Does she accept and will she adopt the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission Report which said her 12-year process should be significantly shortened?
(3) When will she release her criteria for assessing priorities for devolution funding?
(4) By what date will the devolution process be commenced and completed?

Answer—

(1) I have given a commitment to implement a devolution plan over a 12-year period. The Community Living Development Unit was established in ADD last year and it has been working through the details of how this plan will evolve. Work has begun with a number of centres in the first half of this year. Families in many instances are excited about the prospect of their son or daughter moving closer to home.
The process of movement of people from large residential centres is a complex one and requires the deep consideration and careful attention of all relevant parties. A number of options will need to be available so that future accommodation can meet all the different needs of residents.
(2) and (3) I have asked the Department of Ageing and Disability to review the situation in all New South Wales institutions and provide information with regard to both timeframes and priorities for future closures by the end of April. I will then be able to provide further information with regard to the continuing devolution program.
(4) The devolution program has been ongoing—with the relocation of the last residents from one centre recently completed. Relocation for another 83 people has begun and further devolution, for centres able to relocate within their current resource base, will also be carried out during the next stage of the program. The timeframe for this process will be influenced by the capacity of local communities to support service providers in a collaborative approach to service provision.
I understand that it is of some concern to the disability sector that the Opposition has declined to set a timeframe for their own devolution policy.
390 PUBLIC TRUSTEE MONIES—Mr Orkopoulos to the Minister for Police representing he Attorney General and Minister for Industrial Relations—
(1) How many people under the age of 18 years have monies held in trust by the Public Trustee?
(2) What is the value of the accounts held in trust?

Answer—

(1) and (2) The Public Trustee acts as trustee for minors where there have been court awards, WorkCover payments and transferred trusts under section 47 of the Trustee Act 1925.
As at 30 November 1999, the total number of trusts for minors was 8,706. The balance of funds held for these beneficiaries in the Public Trust Office Common Fund was $268,890,063.
Of the estates of deceased persons that are managed by the Public Trustee, there are some where a beneficiary of the estate is a minor. These estates are held under the names of the estate and not under the names of the beneficiaries. The number and value of these beneficial interests are not segregated for statistical purposes.
391 PRISONER TRANSPORTING—COSTS—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Police—
(1) How much does it cost the NSW Government, including lost time for escorting officers, to transport prisoners from centres such as Wentworth, Deniliquin and Hay by road to prisons in Albury or Junee?
(2) How much does it cost the State Government, including lost time for escorting officers, to transport juvenile offenders from centres such as Wentworth, Deniliquin and Hay by road to the juvenile detention centre in Wagga Wagga?
(3) Has the NSW Government considered the option of contracting out the transport of prisoners and juvenile offenders to private aircraft charter services rather than by road?
(4) If not, why not?
(5) If the NSW Government has considered contracting out prisoner transport and has decided not to pursue that option, then why not?

Answer—

(1) and (2) Costs will vary in each Local Area Command according to the number of shifts dedicated to prisoner escort.
(3) and (4) Chartered aircraft are used in appropriate circumstances.
(5) The Government has already commenced the transfer of prisoner escort from the Police Service to the Department of Corrective Services.
392 TRAINING COURSES—MULTI-COMBINATION VEHICLE LICENCES—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) What are the names of the three external providers accredited by the Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) delivering training courses for people wishing to obtain licences for Multi-Combination (MC) vehicles?
(2) Where are the courses delivered by the accredited providers being conducted?
(3) Are there any applications currently under consideration by the RTA for more accredited providers to deliver training courses for MC vehicles?
(4) If so, when is it expected a decision will be made as to those applicants’ suitability and where do those applicants propose to conduct the training courses?

Answer—

(1) There are currently four Multi-Combination (MC) driver training and assessment providers who have been accredited by the RTA. They are as follows:
· Driver Education Centre of Australia Ltd (DECA), Quakers Hill and Shepparton.
· National Industrial Skills Training, Wodonga.
· Specialised Transport Training, Revesby.
· Area Training and Assessment Services, Griffith.
(2) Training is delivered at a range of city and country locations. While the decision on the actual delivery location is one for providers to make, providers are generally willing to travel to different locations to deliver the training providing there is sufficient demand for the service.
Where special circumstances exist, the RTA will make arrangements for an MC driving test to be undertaken at a location closer to the applicant’s home.
(3) Applications from three new providers are being processed. A number of other potential providers have also requested information on accreditation requirements.
(4) The three potential new providers are part way through the accreditation process and it is expected that they will be given MC accreditation by early next year. As is the case with current providers, the actual location of training facilities is to be decided by providers.
393 MURRAY VALLEY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—
(1) What subcommittees have been formed as part of the Murray Valley Catchment Management Committee?
(2) Who are the members of those subcommittees?
(3) Has the Government considered purchasing private land for the purposes of returning that land to native vegetation and for the protection of endangered species?

Answer—

(1) Three subcommittees have been formed under the Murray Catchment Management Committee. These subcommittees are known as the Nature Conservation Working Group, the Communications Working Group and the Water Quality Working Group. Members of a fourth subcommittee, to be known as the Dryland Salinity Working Group, are yet to be appointed.
A fifth subcommittee, known as the NSW Murray Wetlands Working Group, reports to both the Murray Catchment Management Committee and the Lower Murray-Darling Catchment Management Committee.
(2) The Nature Conservation Working Group presently comprises Leanne Wheaton, Martin Driver and Judy Frankenburg (of the Murray Catchment Management Committee), Ian Davidson and Louise Bull (of Greening Australia), Bill Currans (Catchment Management Committee Co-ordinator), Catherine Hulme (of Holbrook Landcare), Emmo Willinck (Project Officer for the Upper Billabong Land and Water Management Plan), Paul Scannell (of Albury Botanical Gardens), Evelyn Buckley (community representative), David Leslie (of NSW State Forests), John Brickhill (of National Parks and Wildlife Service) and Mark Sheahan or Kaye Dalton (of the Department of Land and Water Conservation).
The Communications Working Group presently comprises Adrian Wells, Martin Driver, Jenny McLeod, Bill Wells and Les Gordon (of the Murray Catchment Management Committee), Bill Currans (Catchment Management Committee Co-ordinator), Helen Wilson (Landcare Co-ordinator) and Lesley Palmer (Education Facilitator).
The Water Quality Working Group presently comprises Bill Wells, Daryl McGregor, Jenny McLeod, Alicia Howitt, Tim Sheed and Pat Byrnes (of the Murray Catchment Management Committee), Andrew Christie (of Environment Protection Authority), Lesley Palmer (Education Facilitator), Bill Currans (Catchment Management Committee Co-ordinator), and Peter Huhta, Kate Browning, Peter Davies, Tony Dawson and Greg Vinall (of the Department of Land and Water Conservation).
The NSW Murray Wetlands Working Group presently comprises Judy Frankenburg, Adrian Wells, Daryl McGregor and Brian Sharp (of the Murray Catchment Management Committee), Howard Jones, Vin Byrnes and Rosalie Wilson (of the Lower Murray-Darling Catchment Management Committee), Mark Withers (of Darling Anabranch Management Plan Steering Committee), Col Walker (of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Land Council), Ian Davidson (of the Australian Conservation Foundation), Lance Lloyd (Riverine Program Co-ordinator of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission), Peter Adrian (of Department of Urban Affairs and Planning), Judy Chappell (of National Parks and Wildlife Service), Allan Lugg (of NSW Fisheries), David Leslie (of NSW State Forests), Andrew Christie (of Environment Protection Authority), Peter Clark (of Department of Land and Water Conservation) and Merryn Kelly (of the Victorian Department of Natural Resources and Environment).
(3) While no specific purchases of privately owned land have been contemplated to date, the Government is presently considering a number of initiatives aimed at encouraging the conservation of native vegetation on privately owned lands.
394 SHEEPWASH ROAD INTERSECTION—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Transport and Minister for Roads—
(1) Why has the report into the Sheepwash Road intersection not been made public?
(2) When will the recommendations be implemented?
(3) Will he guarantee the intersection will be fully upgraded by Christmas?


Answer—

(1) The report was made available to Wingecarribee Shire Council on 13 December 1999.
(2) Planning has already commenced for the preferred option, which includes upgrading of signposting and channelisation at the intersection and clearing earth embankments on private property to improve sight distance.
Provided that council supports the preferred option, negotiations for land acquisition can commence with affected property owners.
A revised signposting scheme will be introduced early in 2000.
The remaining upgrading works at the intersection are then expected to commence next financial year.
(3) See (2).
395 CANE TOADS—SIGHTINGS—Ms Seaton to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

Where have cane toads been reported in New South Wales since 1995?

Answer—

Cane toads are now permanently established on the North Coast of New South Wales as far south as the Clarence River.
Cane toads are reported occasionally from various locations south of this area. Reports from the Sydney, Central Coast and Wollongong areas are usually of isolated individual specimens.

396 FREE NEEDLES—DIABETICS—Mrs Skinner to the Minister for Health—
(1) Given that in March this year the Carr Government met a Coalition commitment to provide free needles to diabetics, why has he failed to deliver on this promise?
(2) When will he fulfil his commitment and provide free needles to diabetics in New South Wales?

Answer—

(1) The Government commitment was to establish a scheme of free supply within its present term of office. It has committed money in this year’s budget to commence the scheme. However, the current contract between the Commonwealth Government and Diabetes Australia specifically precludes NSW Health from commencing the scheme.
(2) The Government has been negotiating with the Commonwealth Government and Diabetes Australia to alter the current contract which expires in late 2000. The Minister wrote recently to the Federal Health Minister, the Hon Michael Wooldridge, seeking his intervention in this matter.
397 MR AND MRS REA—CENTRAL COAST AREA HEALTH SERVICE—Mrs Skinner to the Minister for Health—

In relation to Mr Peter Rea, who was the subject of two internal reviews by NSW Health—
(1) Is his department working to assist Mr and Mrs Rea in being reinstated as regular employees of the Central Coast Area Health Service?
(2) What necessary support in the nature of independent counselling and monitoring by an appropriate senior level officer within the CCAHS, as recommended in the report, has or will take place?

Answer—

(1) All offers of regular employment made by the Central Coast Area Health Service to Mr and Mrs Rea have been declined by them.
(2) Professional counselling has been provided and the Chief Executive Officer of the Central Coast Area Health Service has been personally involved in monitoring Mr and Mrs Rea’s situation.
398 EDELMAN PUBLIC RELATIONS—Mrs Skinner to the Minister for Health—
(1) Is NSW Health employing the US-international public relations consultancy Edelman Public Relations?
(2) What are the contractual and financial arrangements between NSW Health and Edelman?
(3) Is NSW Health currently engaging a former employee of NSW Health who is now employed by Edelman?
(4) What public relations qualifications and what previous public relations experience does the current head of public relations of NSW Health have?

Answer—

(1) No.
(2) and (3) Not applicable.
(4) The current Director of Health Public Affairs has a demonstrated record of achievement in the position.
399 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION OFFICE—MUSWELLBROOK—Mr Souris to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—
(1) What is the current total level of employment in the Department of Land and Water Conservation in the Upper Hunter local government areas of Merriwa, Muswellbrook, Scone and Murrurundi?
(2) What was the total level of employment in the Departments of Water Resources and Conservation and Land Management in the Upper Hunter local government areas of Merriwa, Muswellbrook, Scone and Murrurundi as at March 1995?
(3) How many employees are currently at the Scone office of the Department of Land and Water Conservation, the old CaLM office in Brook Street, Muswellbrook, the old CaLM office at Merriwa, the former workshop at CaLM Scone, the former workshop at CaLM Muswellbrook Common and at Glenbawn Dam?
(4) How many employees were located at each of the locations listed for question (3) above as at March 1995?

Answer—

(1) to (4) The Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) was formed in 1995 following the amalgamation of the former Department of Water Resources (DWR), Conservation and Land Management (CaLM) and some sections of the Public Works Department (PWD).
In the Hunter Region, a regional head office was established in Newcastle following review of existing regional offices of DWR at Muswellbrook and CaLM at Maitland. Administrative and business support positions were also relocated to provide the necessary corporate support to the region from the single office location.
During this period, the department increased the number of core service delivery positions within the Hunter Region and located them in areas close to those areas that they directly serve.
As at June 1999, the department had relocated an additional 64 positions to the Hunter Region providing a total of 357 positions within the region, an increase of almost 22 per cent on the 293 positions located in the Hunter Region in 1995.
These positions have been spread across the Hunter including towns such as Merriwa, Muswellbrook and Scone. The Hunter is now professionally and efficiently serviced by one regional office located at Newcastle.

400 PUBLIC HOSPITALS—LOTTERIES FUNDING—Mr Stoner to the Minister for Health—

In relation to funding for public hospitals, what proportion of revenue from State Lotteries is directed towards health services?
Answer—

The budget for the Health portfolio is allocated as part of the Government’s annual budget process.
The question of distribution of lottery revenue should be directed to my colleague the Hon Michael Egan MLC, Treasurer, as this matter comes within his area of responsibility.

401 PROJECT FUNDING—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—
(1) What funding projects available to the public does the Department of State Development administer?
(2) What was the total dollar amount of such funding projects for the years:
(a) 1995-96?
(b) 1996-97?
(c) 1997-98?
(d) 1998-99?
(3) What is the budgeted figure for such funds for the year 1999-2000?
(4) To what organisations or individuals were funds paid and in what amounts for:
(a) 1997-98?
(b) 1998-99?
(c) 1999-2000 (to date)?

Answer—

(1) to (3) The following table provides detail of expenditure in various assistance programs administered by the department by financial year:

PROGRAM	NOTE	1995/96 Actual $000	1996/97 Actual $000	1997/98 Actual $000	1998/99 Actual $000	1999/2000 Budget $000
Payroll Tax Rebates		166	497	358	216	150
National Industries Extension Service	1	6,293	999
Small Business Development		4,362	4,632	4,672	5,215	6,021
Regional Development Assistance		9,894	10,739	9,650	11,678	13,884
AusIndustry	2	5,302	7,431	10,267	2,225
Assistance to Industry		3,758	15,792	17,560	11,350	11,237
Hunter Advantage Fund	3			380	1,782	2,750
Regional Headquarters Tax Concessions	4		1,220	1,001	1,195	2,179
NSW High Growth Business	5				399	2,300
Illawarra Advantage Fund	6					3,000

Notes: The figures provided for 1999-2000 are the estimated figures from the Budget. The figures for the earlier financial years are the actuals as recorded in the department’s audited financial statements.
1. Program ceased 30 June 1996. Balance of program payments made in 1996-97 financial year.
2. Program ceased 10 June 1998. Balance of program payments made in 1998-99 financial year.
3. Funding for program commenced in 1997-98 financial year.
4. Program funding commenced in 1996-97 financial year.
5. Program commenced 1998-99 financial year.
6. Program commenced 1999-2000 financial year.
(4) Generally, grants paid to non-government organisations from the programs detailed in the table above are commercial in confidence and cannot be disclosed. However, in those situations where assistance paid to non-government organisations can be disclosed, the information is provided in the department’s annual report.

402 PROJECT FUNDING—Mr J.H. Turner to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Development and Minister for Rural Affairs—

(1) What funding projects, available to the public, does the Department of Regional Development administer?
(2) What was the total dollar amount of such funding projects for the years:
(a) 1995-96?
(b) 1996-97?
(c) 1997-98?
(d) 1998-99?
(3) What is the budgeted figure for such funds for the year 1999-2000?
(4) To what organisations or individuals were funds paid and in what amounts for:
(a) 1997-98?
(b) 1998-99?
(c) 1999-2000 (to date)?

Answer—

(1) to (3) The following table provides detail of expenditure in various assistance programs administered by the department by financial year:



PROGRAM	NOTE	1995-96 Actual $000	1996-97 Actual $000	1997-98 Actual $000	1998-99 Actual $000	1999-2000 Budget $000
Payroll Tax Rebates		166	497	358	216	150
National Industries Extension Service	1	6,293	999
Small Business Development		4,362	4,632	4,672	5,215	6,021
Regional Development Assistance		9,894	10,739	9,650	11,678	13,884
AusIndustry	2	5,302	7,431	10,267	2,225
Assistance to Industry		3,758	15,792	17,560	11,350	11,237
Hunter Advantage Fund	3			380	1,782	2,750
Regional Headquarters Tax Concessions	4		1,220	1,001	1,195	2,179
NSW High Growth Business	5				399	2,300
Illawarra Advantage Fund	6					3,000

Notes: The figures provided for 1999-2000 are the estimated figures from the Budget. The figures for the earlier financial years are the actuals as recorded in the department’s audited financial statements.
1. Program ceased 30 June 1996. Balance of program payments made in 1996-97 financial year.
2. Program ceased 10 June 1998. Balance of program payments made in 1998-99 financial year.
3. Funding for program commenced in 1997-98 financial year.
4. Program funding commenced in 1996-97 financial year.
5. Program commenced 1998-99 financial year.
6. Program commenced 1999-2000 financial year.
(4) Generally, grants paid to non-government organisations from the programs detailed in the table above are commercial in confidence and cannot be disclosed. However, in those situations where assistance paid to non-government organisations can be disclosed, the information is provided in the department’s annual report.

403 RESPITE CARE—ORANGE BASE HOSPITAL—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is there only one bed available at Orange Base Hospital allocated for respite care through until the year 2001?
(2) If so, why?

Answer—

(1) and (2) Respite care is a service provided by Commonwealth-funded nursing homes. I am advised that only one high level care respite bed is available in nursing homes in Orange. The question should be referred to the Commonwealth Minister for Health and Aged Care.

404 HOME CARE—ORANGE BASE HOSPITAL—Mr R.W. Turner to the Minister for Community Services, Minister for Ageing, Minister for Disability Services and Minister for Women—

Why are elderly patients, upon discharge from Orange Base Hospital, not being put on a waiting list for home care when they are clearly eligible to receive home care?

Answer—

The Home and Community Care (HACC) program, which is jointly funded by the Commonwealth and State Governments, has been designed to provide assistance to eligible persons so as to avoid their premature or inappropriate institutionalisation.
There are a large number of organisations which receive HACC funding and which deliver a range of different services.
In Orange, HACC-funded agencies include the Department of Health, the Home Care Service of NSW, Orange Community Line Transport, Orange City Council and Orange Community Resource Organisation Inc.
As far as the Home Care Service of NSW is concerned, once a referral is received from Orange Base Hospital, if the local branch is operating at capacity, the prospective client is referred to another HACC-funded agency or a suitable private provider.

405 SNOWY RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW—CAPITAL DEBT—Mr Webb to the Premier, Minister for the Arts and Minister for Citizenship—

(1) What is his Government’s position in regard to the Snowy River environmental flow?
(2) Has a cost/benefit analysis been carried out by his Government following on from the Snowy River enquiry?
(3) What is his Government’s position with respect to the writing off or down of the $1 billion Snowy Mountains Hydro Authority capital debt?

Answer—

(1) The NSW Government is committed to increasing environmental flows to the Snowy River and other river systems affected by the Snowy Scheme. However, increased water flows would not be at the expense of efficient irrigation farming.
(2) The Snowy Water Inquiry included comprehensive cost benefit analysis of a wide range of potential options. This continues to be the basis of analysis. Some areas of the work have been, and will continue to be, updated as negotiations with Victoria and the Commonwealth progress.
(3) The retirement of Snowy Mountains Authority debt is a matter for the Commonwealth Government.

406 SNOWY RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS—CAPITAL DEBT—Mr Webb to the Minister for Education and Training representing the Treasurer and Minister for State Development—

(1) What would be the economic effect on Murray Valley and Murrumbidgee irrigators, and other downstream water users, if various environmental flow regimes were to be implemented for the Snowy River?
(2) What would be the effect on the valuation and subsequent corporatisation of the Snowy Mountains Hydro Authority if 28 per cent environmental flows were instigated for the Snowy River?
(3) Is it possible for the Government to negate or write down the $1 billion capital debt that the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Authority owes?

Answer—

(1) The NSW Government is committed to minimising the impact of changes to water flow arrangements on irrigators.
(2) The Snowy Water Inquiry’s final report provides detailed analysis of these potential impacts.
(3) The retirement of Snowy Mountains Authority debt is a matter for the Commonwealth Government.

407 SNOWY MOUNTAINS HYDRO-ELECTRIC AUTHORITY—Mr Webb to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry and Minister for Western Sydney—

(1) What would be the effect on the valuation and subsequent corporatisation of the Snowy Mountains Hydro Authority if 28 per cent environmental flows were instigated for the Snowy River?
(2) Is it possible for the Government to negate or write down the $1 billion capital debt that the Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric Authority owes?

Answer—

(1) The Snowy Water Inquiry’s final report provides detailed analysis of these potential impacts.
(2) The retirement of Snowy Mountains Authority debt is a matter for the Commonwealth Government.

408 SNOWY RIVER—28 PER CENT ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW—Mr Webb to the Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) What would be the effect on Murray Valley and Murrumbidgee irrigators, and other downstream water users, if various environmental flow regimes were to be implemented for the Snowy River?
(2) What percentage reduction in available water for these irrigators would be necessary to provide for a 28 per cent environmental flow for the Snowy River?

Answer—

(1) and (2) The NSW Government is committed to ensuring that increased flows to the Snowy River will not be obtained at the expense of efficient irrigation farming. These matters are the subject of negotiations with the Victorian and Commonwealth Governments.

409 SNOWY RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS—AREA VISIT—Mr Webb to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

(1) What is his position in regard to the Snowy River environmental flows issue?
(2) Has he visited the Dalgety and District Association?
(3) If so, when?

Answer—

(1) The NSW Government is committed to increasing environmental flows to the Snowy River and other river systems affected by the Snowy Scheme. However, negotiating principles state that increased water flows would not be at the expense of efficient irrigation farming.
(2) and (3) I visited Dalgety on 2 September 1999 and spent several hours hearing the views of community members.
4 APRIL 2000

(Paper No. 25)


410 TRAVELLING STOCK STATEMENTS—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Police—

(1) Have Regional Commanders of Police lobbied the Department of Agriculture for the reintroduction of Travelling Stock Statements to be carried for the transport of livestock by motor transport?
(2) Have they asked you, as Minister for Police, to lobby the Minister for Agriculture?
(3) If so, what is the result of your representations?

411 INSURANCE PREMIUMS FOR OBSTETRICIANS—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Health—

Is he aware of reports that insurance premiums for obstetricians are set to rise next year from $42,000 to more than $60,000?
(1) Does he agree that such an exorbitant increase in premiums will force many country doctors to refrain from practicing obstetrics in rural and regional communities?
(2) Does he acknowledge that an exodus of country doctors from obstetrics practice will force expectant mothers to seek obstetric services in larger centres?
(3) Does he accept such a situation would impose hardship on expectant mothers in terms of additional accommodation and travel costs, inconvenience and dislocation of the family unit?
(4) Will he put in place strategies aimed at reducing the cost of indemnity insurance for obstetricians and maintaining existing vital obstetric services in country towns?

412 TRAVELLING STOCK STATEMENTS—Mr Armstrong to the Minister for Agriculture, and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) Has he been lobbied by the Minister for Police for the retention of Travelling Stock Statements to be carried for stock transported by motor transport?
(2) If so, what has been his response?

413 ROYAL AUSTRALIAN NAVY DEPOT SITE—Mr Brogden to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, and Minister for Housing—

(1) Did Landcom purchase the disused Royal Australian Navy depot (“the site”) in Zetland?
(2) If so, when was the site acquired?
(3) What was the purchase price?
(4) Has Landcom disposed of any part of the site?
(5) If so, to whom was it transferred, and at what price?

414 SYDNEY WATER CORPORATION—Mr Brogden to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry, and Minister for Western Sydney—

In relation to the Sydney Water Corporation:
(1) Does the Corporation serve as a sponsor or donor to any organisation or individual?
(2) If yes, how many sponsorships or donations did it make in the last financial year, who were the beneficiaries, and what is the total value of these donations or sponsorships?

415 SCOTLAND ISLAND—SEWERAGE—Mr Brogden to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services, and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

When will Sydney Water connect mains water and sewer to Scotland Island?

416 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING—WAITING PERIODS—Mr Hazzard to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, and Minister for Housing—

In relation to Department of Housing waiting periods:
(1) At 4 April 2000, what is the average waiting period in NSW, and region by region for:
(a) One bedroom accommodation?
(b) Two bedroom accommodation?
(c) Three bedroom accommodation?
(d) Four bedroom accommodation?
(2) What were the average waiting periods in NSW, and region by region between:
(a) 1 April 1995 and 1 April 1996?
(b) 1 April 1996 and 1 April 1997?
(c) 1 April 1997 and 1 April 1998?
(d) 1 April 1998 and 1 April 1999?
(e) 1 April 1999 and 1 April 2000?

417 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PROPERTIES—Mr Hazzard to the Deputy Premier, Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, and Minister for Housing—

In relation to all Department of Housing properties:
(1) How many properties were vacant for more than three months during the period from 1 April 1999 to 1 April 2000?
(2) How many properties were vacant for more than three months during the period from 1 April 1998 to 1 April 1999?
(3) How many properties were vacant for more than three months during the period from 1 April 1997 to 1 April 1998?
(4) How many properties were vacant for more than three months during the period from 1 April 1996 to 1 April 1997?
(5) How many properties were vacant for more than three months during the period from 1 April 1995 to 1 April 1996?
(6) At 4 April 2000, what is the total number of vacant properties?
(7) At 4 April 2000, what is the total number of vacant properties region by region?

418 NSW CORRECTIONAL CENTRES—INMATE NUMBERS—Mr Hazzard to the Minister for the Environment, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Corrective Services, and Minister Assisting the Premier on the Arts—

In relation to the number of inmates in NSW Correctional Centres:
(1) How many inmates were in NSW Correctional Centres between:
(a) 1 April 1995 and 1 April 1996;
(b) 1 April 1996 and 1 April 1997;
(c) 1 April 1997 and 1 April 1998;
(d) 1 April 1998 and 1 April 1999;
(e) 1 April 1999 and 1 April 2000;
and, in each period, what were the figures for males, females and aboriginal inmates?

419 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING DOCUMENT—Mr D. L. Page to the Minister for Education and Training—

With reference to the Department of Education and Training document “The New Award” (Proposed Salaries and Conditions Award for Teachers, Professional Officers, Senior Professional Officers and Related Employees) dated November 1999:
(1) What was the total cost of producing this document?
(2) What was the total cost of circulating this document to each individual departmental staff member?

420 ALSTONVILLE BYPASS—Mr D. L. Page to the Minister for Transport, and Minister for Roads—

(1) At what stage is the planning process in relation to the Alstonville Bypass?
(2) When will the final EIS be released?
(3) What traffic arrangements are now planned for the Kays Lane and Rifle Range Road end of the Bypass?
(4) How much money has been spent on the Alstonville Bypass?
(5) What is the total projected cost of the project?
(6) When is construction on the Alstonville Bypass expected to commence?
(7) When will the Alstonville Bypass be completed?

421 NORTHPOWER'S DIRECTLINK PROJECT—Mr D. L. Page to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry, and Minister for Western Sydney—

With reference to the Northpower’s Directlink Project – construction of a DC Underground Powerline from the Mullumbimby Substation to the Terranova Substation:
(1) Why hasn’t consultation occurred with local residents in relation to the work and the proposed route of the cable prior to the burying of the cable?
(2) In view of the Review of Environmental Factors comments that urban areas should be avoided wherever possible due to the uncertain health effects of the high voltage cable, why has Northpower insisted on routing the cable through the residential area of Mullumbimby?

422 PUBLIC DONATIONS—HOSPITALS—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Health—

Could he advise the amount of public donations raised and contributed to the Griffith, Leeton and Narrandera Hospitals for the years 1982, 1992 and 1999?

423 JERILDERIE MULTI PURPOSE SERVICE—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is he aware of plans to close the Jerilderie Hospital for a period of up to five weeks of the Christmas holiday period?
(2) Is he planning to make that decision?
(3) Is he aware that nursing staff at Jerilderie Hospital are prepared to work extra shifts to overcome staff shortages during the Christmas period, and have advised management of this decision?
(4) Can he reaffirm the Government’s commitment not to close NSW hospitals?
(5) When will the Service Plan for the proposed Jerilderie Multi Purpose Service be approved?
(6) Can he confirm that the Jerilderie MPS will go ahead, and what will be the time frame surrounding the establishment of the MPS?

424 EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT—INTERNATIONAL TRAVELLERS—Mr Piccoli to the Minister for Health—

(1) Is he aware that an elderly visitor from Scotland was refused treatment for a leg injury at the Leeton District Hospital because it was deemed that Scotland has no reciprocal agreement with Australia?
(2) Does Scotland have a reciprocal agreement with Australia?
(3) If not, how do visitors from other countries such as Scotland obtain medical treatment in an emergency?

425 CAMPBELLTOWN—GOULBURN RAILWAY LINE—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Transport, and Minister for Roads—

(1) How many derailments and rail accidents have occurred on the Campbelltown-Goulburn line since 1995?
(2) What was the date and nature of each incident, and where on the line did each incident occur?

426 GREEN ENERGY REQUIREMENTS—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry, and Minister for Western Sydney—

(1) Which Government departments have met the 6 per cent green energy requirement in:
(a) 1995?
(b) 1996?
(c) 1997?
(d) 1998?
(e) 1999?
(2) Which did not meet this requirement in each of the above years?
(3) Which Government agencies (off-Budget) have:
(a) met;
(b) failed to reach;
those targets in those years?

427 QX VIRUS—GEORGES RIVER—Ms Seaton to the Minister for Information Technology, Minister for Energy, Minister for Forestry, and Minister for Western Sydney—

(1) Will he confirm detail as to the quantity of sewage that was discharged into the Georges River in the last two years as a result of sewage overflows during heavy rain?
(2) Will he confirm there has been a decline in the health of oyster stocks in the Georges River since the 1994 QX Virus (a haplosporidan, otherwise known as marteilia sydeyi) outbreak?
(3) Will he rule out any link between the QX Virus outbreak and the discharge of sewage into the Georges River?

428 LOGGING OF PILLIGA FOREST—Mr Souris to the Premier, Minister for the Arts, and Minister for Citizenship—

(1) How much money will the Silicon Company, Portman Mining and Doral Minerals, pay per cubic metre for its ironbark requirements?
(2) What is the delay in setting up the Coolah/Coonabarabran/Narrabri Area Vegetation Committee?



429 MATER INSTITUTE FOR BREAST CANCER AND MELANOMA—Mr Souris to the Minister for Health—

(1) Was the then Minister for Health presented a cheque for $2 million at an October 1998, Newcastle Breast Cancer Breakfast, for the construction of the Mater Institute for Breast Cancer and Melanoma?
(2) Has a site been cleared, plans approved by Newcastle City Council and tenders called for the construction of the Mater Institute for Breast Cancer and Melanoma?
(3) When will construction begin on the Mater Institute for Breast Cancer and Melanoma?
(4) When will this project be complete and operational?

430 MAIN ROAD 354—Mr J. H. Turner to the Minister for Transport, and Minister for Roads—

(1) How many days in 1998, 1999 and 2000 to date has Main Road 354 been closed or impassable?
(2) What is the program for the upgrade of Main Road 354?
(3) If there is no program, why not?
(4) If there is a program, what monies have been allocated to the program or will be allocated to the program?
(5) Over what period of time will the upgrade occur?
(6) What will be the nature of the upgrade?
(7) Will it include a full seal?
(8) If not, why not?
(9) Will he include this road in the rebuilding country roads program or any other program?
(10) If so, when?
(11) If not, why not?
(12) Has the school bus that travels upon the road been unable to travel on the road at any time in 1998, 1999 and 2000 to date?
(13) If so, why?
(14) If so, on how many occasions did this occur in 1998, 1999 and 2000 to date?
(15) On how many occasions in each of the following years have private cars been unable to meet the school bus that travels on MR 354 due to the poor state of the road:
(a) 1998?
(b) 1999?
(c) 2000 to date?
(16) How many reports have there been of cars being washed off MR 354 at Gravel Creek in the years:
(a) 1998?
(b) 1999?
(c) 2000 to date?
(17) Is MR 354 a designated road train route?
(18) If not, are road trains using the route?
(19) If it is being used for road trains, has this created further damage to the road?
(20) If so, what is that damage?
(21) If so, what action is being taken to remedy such damage made by such road trains?
(22) Is there a mine proposed to be developed near Fifield by Black Range Minerals?
(23) Will Main Road 354 be a main route from this proposed mine to the city of Dubbo and even then on to the city of Newcastle?
(24) If not, which roads will?
(25) If MR 354 will be a major route to Dubbo and Newcastle for the mine, will he concede that the road will be subject to increased heavy vehicle traffic?
(26) If not, why not?
(27) If the proposed mine goes ahead and it is known that there is an increase in heavy vehicle traffic on MR 354, will he then move to upgrade the road?


431 WATER QUALITY TESTING PROGRAMS MYALL LAKE—Mr J. H. Turner to the Minister for Agriculture, and Minister for Land and Water Conservation—

(1) What water quality testing programs, if any, are in place for the Myall Lake?
(2) If water quality testing is in place, at which points are the testings undertaken?
(3) What are the tests seeking to detect?
(4) Has any investigation been carried out of the nutrient cycle in the lakes sediment, which would indicate the nutrients status of the lake sediment and the potential for future algae blooms?
(5) If so, when was it carried out?
(6) If so, what was the result of that investigation?
(7) Has a committee been formed to study the catchment area that drains to the Myall Lakes National Park?
(8) If so, when?
(9) If so, who is on it?
(10) If so, are there any funded positions?
(11) If so, what are those funded positions?
(12) If so, who has taken up those positions?
(13) If the positions have not been taken up, when will those positions be taken up?
(14) What is the cost of those funded positions?
(15) Where will the costs of such funded positions come from?
(16) If a committee has been formed what other costs would be associated with such committee other than funded positions?
(17) Where will such additional funds necessary to fund those costs come from?
(18) What has the Government done to educate the people in the catchment area concerning anything that might affect or cause blue-green algae bloom in the Myall Lake?

432 OYSTER FARMERS—MANNING RIVER—Mr J. H. Turner to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Affairs and Minister for Rural Affairs representing the Minister for Mineral Resources, and Minister for Fisheries—

(1) Has the Department received correspondence from oyster farmers in the Manning River asking for a waiver of fees and rentals for areas that cannot be used as a result of problems in the south arm of the Manning River?
(2) If so, when was that letter received?
(3) If so, has he replied?
(4) If not, why not?
(5) If not, will he agree to a waiver of fees and rentals on areas that cannot be used as a result of problems of the south arm of the Manning River until such time as those problems are alleviated?
(6) If not, why not?

433 MUSSEL FARMING BUOYS—Mr Webb to the Minister for Local Government, Minister for Regional Affairs and Minister for Rural Affairs representing the Minister for Mineral Resources, and Minister for Fisheries—

(1) Can he confirm that the mussel farming buoys have now been placed in their correct positions in Twofold Bay?
What procedures are in place to monitor excrement level build up on the sea floor as a result of the mussel farming?
(1) Can he confirm that the current areas of mussel farming leases won’t be exceeded in Twofold Bay?


_________________________________________
Authorised by the Parliament of New South Wales